开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

aileen20180623 · 2018年10月02日

问一道题:NO.PZ2015122802000174 [ CFA I ]

问题如下图:

    

选项:

A.

B.

C.

解释:


如果没有positive accounting earning是不是也可以用EV?

ebitda 是ev 里的?可否看成EBITDA代表EV?



1 个答案

maggie_品职助教 · 2018年10月02日

如果企业盈利为负,那么PE乘数就没有意义,此时我们可以专项使用其它乘数。EV/EBIDTA可以作为PE的替代,EBITDA是企业息税折旧前利润,通常为负的可能性比较低,EV是企业价值,建议你去听一下关于EV/EBITDA这个乘数的讲解。加油。

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 580

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2015122802000174 问题如下 analyst makes the following statement: \"Use of P/E another multiples for analysis is not effective because the multiples are baseon historicta anbecause not all companies have positive accounting earnings.\" The analyst’s statement is most likely: A.inaccurate with respeto both historicta anearnings. B.accurate with respeto historicta aninaccurate with respeto earnings. C.inaccurate with respeto historicta anaccurate with respeto earnings. A is correct.The statement is inaccurate in both respects. Although multiples ccalculatefrom historictforecastevalues cusewell. For companies without accounting earnings, severother multiples cuse These multiples are often specific to a company’s instry or sector aninclu price-to-sales anprice-to cash flow.考试PriMultiple Approach题干说的是使用乘数效果不好是因为它只能用历史数据计算得到。这显然是错的,乘数可以基于历史数据也可以用未来财务数据计算得到。此外,题干说的是PE和其他乘数,当earning为负的时候都不可以用,这也不对,PE不能用,但不代表其他乘数不能用。 讲义里面说common criticism of all mutiples是 not consir the future. 为什么题干里面说的只用了historicta是错的。

2023-07-19 11:24 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2015122802000174 问题如下 analyst makes the following statement: \"Use of P/E another multiples for analysis is not effective because the multiples are baseon historicta anbecause not all companies have positive accounting earnings.\" The analyst’s statement is most likely: A.inaccurate with respeto both historicta anearnings. B.accurate with respeto historicta aninaccurate with respeto earnings. C.inaccurate with respeto historicta anaccurate with respeto earnings. A is correct.The statement is inaccurate in both respects. Although multiples ccalculatefrom historictforecastevalues cusewell. For companies without accounting earnings, severother multiples cuse These multiples are often specific to a company’s instry or sector aninclu price-to-sales anprice-to cash flow.考试PriMultiple Approach题干说的是使用乘数效果不好是因为它只能用历史数据计算得到。这显然是错的,乘数可以基于历史数据也可以用未来财务数据计算得到。此外,题干说的是PE和其他乘数,当earning为负的时候都不可以用,这也不对,PE不能用,但不代表其他乘数不能用。 1 如果是对于trailing multiple的话,用的历史数据;但用leang 指标,是反映了未来的。2 PE ratio的确是当earning小于0时,不可用。这题关键词在于other multiples吗? 比如 PB ratio、 PS ratio,当earning小于0时,可用。所以选择A吗?

2023-06-04 21:05 1 · 回答

accurate with respeto historicta aninaccurate with respeto earnings. inaccurate with respeto historicta anaccurate with respeto earnings. A is correct. The statement is inaccurate in both respects. Although multiples ccalculatefrom historictforecastevalues cusewell. For companies without accounting earnings, severother multiples cuse These multiples are often specific to a company’s instry or sector aninclu price-to-sales anprice-to cash flow.课件里不是写价格乘数的缺点是只能看历史数据不能考虑将来的情况吗

2020-06-21 19:26 1 · 回答

我想问一下导致P/E not effective的原因是什么?

2020-01-26 15:48 1 · 回答

答案是什么意思????………

2019-09-20 00:42 1 · 回答