为什么15%是Re的收益，而不是Ra的收益？

NO.PZ2023122201000070

问题如下：

A hedge fund with net capital of GBP500 million has borrowed an additional GBP200 million at 4.5% per annum. The current-year return of the fund is 15%. What would have been the return if the fund had not added any leverage?

选项：

A.10.70% B.12.00% C.19.20%

解释：

rL= Leveraged portfolio return/Cash position = [r × (Vb +Vc) – (Vb × rb)]/Vc. Or, after re-arranging the formula, r= [(Vc × rL ) + (Vb × rb)]/(Vc + Vb) . Substituting rL= 0.15, Vb= 200, Vc= 500, rb= 0.045, r = (500 × 0.15) + (200 × 0.045)/(200 + 500) = 12%. Since leverage magnifies return when the borrowing cost is lower than asset returns, the unleveraged asset return must be lower than 15%.

（500+200）*r_A=200*4.5%+500*15%，反解出r_A=12%

current-year return of the fund is 15%. 15% 为什么不是整个asset的收益呢？

添加评论

1 个答案

已采纳答案

pzqa35 · 2024年10月08日

嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：

首先，题目中有表述说“current-year return of the fund”，这个就是说这个fund的收益情况，也就是说是站在equity的角度去看的，也就是R_E。

其次题目问的是“What would have been the return if the fund had not added any leverage”不考虑杠杆带来的影响，这个就是站在总资产的角度，所以就是R_A，从这两个角度都可以进行相应的区分哈。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版，加油！

添加评论

1
回答
0
关注
64
浏览

我要回答关注问题

相关问题

NO.PZ2023122201000070 问题如下 A hee funwith net capitof GBP500 million hborroweaitionGBP200 million 4.5% per annum. The current-yereturn of the funis 15%. Whwoulhave been the return if the funhnot aeany leverage? A.10.70% B.12.00% C.19.20% rL= Leverageportfolio return/Cash position = [r × (Vb +V– (Vb × rb)]/Vc.Or, after re-arranging the formula,r= [(Vc × rL ) + (Vb × rb)]/(Vc + V.Substituting rL= 0.15, V200, V500, r0.045,r = (500 × 0.15) + (200 × 0.045)/(200 + 500) = 12%.Sinleverage magnifies return when the borrowing cost is lower thasset returns, the unleverageasset return must lower th15%.（500+200）*rA=200*4.5%+500*15%，反解出rA=12% 麻烦老师讲解一下题目思路和用的公式，谢谢

2024-10-05 22:26 1 · 回答

为什么15%是Re的收益，而不是Ra的收益？

1 个答案

1

0

64

相关问题