开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

yan · 2024年09月26日

为什么goal不对,TEF的mission有3个目标需要实现,且这些目标都是要支付的目标,也不是asset

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202301280100000802

问题如下:

TEF’s broad approach to asset allocation can best be described as:

选项:

A.

asset-only.

B.

goals-based.

C.

liability-relative.

解释:

Asset-only approaches to asset allocation focus solely on the asset side of the investor’s balance sheet. Liabilities are not explicitly modeled. Mean–variance optimization (MVO) is the most familiar and deeply studied asset-only approach. MVO considers only the expected returns, risks, and correlations of the asset classes in the opportunity set. In contrast, liability-relative and goals-based approaches explicitly account for the liability side of the economic balance sheet, dedicating assets to meet, respectively, legal liabilities or quasi-liabilities (other needs that are not strictly liabilities but are treated as such) and goals.


为什么goal不对,TEF的mission有3个目标需要实现,且这些目标都是要支付的目标,也不是asset

1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2024年09月27日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学你好:


TEF 是 endowment, endowment都有其return objective, 在case中有交代:“TEF’s current investment objective is to generate a real rate of return in excess of thatrequired to fund ongoing distributions in accordance with TEF’s mission, with a maximum acceptable volatility of 16% per year, and to maximize the Sharpe ratio of TEF’s total financial assets . ” 前文中的三个mission,其实就是return objective的分解,它并不是goals, 这一点在机构IPS的科目中,同学会有进一步的了解。


在AA的goal based approach中,往往典型的出题方式都是会先给出probability of success,对goal也会有need,want, will之分,然后再根据不同goal的return 和 risk 的要求,或是sharpe ratio 最大的,去分别选择适合每一个goal 的 portfolio.


----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 80

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202301280100000802 问题如下 TheEnwment Fun(TEF) of a mestic researuniversity is currently unrgoingits triennigovernanaut anreview of operations. The research,selection, anevaluation of investment managers are the responsibilities of theinvestment committee. Inviasset selection is legatethe committeeto outsi managers anrevieweinternstaff. Performanevaluation aneporting are conctethe internstaff, with input from consultants anustoans.TEF’smission is threefol (1) support scholarships, (2) support capitalimprovements,an(3) funa portion of the university’s operating buet. Inaition to consiring expectereturn in relation to volatility, theinvestment committee wants to inclu the following factors in its strategicasset allocation review:• The mestic equity market represents only 7% ofglobequity market capitalization. • The university attracts a globstunt bo, annrollment levels tento trathe performanof velopemarket economies.• The university plans to significantly increase itsspenng on capitimprovements over the next severyears.• Sincontributions typically come from externalnors, TEF hlittle control over the timing anamounts of contributions tothe funTEF’scurrent investment objective is to generate a rerate of return in excess ofthatrequireto funongoing stributions in accornwith TEF’s mission,with a maximum acceptable volatility of 16% per year, anto maximize theSharpe ratio of TEF’s totfinanciassets . TEF is intent on selectingportfolios thmake efficient use of asset risk. TEF employs a mean–varianceoptimization approathconsirs only the expectereturns, risks, ancorrelationsof the asset classes in the opportunity set. Thecurrent financiassets of TEF consist of $45 million in mestic large anicequities an$35 million in mestic nominfixeincome. The presentvalue of expectefuture contributions to TEF is estimateto $230 million.The financiliabilities of TEF consist of mortgage currently valueat$19 million. The present value of expectefuture support is estimateto be$171 million. TEF invests through externmanagers. partof the review of operations, a consultant examines the asset class correlationsof TEF’s current equity investments, finng thnone of the classes’ pairwisecorrelations excee0.95.Theconsultant consirs mestic small-cequities a separate asset class thatwoulnot raise any new regulatory restrictions. The consultant recommen thatTEF consir aing this asset class to its existing mestic equityallocation.A rangeof potentistrategic asset allocation choices for consiration theinvestment committee are velopethe internstaff through optimizationexercises anare presentein Exhibit 1.Exhibit 1 TEF’sbroapproato asset allocation cbest scribeas: A.asset-only. B.goals-base C.liability-relative. Asset-only approaches to asset allocation focus solely on the asset si of the investor’s balansheet. Liabilities are not explicitly mole Mean–varianoptimization (MVO) is the most familianeply stueasset-only approach. MVO consirs only the expectereturns, risks, ancorrelations of the asset classes in the opportunity set. In contrast, liability-relative angoals-baseapproaches explicitly account for the liability si of the economic balansheet, cating assets to meet, respectively, legliabilities or quasi-liabilities (other nee thare not strictly liabilities but are treatesuch) angoals. 请教一下为什么不是liability iven?目标里说为了达到。。。的收益率去support 。。。的支出么?

2025-02-03 12:07 1 · 回答