开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

SHAO · 2024年08月25日

老师,请教下C选项

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202403070100000202

问题如下:

Is any further action most likely required of Prem and Mathew prior to publishing an investment report using the information received in their meeting with Kandy Tea Estate?

选项:

A.No. B.Yes, convince the company to make a public disclosure. C.Yes, independently verify the information provided by the company.

解释:

Solution
  1. Correct. Though the information is nonpublic, it is unlikely that news of a new factory layout would be considered “material,” especially in that it does not require new machinery or personnel. Therefore, no public disclosure is required. Independent verification is not necessarily required because Prem and Mathew are able to see the increased efficiencies during their factory tour.

  2. Incorrect because even though the information is nonpublic, it is unlikely that news of a new factory layout would be considered “material”, especially since it does not require new machinery or personnel. Therefore, no public disclosure is required.

  3. Incorrect because Prem and Mathew are able to see the increased efficiencies during their factory tour.

Guidance for Standards I–VII
  • recommend practices and procedures designed to prevent violations of the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct

老师,两个问题请教下:

1、分析师能直接用研究对象提供的信息吗?使用研究对象提供的信息时,是否需要verify

2、本题目为什么不选C呢?是因为“Prem and Mathew see the increased efficiencies during their factory tour.”这句话表示他们已经尽调了吗?相当于已经verify信息了?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年08月26日

分析师能否直接使用研究对象提供的信息,以及是否需要验证这些信息?

分析师在使用研究对象提供的信息时,需要谨慎对待。虽然他们可以使用这些信息,但必须确保信息的准确性和可靠性。在某些情况下,分析师可能需要独立验证这些信息,特别是当这些信息对投资建议或投资决策具有重要影响时。然而,如果分析师能够通过其他方式(如实地考察、与管理层交流等)确认信息的准确性,那么可能不需要额外的独立验证。

为什么本题目不选C,即为什么不需要独立验证信息?

在这个特定的情况下,Prem和Mathew在访问Kandy Tea Estate Limited时,亲自看到了工厂布局的改变以及由此带来的效率提升。这意味着他们已经通过实地考察的方式验证了信息的准确性。因此,他们不需要再进行额外的独立验证。所以,选项C(独立验证信息)并不适用,因为Prem和Mathew已经通过他们的观察验证了信息的真实性。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 318

    浏览
相关问题