开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

karweillas · 2024年08月12日

如下

NO.PZ2020021601000018

问题如下:

Judith Yoo is a financial sector analyst writing an industry report.

Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a global commercial bank, and its CAMELS rating, risk management practices, and performance.

To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the consumer loan credit quality profile in Exhibit 3.

Based on Exhibit 3, the trend in impairment allowances is reflective of the changes in:

选项:

A.

impaired assets.

B.

strong credit quality assets.

C.

past due but not impaired assets.

解释:

C is correct.

Impairment allowances have increased proportionately to the increases in the amount of past due but not impaired assets, which may be in anticipation of these past due assets becoming impaired. Impaired assets have decreased each year while strong credit quality assets have increased each year, which suggests lowering impairment allowances as a result of improving credit quality of these financial instruments.

2015 to 2016 change in impaired assets: (9,345/10,235)-1=-8.7%

2015 to 2016 change in strong credit quality assets: (327,345/320,340)-1=2.2%

2015 to 2016 change in past due but not impaired assets: (2,314/2,058)-1=12.4%

2015 to 2016 change in impairment allowances: (-4,500/-4,000)-1=12.5%

2016 to 2017 change in impaired assets: (8,804/9,345)-1=-5.8%

2016 to 2017 change in strong credit quality assets: (338,948/327,345)-1=3.5%

2016 to 2017 change in past due but not impaired assets: (2,823/2,314)-1=22.0%

2016 to 2017 change in impairment allowances: (-5,500/-4,500)-1=22.2%

1.这里的impaired(asset)是流量还是存量呢?


2.impaired我理解是已经减值了的资产,即已经减值的资产,应该是会导致allowance降低的?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2024年08月13日

同学你好,这个表格是一个对“consumer loan”这个银行资产科目进行细项拆分的说明性质的表格,所以这里的impaired 科目是累计余额而不是本年发生额的意思、

impaired 这项已经发生减值的贷款的余额的多少,和impairment allowance的多少是没有必然联系的。毕竟impairment allowance是对还未减值的项目计提减值准备用的,和其他还未减值的贷款类型本年计提的减值准备更多还是更少的关系才更紧密。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 126

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2020021601000018 问题如下 Juth Yoo is a financisector analyst writing instry report. Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a globcommercibank, anits CAMELS rating, risk management practices, anperformance. To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the consumer locret quality profile in Exhibit 3.Baseon Exhibit 3, the trenin impairment allowances is reflective of the changes in: A.impaireassets. B.strong cret quality assets. C.past e but not impaireassets. C is correct.Impairment allowances have increaseproportionately to the increases in the amount of past e but not impaireassets, whimin anticipation of these past e assets becoming impaire Impaireassets have creaseeayewhile strong cret quality assets have increaseeayear, whisuggests lowering impairment allowances a result of improving cret quality of these financiinstruments.2015 to 2016 change in impaireassets: (9,345/10,235)-1=-8.7%2015 to 2016 change in strong cret quality assets: (327,345/320,340)-1=2.2%2015 to 2016 change in past e but not impaireassets: (2,314/2,058)-1=12.4%2015 to 2016 change in impairment allowances: (-4,500/-4,000)-1=12.5%2016 to 2017 change in impaireassets: (8,804/9,345)-1=-5.8%2016 to 2017 change in strong cret quality assets: (338,948/327,345)-1=3.5%2016 to 2017 change in past e but not impaireassets: (2,823/2,314)-1=22.0%2016 to 2017 change in impairment allowances: (-5,500/-4,500)-1=22.2% 这里的几个比例是什么关系,能讲解一下吗?

2024-10-15 13:17 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020021601000018 问题如下 Juth Yoo is a financisector analyst writing instry report. Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a globcommercibank, anits CAMELS rating, risk management practices, anperformance. To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the consumer locret quality profile in Exhibit 3.Baseon Exhibit 3, the trenin impairment allowances is reflective of the changes in: A.impaireassets. B.strong cret quality assets. C.past e but not impaireassets. C is correct.Impairment allowances have increaseproportionately to the increases in the amount of past e but not impaireassets, whimin anticipation of these past e assets becoming impaire Impaireassets have creaseeayewhile strong cret quality assets have increaseeayear, whisuggests lowering impairment allowances a result of improving cret quality of these financiinstruments.2015 to 2016 change in impaireassets: (9,345/10,235)-1=-8.7%2015 to 2016 change in strong cret quality assets: (327,345/320,340)-1=2.2%2015 to 2016 change in past e but not impaireassets: (2,314/2,058)-1=12.4%2015 to 2016 change in impairment allowances: (-4,500/-4,000)-1=12.5%2016 to 2017 change in impaireassets: (8,804/9,345)-1=-5.8%2016 to 2017 change in strong cret quality assets: (338,948/327,345)-1=3.5%2016 to 2017 change in past e but not impaireassets: (2,823/2,314)-1=22.0%2016 to 2017 change in impairment allowances: (-5,500/-4,500)-1=22.2% 这题A为什么错

2024-04-09 22:22 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2020021601000018 问题如下 Juth Yoo is a financisector analyst writing instry report. Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a globcommercibank, anits CAMELS rating, risk management practices, anperformance. To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the consumer locret quality profile in Exhibit 3.Baseon Exhibit 3, the trenin impairment allowances is reflective of the changes in: A.impaireassets. B.strong cret quality assets. C.past e but not impaireassets. C is correct.Impairment allowances have increaseproportionately to the increases in the amount of past e but not impaireassets, whimin anticipation of these past e assets becoming impaire Impaireassets have creaseeayewhile strong cret quality assets have increaseeayear, whisuggests lowering impairment allowances a result of improving cret quality of these financiinstruments.2015 to 2016 change in impaireassets: (9,345/10,235)-1=-8.7%2015 to 2016 change in strong cret quality assets: (327,345/320,340)-1=2.2%2015 to 2016 change in past e but not impaireassets: (2,314/2,058)-1=12.4%2015 to 2016 change in impairment allowances: (-4,500/-4,000)-1=12.5%2016 to 2017 change in impaireassets: (8,804/9,345)-1=-5.8%2016 to 2017 change in strong cret quality assets: (338,948/327,345)-1=3.5%2016 to 2017 change in past e but not impaireassets: (2,823/2,314)-1=22.0%2016 to 2017 change in impairment allowances: (-5,500/-4,500)-1=22.2% rt,他和impairment allowance有什么联系

2024-03-04 12:36 1 · 回答

strong cret quality assets. past e but not impaireassets. C is correct. Impairment allowances have increaseproportionately to the increases in the amount of past e but not impaireassets, whimin anticipation of these past e assets becoming impaire Impaireassets have creaseeayewhile strong cret quality assets have increaseeayear, whisuggests lowering impairment allowances a result of improving cret quality of these financiinstruments. 2015 to 2016 change in impaireassets: (9,345/10,235)-1=-8.7% 2015 to 2016 change in strong cret quality assets: (327,345/320,340)-1=2.2% 2015 to 2016 change in past e but not impaireassets: (2,314/2,058)-1=12.4% 2015 to 2016 change in impairment allowances: (-4,500/-4,000)-1=12.5% 2016 to 2017 change in impaireassets: (8,804/9,345)-1=-5.8% 2016 to 2017 change in strong cret quality assets: (338,948/327,345)-1=3.5% 2016 to 2017 change in past e but not impaireassets: (2,823/2,314)-1=22.0% 2016 to 2017 change in impairment allowances: (-5,500/-4,500)-1=22.2% 没懂这道题的点,公司计提减值的比例变大了,那不是状况变好了吗?不是都源于超期没有计提的资产啊?因为超期没计提坏账的资产占比其实下降了啊……

2022-07-19 23:02 2 · 回答