大兵张嘎 · 2024年08月09日
NO.PZ2024010508000023
问题如下：
Which of these does not describe an approach to ESG integration in a portfolio?选项：
A.Impact investing
B.Green securitization
C.Negative screening
解释：
B is correct. Green securitization is not an approach to ESG integration in a portfolio. Rather, it represents the mutualization of illiquid “green” assets into a security.是因为绿色证券化是独立于esg intergration，是和esg intergration并列存在的一个选项吗？
净净_品职助教 · 2024年08月09日
嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：
ESG整合的常见方法包括Negative screening（负面筛选）和Impact investing（影响力投资）等，这些方法旨在将ESG因素纳入投资组合的构建和管理中。
而Green securitization（绿色证券化）的主要目的是将非流动性的“绿色”资产或一系列资产进行证券化，它本身并不是一种将ESG因素整合到投资组合中的方法，而是一种与ESG相关的金融工具或手段。
因此，B选项Green securitization不属于ESG整合在投资组合中的方法。它与ESG整合并不是并列的关系，而是在ESG领域中涉及的一个不同的概念或工具。
----------------------------------------------虽然现在很辛苦，但努力过的感觉真的很好，加油！
NO.PZ2024010508000023 问题如下 Whiof these es not scriapproato ESG integration in a portfolio? A.Impainvesting B.Green securitization C.Negative screening B is correct. Green securitization is not approato ESG integration in a portfolio. Rather, it represents the mutualization of illiqui“green” assets into a security. 可以介绍一下Green securitization吗？ 讲义里是都有提及？
NO.PZ2024010508000023问题如下Whiof these es not scriapproato ESG integration in a portfolio?A.ImpainvestingB.Green securitizationC.Negative screeningB is correct. Green securitization is not approato ESG integration in a portfolio. Rather, it represents the mutualization of illiqui“green” assets into a security.这道题说negative screening属于ESG integration的approach。但是第二章提到过欧洲最多的ESG策略是negative screening，美国最多的的策略是ESG integration。negative screening 和ESG integration 应该不是包含关系呀？
