开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

阿远酱 · 2024年08月08日

A为什么不对

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202401170100001001

问题如下:

Which of the IC member’s statements regarding hedge fund strategies is incorrect?

选项:

A.Statement 1

B.Statement 2

C.Statement 3

解释:

B is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect: Event-driven strategies, such as merger arbitrage, tend to be exposed to some natural equity market beta risk. Overall market risk can potentially disrupt a merger’s consummation (though hedging may be possible). To the extent that deals are more likely to fail in market stress periods, event-driven merger arbitrage strategies have market sensitivity and left-tail risk attributes. Also, while event-driven strategies may have less beta exposure than simple, long-only beta allocations, the higher hedge fund fees effectively result in a particularly expensive form of embedded beta. Equity market-neutral strategies do use a relative value approach, because such strategies hold balanced long and short equity exposures to maintain zero (or close to zero) net exposure to the equity market and such factors as sector and size. Also, opportunistic strategies do have risk exposure to market directionality, also called trendiness.

relative value 不是一种对冲基金策略吗,也是equity market neutral的方法吗

1 个答案
已采纳答案

pzqa35 · 2024年08月09日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


relative value approach不是relative value strategies,relative value approach是指相对价值法,也就是将一个标的和另一个标的进行比较,从而得出谁高估、谁低估,这个就算是relative value approach。equity market neutral就是将两个股票进行比较,从而long 低估、short 高估,这就是使用了绝对价值法。

而relative value strategies才是我们对冲基金的策略哈。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 55

    浏览
相关问题