开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

cenwandada · 2024年08月06日

这道题可以解释一下吗

NO.PZ2023100703000107

问题如下:

The manager of the fixed-income desk of an investment bank is examining the current term structure of swap rates and believes that the 5-year swap rate is too low relative to the 2-year and 10-year swap rates. The manager asks a risk analyst to design a hedged butterfly trade in which the bank is the payer in a 5-year swap contract and the receiver in 2-year and 10-year swap contracts. The analyst decides to perform a principal components analysis (PCA) of the term structure of swap rates and use the results of the PCA to construct the butterfly trade. The principal components (PCs) identified as having the greatest impact are the level, the slope, and the short rate. The results of the PCA, stated as the change in bps in the swap rates due to a 1 standard deviation increase in the PC, are given in the table below:

The analyst also notes that these three PCs explain over 99.5% of the variability in the swap rates, with the level PC having the greatest impact, the slope PC having a smaller impact, and the short rate PC only having an impact on very short-term swap rates.

To construct the hedged butterfly position, the analyst collects the current swap rates and DV01s of the 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year swaps, shown in the table below:

After receiving this information from the analyst, the manager instructs the analyst to construct a butterfly position with a notional amount of EUR 100 million in the 5-year swap in such a way that exposures to the level and slope PCs are neutralized. What notional amounts of the 2-year swap and the 10-year swap should be included in the butterfly and what are the risk weights of the two swaps relative to the DV01 of the 5-year swap?

选项:

A.Choice A

B.Choice B

C.Choice C

D.Choice D

解释:

Solvingfor the face values of the 2-year and 10-year swaps requires using a system oftwo equations and two unknown variables.

Notionalamount of 5-year swap is 100.

Equation1that neutralizes exposure to level PC is:

F(2)* (DV01(2)/100) * LevelPC(2) + F(10) * (DV01(10)/100) * LevelPC(10) + 100*(DV01(5)/100)* LevelPC(5) = 0

Equation1using the information in the tables is:

F(2)* 0.0014421 + F(10) * 0.00396933 + 100 * 0.00296112 = 0

Solvingfor F(2):

F(2) = ( -0.296112 - F(10) * 0.00396933) / 0.0014421

Equation2that neutralizes exposure to slope PC:

F(2)* (DV01(2)/100) * SlopePC(2) + F(10) * (DV01(10)/100) * SlopePC(10) + 100*(DV01(5)/100)* SlopePC(5) = 0

Equation2using the information in the table is:

F(2)* -0.00083505 + F(10) * 0.00001462 + 100 * -0.00063488 = 0

Substitutethe previously solved for F(2) into Equation2 and solve for F(10)

-0.579051383 * (-0.296112 - F(10) * 0.00396933) + F(10) * 0.00001462 - 0.063488=0

0.171464063+ F(10) * 0.002298446 + F(10) * 0.00001462 = 0.063488

F(10)* 0.002298446 + F(10) * 0.00001462 = -0.107976063

F(10)* 0.002313066 = -0.107976063

F(10)= -46.68092564 , or a face value of EUR 46.68 million

Substitutingthis value of F(10) into the equation for F(2) and solving for F(2):

F(2)= ( -0.296112 – -46.68093 *0.00396933) / 0.0014421

F(2)= -76.84626685 , or a face value of EUR 76.85 million

Theface value of the 2-year swap receiving should be EUR 76.85 million

Theface value of the 10-year swap receiving should be EUR 46.68 million

Therisk weight of the 2-year swap relative to DV01 of the 5-year swap is equal to:

(F(2) * (DV01(2)/100))/DV01(5) =0.44155617or 44.2%

Andthe risk weight of the 10-year swap relative to DV01 of the 5-year swap is:

0.687978965or 68.8%

A isincorrect. This answer choice is incorrect in two ways. First, the notionalamount of the 2-year swap is incorrectly adjusted so that the notional amountsof the 2-year swap and the 10-year swap add up to 100 to offset the notionalamount of the 5-year swap. Second, the risk weights are assumed to sum to 100%,so the percentages are incorrectly adjusted to weight out of 100.

B isincorrect. The notional amount of the 10-year swap is incorrectly adjusted so thatthe notional amounts of the 2-year swap and the 10-year swap add up to 100 to offsetthe notional amount of the 5-year swap.

D isincorrect. The risk weights are assumed to sum to 100%, so the percentages areincorrectly adjusted to weight out of 100.

​这道题可以解释一下吗

1 个答案

pzqa39 · 2024年08月07日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


这道题李老师在讲解的时候说是一道很好的题,一定要会做。建议去听一下李老师的详细讲解,在第七章Empirical Approaches To Risk Metrics And Hedging的经典题视频里面,1倍速22分的位置。这道题分析过程比较长,只看文字的答案可能比较难理解。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 114

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023100703000107 问题如下 The manager of the fixeincome sk of investment bank is examining the current term structure of swrates anbelieves ththe 5-yeswrate is too low relative to the 2-yean10-yeswrates. The manager asks a risk analyst to sign a heebutterfly tra in whithe bank is the payer in a 5-yeswcontraanthe receiver in 2-yean10-yeswcontracts. The analyst cis to perform a principcomponents analysis (PCof the term structure of swrates anuse the results of the Pto construthe butterfly tra. The principcomponents (PCs) intifiehaving the greatest impaare the level, the slope, anthe short rate. The results of the PCstatethe change in bps in the swrates e to a 1 stanrviation increase in the Pare given in the table below:The analyst also notes ththese three Pexplain over 99.5% of the variability in the swrates, with the level PC having the greatest impact, the slope PC having a smaller impact, anthe short rate PC only having impaon very short-term swrates.To construthe heebutterfly position, the analyst collects the current swrates an01s of the 2-year, 5-year, an10-yeswaps, shown in the table below:After receiving this information from the analyst, the manager instructs the analyst to construa butterfly position with a notionamount of EUR 100 million in the 5-yeswin sua wthexposures to the level anslope Pare neutralize Whnotionamounts of the 2-yeswanthe 10-yeswshoulincluin the butterfly anwhare the risk weights of the two swaps relative to the 01 of the 5-yeswap? A.Choi B.Choi C.Choi Choi Solvingfor the favalues of the 2-yean10-yeswaps requires using a system oftwo equations antwo unknown variables.Notionalamount of 5-yeswis 100.Equation1thneutralizes exposure to level PC is:F(2)* (01(2)/100) * LevelPC(2) + F(10) * (01(10)/100) * LevelPC(10) + 100*(01(5)/100)* LevelPC(5) = 0Equation1using the information in the tables is:F(2)* 0.0014421 + F(10) * 0.00396933 + 100 * 0.00296112 = 0Solvingfor F(2):F(2) = ( -0.296112 - F(10) * 0.00396933) / 0.0014421Equation2thneutralizes exposure to slope PC:F(2)* (01(2)/100) * SlopePC(2) + F(10) * (01(10)/100) * SlopePC(10) + 100*(01(5)/100)* SlopePC(5) = 0Equation2using the information in the table is:F(2)* -0.00083505 + F(10) * 0.00001462 + 100 * -0.00063488 = 0Substitutethe previously solvefor F(2) into Equation2 ansolve for F(10)-0.579051383 * (-0.296112 - F(10) * 0.00396933) + F(10) * 0.00001462 - 0.063488=00.171464063+ F(10) * 0.002298446 + F(10) * 0.00001462 = 0.063488F(10)* 0.002298446 + F(10) * 0.00001462 = -0.107976063F(10)* 0.002313066 = -0.107976063F(10)= -46.68092564 , or a favalue of EUR 46.68 millionSubstitutingthis value of F(10) into the equation for F(2) ansolving for F(2):F(2)= ( -0.296112 – -46.68093 *0.00396933) / 0.0014421F(2)= -76.84626685 , or a favalue of EUR 76.85 millionThefavalue of the 2-yeswreceiving shoulEUR 76.85 millionThefavalue of the 10-yeswreceiving shoulEUR 46.68 millionTherisk weight of the 2-yeswrelative to 01 of the 5-yeswis equto:(F(2) * (01(2)/100))/01(5) =0.44155617or 44.2%Anhe risk weight of the 10-yeswrelative to 01 of the 5-yeswis:0.687978965or 68.8%A isincorrect. This answer choiis incorrein two ways. First, the notionalamount of the 2-yeswis incorrectly austeso ththe notionamountsof the 2-yeswanthe 10-yeswa up to 100 to offset the notionalamount of the 5-yeswap. Secon the risk weights are assumeto sum to 100%,so the percentages are incorrectly austeto weight out of 100.B isincorrect. The notionamount of the 10-yeswis incorrectly austeso thatthe notionamounts of the 2-yeswanthe 10-yeswa up to 100 to offsetthe notionamount of the 5-yeswap.isincorrect. The risk weights are assumeto sum to 100%, so the percentages areincorrectly austeto weight out of 100. 看了经典题视频,还是不太懂

2024-11-13 00:08 1 · 回答