开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

sliang · 2024年08月04日

risk parity 课后题

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201803130100000107

问题如下:

In the risk parity asset allocation approach that Müller uses, the weight that Müller places on domestic bonds should be:

选项:

A.

less than 25%.

B.

equal to 25%.

C.

greater than 25%.

解释:

C is correct.

A risk parity asset allocation is based on the notion that each asset class should contribute equally to the total risk of the portfolio. Bonds have the lowest risk level and must contribute 25% of the portfolio’s total risk, so bonds must be overweighted (greater than 25%). The equal contribution of each asset class is calculated as:

wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2

where

wi = weight of asset i

Cov(ri,rp) = covariance of asset i with the portfolio

n = number of assets

σ2= variance of the portfolio

In this example, there are four asset classes, and the variance of the total portfolio is assumed to be 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to each asset class is expected to contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the total variance. Because bonds have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk as the other asset classes.

  1. 为什么 variance of total portfolio = 25%?
  2. 1/n * portfolio variance = w * covariance, 1/n * portfolio variance = actr, 那么 w * covariance = actr 么?如果是的话, 应该怎么理解这个公式呢?
1 个答案
已采纳答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2024年08月04日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


同学你好:


我先回答你第一个问题。

风险平价在资产配置里的观念是,每个资产类别对投资组合的总风险的贡献应该相等。在这个例子中,有四个资产类别,如果平均来看,每个资产应该贡献总风险的25%,“the variance of the total portfolio is assumed to be 25%” 这句话确实有些歧义,应该理解为每个资产应该贡献总风险的25%。

但是由于domestic bond是这四类资产中风险最低的,并且domestic bond与其他资产的协方差也是最低的,所以如果想要让domestic bond贡献出和其他资产相同的风险,那就需要domestic bond的配置权重必须大于平均的25%,因此它们必须具有较高的相对权重才能实现与其他资产类别相同的风险贡献。


再回答你的第二个问题。

通过我对你第一个问题的解释,能够看出来这道题是不需要计算的,所以答案解析里那个公式其实是用不到的,这个公式在M2的other approach to AA的知识点中有讲到,就在我下面截图中红框中的视频,1.5倍速的话,大概是从8分钟开始。这个公式是ACTR1=ACTR2的均衡条件,它是通过对weights的倒数推导出来的。我在这里写的推导过程,肯定没有何老师课程中讲解的清楚,所以建议同学用5分钟时间听一下这个内容,就能理解了。

还有就是,这个公式极大概率下,是不会考察的,所以建议同学对它有个印象就好,如果实在不理解是如何推导的,那就记住它,毕竟也不复杂。






----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 134

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201803130100000107 问题如下 In the risk parity asset allocation approathMüller uses, the weight thMüller places on mestic bon shoulbe: A.less th25%. B.equto 25%. C.greater th25%. C is correct. A risk parity asset allocation is baseon the notion theaasset class shoulcontribute equally to the totrisk of the portfolio. Bon have the lowest risk level anmust contribute 25% of the portfolio’s totrisk, so bon must overweighte(greater th25%). The equcontribution of eaasset class is calculateas:wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2 wherewi = weight of asset iCov(ri,rp) = covarianof asset i with the portfolion = number of assetsσ2= varianof the portfolioIn this example, there are four asset classes, anthe varianof the totportfolio is assumeto 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to eaasset class is expecteto contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the totvariance. Because bon have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk the other asset classes. 1.文中只说了收益最小,没说风险最小,如何得出风险最小?2.如何从公式理解这道题?

2024-09-23 10:34 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000107 问题如下 In the risk parity asset allocation approathMüller uses, the weight thMüller places on mestic bon shoulbe: A.less th25%. B.equto 25%. C.greater th25%. C is correct. A risk parity asset allocation is baseon the notion theaasset class shoulcontribute equally to the totrisk of the portfolio. Bon have the lowest risk level anmust contribute 25% of the portfolio’s totrisk, so bon must overweighte(greater th25%). The equcontribution of eaasset class is calculateas:wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2 wherewi = weight of asset iCov(ri,rp) = covarianof asset i with the portfolion = number of assetsσ2= varianof the portfolioIn this example, there are four asset classes, anthe varianof the totportfolio is assumeto 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to eaasset class is expecteto contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the totvariance. Because bon have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk the other asset classes. 明白本题原理,对于文中提法有疑惑1.. The expectereturn of the mestic bonasset class is the lowest of the asset classes, 本句只说了mestic bonreturn最小,没有说risk最小,是据此退出的risk最小?2.anthe returns of the mestic bonasset class have the lowest covarianwith other asset class returns.mestic bon和其他资产的协方差最小,没有说公式里的和组合的协方差最小,怎么推出?

2024-06-30 19:36 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000107 问题如下 In the risk parity asset allocation approathMüller uses, the weight thMüller places on mestic bon shoulbe: A.less th25%. B.equto 25%. C.greater th25%. C is correct. A risk parity asset allocation is baseon the notion theaasset class shoulcontribute equally to the totrisk of the portfolio. Bon have the lowest risk level anmust contribute 25% of the portfolio’s totrisk, so bon must overweighte(greater th25%). The equcontribution of eaasset class is calculateas:wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2 wherewi = weight of asset iCov(ri,rp) = covarianof asset i with the portfolion = number of assetsσ2= varianof the portfolioIn this example, there are four asset classes, anthe varianof the totportfolio is assumeto 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to eaasset class is expecteto contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the totvariance. Because bon have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk the other asset classes. “the expectereturn of the mestic bonasset class is the lowest of the asset classes”这句话有什么用没有,好像在公式里不体现啊

2024-04-22 23:17 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000107 问题如下 In the risk parity asset allocation approathMüller uses, the weight thMüller places on mestic bon shoulbe: A.less th25%. B.equto 25%. C.greater th25%. C is correct. A risk parity asset allocation is baseon the notion theaasset class shoulcontribute equally to the totrisk of the portfolio. Bon have the lowest risk level anmust contribute 25% of the portfolio’s totrisk, so bon must overweighte(greater th25%). The equcontribution of eaasset class is calculateas:wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2 wherewi = weight of asset iCov(ri,rp) = covarianof asset i with the portfolion = number of assetsσ2= varianof the portfolioIn this example, there are four asset classes, anthe varianof the totportfolio is assumeto 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to eaasset class is expecteto contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the totvariance. Because bon have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk the other asset classes. 如题

2023-06-16 15:22 1 · 回答