开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Stella · 2024年07月28日

辨析类似题型

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202206140600000203

问题如下:

Chasing Alpha Research Case Scenario

Ben McNeil works as a senior manager at Chasing Alpha Research (CAR), a boutique investment house that specializes in managing portfolios for endowment funds. For the past year, CAR has been developing a machine learning (ML) algorithm that leverages frequently updated internal data (e.g., security weights, trades, and returns) and external data sources to construct individual stock portfolios within a pre-determined sector allocation range (–5% to +5% of benchmark). The goal of the portfolio is to outperform the benchmark over a 12-month period, and McNeil is reviewing the performance results to evaluate the effectiveness of the big data strategy. Attribution results for the portfolio are provided in Exhibit 1.

Exhibit 1.

Attribution Results of the ML Tool-Based Portfolio Return Using the Brinson Model


McNeil considers which appraisal method should be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the ML tool. He selects a portfolio constructed by the ML tool based on the investment mandate provided by one of CAR’s clients with the following characteristics: moderate to high risk tolerance and a preference for a short-term return that is 1.5% above the risk-free rate.

In discussing the portfolio’s performance with a colleague, the following statements are made:

Statement 1:The excess return of the portfolio is almost entirely driven by the selection and interaction performance of the financial services sector.

Statement 2:The decision to underweight the health care sector was not beneficial.

Statement 3:The decision to underweight the consumer goods sector was beneficial given the net contribution of 0.41% to the excess return.

In reviewing the overall technology sector return, McNeil realized that a large portion of the return was driven by a decision to sell an equivalent dollar amount of Gamma Technology Inc. and buy Epsilon Blockchain Co., which outperformed the market. Without this trade, the portfolio’s technology sector return would have only been 12.50%. He decides to calculate the associated selection and interaction measure had that trade not occurred.

Question


In the discussion between McNeil and his colleague about the portfolio performance shown in Exhibit 1, the most accurate statement is:

选项:

A.Statement 1. B.Statement 2. C.Statement 3.

解释:

Solution

B is correct. The decision to underweight the health care sector was not beneficial, because the allocation contribution to the excess return is negative (–0.16%).

A is incorrect. Although the financial services sector performed well, it is the technology sector performance that provided the largest contribution to the excess return of the portfolio.

C is incorrect. The decision to underweight the consumer goods sector negatively affected the excess return (–0.15%), which is not a benefit.

选项b的health care sector因为benchmark表现不如组合平均,所以如果用BH模型来看,其实是beneficiary,但是也理解老师所讲解的这道题的理解思路为因为health care整体收益为正,所以低配就not beneficiary。

有一道类似的原版书课后题就是在问对不同国家allocation的效果所给组合带来的影响,就考虑了不同板块benchmark的收益与组合平均收益间的大小关系。

请问考试的时候应该怎么区分到底从哪个角度出发呢?硬要说的话就是a和c错的更彻底,b还有一个不同理解角度出发的回旋余地。。

1 个答案
已采纳答案

吴昊_品职助教 · 2024年07月29日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


本题关键词:overweight/underweight。因为考虑的是weight,所以考虑的是allocation effect。

1、这道题allocation effect的具体数值已经算出来了,直接读取数据即可。-0.16%代表allocation effect是不好的。医药的underweight,造成了的Allocation效应为-0.16%,说明underweight的收益的负的。收益的负的,因此是not beneficial整体组合的。

2、如果没有给出allocation effect的具体数值,那我们就需要进行计算。(类似于我们的课后题),那就需要自己去计算allocation effect。就需要去比较benchmark收益和组合平均收益。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 996

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202206140600000203 问题如下 In the scussion between McNeil anhis colleague about the portfolio performanshown in Exhibit 1, the most accurate statement is: A.Statement 1. B.Statement 2. C.Statement 3. SolutionB is correct. The cision to unrweight the health care sector wnot beneficial, because the allocation contribution to the excess return is negative (–0.16%). A is incorrect. Although the financiservices sector performewell, it is the technology sector performanthprovithe largest contribution to the excess return of the portfolio. C is incorrect. The cision to unrweight the consumer goo sector negatively affectethe excess return (–0.15%), whiis not a benefit. 老师,下午好,请问,c为什么是错的,低配它的结果,确实是给组合的净收益带来了0.41%的正收益哎?

2024-01-27 15:25 2 · 回答

NO.PZ202206140600000203 问题如下 In the scussion between McNeil anhis colleague about the portfolio performanshown in Exhibit 1, the most accurate statement is: A.Statement 1. B.Statement 2. C.Statement 3. SolutionB is correct. The cision to unrweight the health care sector wnot beneficial, because the allocation contribution to the excess return is negative (–0.16%). A is incorrect. Although the financiservices sector performewell, it is the technology sector performanthprovithe largest contribution to the excess return of the portfolio. C is incorrect. The cision to unrweight the consumer goo sector negatively affectethe excess return (–0.15%), whiis not a benefit. health care的benchmark return小于整体benchmark return,unrweight为什么not beneficial整体组合呢?

2023-05-05 16:08 2 · 回答