开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

cst6666 · 2024年07月11日

AC 不太理解

NO.PZ2023021602000056

问题如下:

Tonya Tucker, CFA, is a financial analyst at Bowron Consolidated. Bowron has numerous subsidiaries and is actively involved in mergers and acquisitions to expand its businesses. Tucker analyzes a number of companies, including Hanchin Corporation. When Tucker speaks with the CEO of Bowron, she indicates many of the companies she has looked at would be attractive acquisition targets for Bowron. After her discussion with the CEO, Tucker purchases 100,000 shares of Hanchin Corporation at $200 per share. Bowron does not have any pre-clearance procedures, so the next time she meets with the CEO, Tucker mentions she owns shares of Hanchin. The CEO thanks her for this information but does not ask for any details. Two weeks later, Tucker sees a companywide e-mail from the CEO announcing Bowron's acquisition of Hanchin for $250 a share. In regard to her purchase of Hanchin stock, Tucker least likely violated the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct concerning:

选项:

A.Priority of Transactions. B.Loyalty. C.Material Nonpublic Information.

解释:

There is no indication the analyst had access to material nonpublic information and was in violation of Standard II(A): Material Nonpublic Information. Specifically, Tucker did not have information concerning any decision by Bowron to acquire Hanchin stock because she is not a part of Bowron's decision-making team that determines the companies it plans to take over. The analyst had indicated numerous companies were viable options for take over, and she did not single out any one company in particular. However, trading the stock of a company the analyst recommended as an acquisition candidate does violate Standard IV(A): Loyalty because she did not give her employer the opportunity to take advantage of her skill/recommendation prior to buying the shares for her own portfolio. In addition, the analyst violated Standard VI(B): Priority of Transactions, which requires that investment transactions for clients and employers must have priority over investment transactions in which a member or candidate is the beneficial owner despite the fact that there are no stock pre-clearance procedures at Bowron.

However, trading the stock of a company the analyst recommended as an acquisition candidate does violate Standard IV(A): Loyalty because she did not give her employer the opportunity to take advantage of her skill/recommendation prior to buying the shares for her own portfolio. In addition, the analyst violated Standard VI(B): Priority of Transactions, which requires that investment transactions for clients and employers must have priority over investment transactions in which a member or candidate is the beneficial owner despite the fact that there are no stock pre-clearance procedures at Bowron.


这段话有点不太明白

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年07月11日

A. Priority of Transactions(交易优先级):

这个标准规定,客户和雇主的投资交易必须优先于成员或候选人作为受益人的投资交易。在这个案例中,Tonya Tucker作为Bowron Consolidated的金融分析师,向CEO推荐了几家公司作为潜在的收购目标,其中包括Hanchin Corporation。然而,在推荐之后,她自己购买了Hanchin的股票,而没有先让她的雇主Bowron有机会利用她的技能或推荐进行投资。这违反了“交易优先级”的标准,因为她应该先考虑雇主的利益,再考虑自己的个人利益。


C. Material Nonpublic Information(重大非公开信息):

这个标准规定,成员或候选人不得基于重大非公开信息进行交易。在这个案例中,没有迹象表明Tucker掌握了关于Bowron决定收购Hanchin股票的任何重大非公开信息。她并不是Bowron决策团队的一部分,也没有特别指出哪一家公司会被收购。因此,她购买Hanchin股票的行为并不构成基于重大非公开信息的交易,所以她没有违反这一标准。

综上所述,Tucker的行为违反了“忠诚度”和“交易优先级”的标准,但没有违反“重大非公开信息”的标准。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 190

    浏览
相关问题