开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

dilly24 · 2024年07月08日

为什么没有违反?

NO.PZ2016040303000040

问题如下:

Townsend was recently appointed to the board of directors of a youth golf program that is the local chapter of a national not-for-profit organization. The program is beginning a new fund-raising campaign to expand the number of annual scholarships it provides. Townsend believes many of her clients make annual donations to charity. The next week in her regular newsletter to all clients, she includes a small section discussing the fundraising campaign and her position on the organization’s board.

选项:

A.

Townsend did not violate the Code and Standards.

B.

Townsend violated the Code and Standards by soliciting donations from her clients through the newsletter.

C.

Townsend violated the Code and Standards by not getting approval of the organization before soliciting her clients.

解释:

A is correct.

Answer Townsend has not provided any information about her clients to the leaders or managers of the golf program; thus, she has not violated Standard III(E) – Preservation of Confidentiality. Providing contact information about her clients for a direct-mail solicitation would have been a violation. Answer B is incorrect because the notice in the newsletter does not violate Standard III(E). Answer C is incorrect because the golf program’s fund-raising campaign had already begun, so discussing the opportunity to donate was appropriate.

她利用公司渠道发邮件给客户募集捐款,这个不是以权谋私吗?为什么没有违反呢?客户可能是因为信任公司这个品牌所以也会信任这个募捐,如果最后被发现募捐有问题(假募捐之类的),不是伤害了公司的声誉吗?

2 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年07月26日

请教一下,从题干中哪里可以看出,这道题考的是“保密性保护”的准则?

在这道题中,考察“保密性保护”的准则主要体现在对Townsend行为的评估上。题干提到Townsend在她的常规新闻通讯中加入了一个小部分,讨论筹款活动和她在组织董事会上的职位。关键在于理解Townsend是否在这一过程中违反了与客户信息保密相关的职业操守。


题干中并没有直接提及“保密性保护”这一术语,但是通过评估Townsend的行为是否涉及未经授权地分享客户信息(特别是如果她提供了客户的联系方式用于直接邮件募捐),可以间接推断出这一点。由于Townsend没有提供任何关于她客户的信息给高尔夫项目的领导或管理者,因此她没有违反与客户信息保密相关的准则。

所以,虽然题干没有直接提到“保密性保护”的准则,但是通过分析Townsend的行为是否涉及保护客户信息的机密性,可以推断出这道题目实际上是在考察这一准则。

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年07月08日

Townsend并没有提供客户的任何信息给高尔夫项目的领导或管理者,因此她没有违反“保密性保护”的准则。而且,她只是在通讯中提及了筹款活动和她在该组织的职位,并没有直接要求客户捐款,所以并不算是以权谋私。

至于你提到的“以权谋私”和“伤害公司声誉”的问题,这主要取决于Townsend的具体行为和通讯的内容。如果她只是在通讯中提及了筹款活动和她在该组织的职位,而没有利用她的职位或公司的渠道强制或诱导客户捐款,那么这并不构成以权谋私。同时,如果她确保筹款活动的真实性和合法性,那么也不会对公司的声誉造成伤害。当然,如果她的行为超出了这个范围,比如直接利用公司渠道向客户募捐或者隐瞒筹款活动的真实情况,那么就可能违反职业道德和行为准则,甚至可能对公司的声誉造成伤害。但在这个问题中,我们并没有得到这样的信息,所以我们只能根据给定的信息进行判断。

yinyincat · 2024年07月26日

请教一下,从题干中哪里可以看出,这道题考的是“保密性保护”的准则?

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 214

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2016040303000040 问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boar A.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr. B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter. C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients. A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate. 工作邮件里面发私人request里面为什么是没有违反职业道德啊?

2024-01-24 15:55 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boarA.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr.B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter.C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients.A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate.做募捐不需要取得公司的同意吗?

2022-11-28 10:46 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040 问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boar A.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr. B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter. C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients. A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate. 客户捐款的话,不是会导致雇主的AUM下降么..这不算利益冲突么

2022-08-01 21:21 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040 这句话没有理解 为啥已经开始了再scuss是ok的 这个关系到哪条准则

2021-11-15 02:11 10 · 回答