开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Horatio · 2024年07月01日

书上关于这里写的是consequence而不是reason

NO.PZ2024021802000070

问题如下:

Which of the following is least likely a reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from different providers is low?

选项:

A.The way ESG ratings are produced is evolving B.ESG factor identification is up to the rating providers C.ESG performance is not adequately reflected in stock prices

解释:

A. Incorrect because this is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from different providers is low. All main providers’ processes continue to evolve. This evolving process also makes historic comparisons difficult. The different methodologies might also mean like-for-like comparisons are not being made in the correlations between rating agencies (which means changes to ESG rating methodologies reduce correlations between ratings from different agencies).

B. Incorrect because the fact that ESG factors are identified by rating providers is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from different providers is low. ESG factor identification is up to the rating provider; therefore, dispersal of opinions starts even before consideration of different weighting and scoring methodologies.

C. Correct because the fact that ESG performance is not adequately reflected in stock prices is a potential consequence of low correlations between the ratings of different ESG rating providers; it is not a reason for these low correlations. ESG performance is less likely to be reflected in corporate stock and bond prices, as investors face a challenge when trying to identify outperformers and laggards. Even if a large fraction of investors has a preference for ESG performance, the divergence of the ratings disperses the effect of these preferences on asset prices.

不反应在股价上应该是后果才对,为什么这道题问原因也选C

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2024年07月02日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


题目问的是最不可能的原因 least likely a reason,C选项的确是结果,所以选C

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 209

    浏览
相关问题

题干错误

2024-08-02 09:37 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000070 问题如下 Whiof the following is least likely a reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low? A.The wESG ratings are proceis evolving B.ESG factor intification is up to the rating provirs C.ESG performanis not aquately reflectein stoprices Incorrebecause this is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low. All main provirs’ processes continue to evolve. This evolving process also makes historic comparisons fficult. The fferent methologies might also melike-for-like comparisons are not being ma in the correlations between rating agencies (whimeans changes to ESG rating methologies recorrelations between ratings from fferent agencies).Incorrebecause the fathESG factors are intifierating provirs is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low. ESG factor intification is up to the rating provir; therefore, spersof opinions starts even before consiration of fferent weighting anscoring methologies.Correbecause the fathESG performanis not aquately reflectein stoprices is a potenticonsequenof low correlations between the ratings of fferent ESG rating provirs; it is not a reason for these low correlations. ESG performanis less likely to reflectein corporate stoanbonprices, investors faa challenge when trying to intify outperformers anlaggar. Even if a large fraction of investors ha preferenfor ESG performance, the vergenof the ratings sperses the effeof these preferences on asset prices. 为什么A会导致评级不同?逻辑上请说明下

2024-05-23 20:47 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000070问题如下 Whiof the following is least likely a reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low?A.The wESG ratings are proceis evolvingB.ESG factor intification is up to the rating provirsC.ESG performanis not aquately reflectein stoprices Incorrebecause this is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low. All main provirs’ processes continue to evolve. This evolving process also makes historic comparisons fficult. The fferent methologies might also melike-for-like comparisons are not being ma in the correlations between rating agencies (whimeans changes to ESG rating methologies recorrelations between ratings from fferent agencies).Incorrebecause the fathESG factors are intifierating provirs is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low. ESG factor intification is up to the rating provir; therefore, spersof opinions starts even before consiration of fferent weighting anscoring methologies.Correbecause the fathESG performanis not aquately reflectein stoprices is a potenticonsequenof low correlations between the ratings of fferent ESG rating provirs; it is not a reason for these low correlations. ESG performanis less likely to reflectein corporate stoanbonprices, investors faa challenge when trying to intify outperformers anlaggar. Even if a large fraction of investors ha preferenfor ESG performance, the vergenof the ratings sperses the effeof these preferences on asset prices. 請問為什麼C是對? 能詳細解釋一下嗎?

2024-04-08 13:24 1 · 回答