开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

506623496 · 2024年06月30日

题目正文解读

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201803130100000107

问题如下:

In the risk parity asset allocation approach that Müller uses, the weight that Müller places on domestic bonds should be:

选项:

A.

less than 25%.

B.

equal to 25%.

C.

greater than 25%.

解释:

C is correct.

A risk parity asset allocation is based on the notion that each asset class should contribute equally to the total risk of the portfolio. Bonds have the lowest risk level and must contribute 25% of the portfolio’s total risk, so bonds must be overweighted (greater than 25%). The equal contribution of each asset class is calculated as:

wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2

where

wi = weight of asset i

Cov(ri,rp) = covariance of asset i with the portfolio

n = number of assets

σ2= variance of the portfolio

In this example, there are four asset classes, and the variance of the total portfolio is assumed to be 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to each asset class is expected to contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the total variance. Because bonds have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk as the other asset classes.

明白本题原理,对于文中提法有疑惑

1.. The expected return of the domestic bond asset class is the lowest of the asset classes,

本句只说了domestic bond return最小,没有说risk最小,是据此退出的risk最小?


2.and the returns of the domestic bond asset class have the lowest covariance with other asset class returns.

domestic bond 和其他资产的协方差最小,没有说公式里的和组合的协方差最小,怎么推出?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2024年07月02日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


1、是的,风险和收益一般来说成正比


2、确实是推出来的,但是并不严谨the returns of the domestic bond asset class have the lowest covariance with other asset class returns的确可是domestic asset与portfolio中的其他资产的协方差低,那么如果要得到domestic asset与portfolio 的协方差低,还要方差统计量,但如果这样的话,这道题就没法解了。

而这道题考的知识点是ACTR1=ACTR2=...以及ACTR=wi*Cov(Ri,Rp)两个公式,如果把the returns of the domestic bond asset class have the lowest covariance with other asset class returns理解成Cov(Ri,Rp)最小,才能选出答案。

考试中应该不会有这种模棱两可的表达,万一出现了,而有没有单个资产的方差信息,那么为了解题,也只能按照cov(Ri,Rp)最小来理解了。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 105

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201803130100000107 问题如下 In the risk parity asset allocation approathMüller uses, the weight thMüller places on mestic bon shoulbe: A.less th25%. B.equto 25%. C.greater th25%. C is correct. A risk parity asset allocation is baseon the notion theaasset class shoulcontribute equally to the totrisk of the portfolio. Bon have the lowest risk level anmust contribute 25% of the portfolio’s totrisk, so bon must overweighte(greater th25%). The equcontribution of eaasset class is calculateas:wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2 wherewi = weight of asset iCov(ri,rp) = covarianof asset i with the portfolion = number of assetsσ2= varianof the portfolioIn this example, there are four asset classes, anthe varianof the totportfolio is assumeto 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to eaasset class is expecteto contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the totvariance. Because bon have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk the other asset classes. 为什么 varianof totportfolio = 25%? 1/n * portfolio varian= w * covariance, 1/n * portfolio varian= actr, 那么 w * covarian= actr 么?如果是的话, 应该怎么理解这个公式呢?

2024-08-04 07:32 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000107 问题如下 In the risk parity asset allocation approathMüller uses, the weight thMüller places on mestic bon shoulbe: A.less th25%. B.equto 25%. C.greater th25%. C is correct. A risk parity asset allocation is baseon the notion theaasset class shoulcontribute equally to the totrisk of the portfolio. Bon have the lowest risk level anmust contribute 25% of the portfolio’s totrisk, so bon must overweighte(greater th25%). The equcontribution of eaasset class is calculateas:wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2 wherewi = weight of asset iCov(ri,rp) = covarianof asset i with the portfolion = number of assetsσ2= varianof the portfolioIn this example, there are four asset classes, anthe varianof the totportfolio is assumeto 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to eaasset class is expecteto contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the totvariance. Because bon have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk the other asset classes. “the expectereturn of the mestic bonasset class is the lowest of the asset classes”这句话有什么用没有,好像在公式里不体现啊

2024-04-22 23:17 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000107 问题如下 In the risk parity asset allocation approathMüller uses, the weight thMüller places on mestic bon shoulbe: A.less th25%. B.equto 25%. C.greater th25%. C is correct. A risk parity asset allocation is baseon the notion theaasset class shoulcontribute equally to the totrisk of the portfolio. Bon have the lowest risk level anmust contribute 25% of the portfolio’s totrisk, so bon must overweighte(greater th25%). The equcontribution of eaasset class is calculateas:wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2 wherewi = weight of asset iCov(ri,rp) = covarianof asset i with the portfolion = number of assetsσ2= varianof the portfolioIn this example, there are four asset classes, anthe varianof the totportfolio is assumeto 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to eaasset class is expecteto contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the totvariance. Because bon have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk the other asset classes. 如题

2023-06-16 15:22 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000107 问题如下 MegBea anHanna Müller are senior analysts for a large, multi-visionmoney management firm. Bea supports the institutionportfolio managers, anMüller es the same for the private wealth portfolio managers.Bea reviews the asset allocation in Exhibit 1, rivefrom a mean–varianoptimization (MVO) mol for institutionclient, noting thtails of the MVO are lacking.Exhibit1 Asset Allocation anMarket Weights(in percent)The firm’s poliis to rebalana portfolio when the asset class weight falls outsi of a corrir arounthe target allocation. The wih of eacorrir is customizefor eaclient anproportionto the target allocation. Bea recommen wir corrir wihs for high-risk asset classes, narrower corrir wihs for less liquiasset classes, annarrower corrir wihs for taxable clients with high capitgains trates.One client sponsors a finebenefit pension plwhere the present value of the liabilities is $241 million anthe market value of plassets is $205 million. Bea expects interest rates to rise anboth the present value of plliabilities anthe market value of plassets to crease $25 million, changing the pension plan’s funng ratio.Bea uses a surplus optimization approato liability-relative asset allocation baseon the objective function Um =E (Rm) - 0.005λσm2where E(Rs,m) is the expectesurplus return for portfolio m, λ is the risk aversion coefficient, anσ2(Rs,m) is the varianof the surplus return. Bea establishes the expectesurplus return ansurplus varianfor three fferent asset allocations, shown in Exhibit 2. Given λ = 1.50, she chooses the optimasset mix.Exhibit 2 ExpecteSurplus Return anVolatility for Three PortfoliosClient Haunani Kealoha ha large fixeobligation e in 10 years. Bea assesses thKealoha hsubstantially more fun thare requireto meet the fixeobligation. The client wants to earn a competitive risk-austerate of return while maintaining a high level of certainty ththere will sufficient assets to meet the fixeobligation.In the private wealth arethe firm hsignefive sub-portfolios with ffering asset allocations thare useto funfferent client goals over a five-yehorizon. Exhibit 3 shows the expectereturns anvolatilities of the sub-portfolios anthe probabilities ththe sub-portfolios will exceeexpecteminimum return. Client Luis Roíguez wants to satisfy two goals. Go1 requires a conservative portfolio proving the highest possible minimum return thwill met least 95% of the time. Go2 requires a riskier portfolio thprovis the highest minimum return thwill exceeleast 85% of the time.Exhibit3 Characteristiof Sub-portfoliosMüller uses a risk parity asset allocation approawith a client’s four–asset class portfolio. The expectereturn of the mestic bonasset class is the lowest of the asset classes, anthe returns of the mestic bonasset class have the lowest covarianwith other asset class returns. Müller estimates the weight thshoulplaceon mestic bon.Müller ana client scuss other approaches to asset allocation thare not baseon optimization mols or goals-basemols. Müller makes the following comments to the client:Comment 1 aantage of the \"120 minus your age\" heuristic over the 60/40 stock/bonheuristic is thit incorporates age-basestock/bonallocation.Comment 2 The Yale mol emphasizes trationinvestments ana commitment to active management.Comment 3 A client’s asset allocation using the 1/N rule pen on the investment characteristiof eaasset class. In the risk parity asset allocation approathMüller uses, the weight thMüller places on mestic bon shoulbe: A.less th25%. B.equto 25%. C.greater th25%. C is correct. A risk parity asset allocation is baseon the notion theaasset class shoulcontribute equally to the totrisk of the portfolio. Bon have the lowest risk level anmust contribute 25% of the portfolio’s totrisk, so bon must overweighte(greater th25%). The equcontribution of eaasset class is calculateas:wi* Cov(ri,rp)=1nδρ2 wherewi = weight of asset iCov(ri,rp) = covarianof asset i with the portfolion = number of assetsσ2= varianof the portfolioIn this example, there are four asset classes, anthe varianof the totportfolio is assumeto 25%; therefore, using a risk parity approach, the allocation to eaasset class is expecteto contribute (1/4 × 25%) = 6.25% of the totvariance. Because bon have the lowest covariance, they must have a higher relative weight to achieve the same contribution to risk the other asset classes. 老师,看了答案和类似问题的回答,还是不太明白,怎么算出总的varian=25%,每个资产对于风险的贡献度一样,一共有4个资产,那是每个资产对于风险的贡献度=25%,不是总的variance=25%啊

2022-05-02 10:29 1 · 回答