开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

yj2640 · 2024年06月29日

关于LDI的理解

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202301040900001002

问题如下:

(2) Recommend a new investment approach based for the Whatsit’s pension plan that is most likely to outperform the market. Justify your response and identify one advantage and one disadvantage of this approach.

选项:

解释:

Whatsit should use the endowment model.

Justification (either two of these is acceptable):

Ÿ Long time horizon

Ÿ High risk tolerance

Ÿ Relatively small liquidity needs

Ÿ Stuart’s experience with external managers to help with investment

Advantage:

Ÿ Ability to capture alpha and outperform the market over a long-time horizon, that is, high value-added potential.

Disadvantages (either one of these is acceptable):

Ÿ The endowment model is costly because of high alternative exposure, active management and outsourcing compared to a passive approach.

Difficult to implement if fund has large asset size.

老师您好,我在这个题中选了LDI,看了以前的回答,是因为LDI不太会给出高回报所以才不选吗?

以及一般来说跟Norway对比的一定是Endowment?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2024年06月30日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


同学你好:


这几种机构投资者的投资方式,其实对比起来很简单,其中:

Norway 和 Endowment 、canada 相比,就是Norway 几乎不投alternative,而Endowment 、canada 都会大量的投资alternative;

而Endowment 和canada 相比,Canada model是Internally managed,就是内部管理的。

Endowment和Canada model整体类似,但是Endowment model是Outsourced,也就是外包管理的。

开头的这句话:“Stuart has significant experience with pension plans and an extensive knowledge of external managers”,意思是Stuart 在养老金管理中,如何挑选合适的外部经理方面,有丰富的经验和知识。并不是说他适合自己内部管理养老金。

具体的对比,同学可以参考下面的截图。


Liability-Driven investing,以负债为目标的投资策略。LDI的具体方法就是:免疫策略(Immunization策略)特别是针对养老金计划等长期负债的投资组合。它的特征和Norway 比较类似,最大的作用是cover liability, 但是在大程度的underfunded的状态,LDI并不适用。



----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 212

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202301040900001002 问题如下 (2) Recommena new investment approabasefor the Whatsit’s pension plthatis most likely to outperform the market. Justify your response anintifyone aantage anone saantage of this approach. Whatsit shouluse the enwment mol.Justification (either two of these is acceptable):Ÿ Long time horizonŸ High risk toleranceŸ Relatively small liquity neeŸ Stuart’s experienwith externmanagers to help with investmentAantage:Ÿ Ability to capture alpha anoutperform the market over a long-time horizon, this, high value-aepotential.saantages (either one of these is acceptable):Ÿ The enwment mol is costly because of high alternative exposure, active management anoutsourcing compareto a passive approach.fficult to implement if funhlarge asset size. 老师,可否请您看一下我答案的分析,我看了答案还是没想明白为什么是enwment,我看了题干,觉得信息都在偏向L呀?The new approaaisemthe L mol. Because there is 5% legspenng neefor the benefit payments for the retireemployees, the firm inenee to invest in some of fixeincome securities in the reserve portfolio. Although the plis unrfunnow, the firm remains the market lear anha strong financisituation, allowing to contribute the plin time.Meanwhile, the company hires many young workers in orr to make the average age of the workforremain low, leang to a less mature pension plan. So there is low liquity nee anhigh risk tolerance. the recent clining sales, the firm shoulconsir making the growth of assets higher thgrowth of liabilities, so it is urgent to invest in alternatives or riskier securities in return seeking portfolio in pursuit of above-market returns.

2024-07-17 17:51 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202301040900001002 问题如下 (2) Recommena new investment approabasefor the Whatsit’s pension plthatis most likely to outperform the market. Justify your response anintifyone aantage anone saantage of this approach. Whatsit shouluse the enwment mol.Justification (either two of these is acceptable):Ÿ Long time horizonŸ High risk toleranceŸ Relatively small liquity neeŸ Stuart’s experienwith externmanagers to help with investmentAantage:Ÿ Ability to capture alpha anoutperform the market over a long-time horizon, this, high value-aepotential.saantages (either one of these is acceptable):Ÿ The enwment mol is costly because of high alternative exposure, active management anoutsourcing compareto a passive approach.fficult to implement if funhlarge asset size. 请问一下老师,为什么不能这么理解呢因为case中提到,这个单位on the verge of becoming unrfun我理解应该避免管理费用高的approach,同时case开头提到Stuart hsignificant experienwith pension plans anextensive knowlee of externmanagers,说明internal的方式是可行的,所以相比于enwment mol,Canamol更合适

2024-05-22 23:55 3 · 回答

NO.PZ202301040900001002 问题如下 (2) Recommena new investment approabasefor the Whatsit’s pension plthatis most likely to outperform the market. Justify your response anintifyone aantage anone saantage of this approach. Whatsit shouluse the enwment mol.Justification (either two of these is acceptable):Ÿ Long time horizonŸ High risk toleranceŸ Relatively small liquity neeŸ Stuart’s experienwith externmanagers to help with investmentAantage:Ÿ Ability to capture alpha anoutperform the market over a long-time horizon, this, high value-aepotential.saantages (either one of these is acceptable):Ÿ The enwment mol is costly because of high alternative exposure, active management anoutsourcing compareto a passive approach.fficult to implement if funhlarge asset size. the new apprarecommenis Enwment Mol. the reasons are following:1.Enwment approais outsoucing.Stuart hextensive knowlee of externmanagers, whimeet the Enwment approach's character.2.Enwment approais active management. Whatsit’s boarasks Stuart to look into a new investment approathcoulpotentially outperform the market. Enwment approahave high value-aes potencial.3.Enwment approais characterizehigh alternative exposure. anaverage age of the workforremains low anthe firm’s balansheet hlow to equity ratios, so the pension funhlow liquity nee anhigh risk tolerananlong investment horizon, so cinvest alternative.aantage:have a high value-aepotentialavatange:costly annot transparantis fficult to unrstanimplement

2024-02-09 07:31 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202301040900001002 问题如下 (2) Recommena new investment approabasefor the Whatsit’s pension plthatis most likely to outperform the market. Justify your response anintifyone aantage anone saantage of this approach. Whatsit shouluse the enwment mol.Justification (either two of these is acceptable):Ÿ Long time horizonŸ High risk toleranceŸ Relatively small liquity neeŸ Stuart’s experienwith externmanagers to help with investmentAantage:Ÿ Ability to capture alpha anoutperform the market over a long-time horizon, this, high value-aepotential.saantages (either one of these is acceptable):Ÿ The enwment mol is costly because of high alternative exposure, active management anoutsourcing compareto a passive approach.fficult to implement if funhlarge asset size. why the L mol is not the recommenmol?

2023-06-23 09:43 1 · 回答