开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

wukefu · 2024年06月28日

权重策略的记忆

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201809170400000603

问题如下:

Ayanna Chen is a portfolio manager at Aycrig Fund, where she supervises assistant portfolio manager Mordechai Garcia. Aycrig Fund invests money for high-net-worth and institutional investors. Chen asks Garcia to analyze certain information relating to Aycrig Fund’s three submanagers, Managers A, B, and C.

Manager A has $250 million in assets under management (AUM), an active risk of 5%, an information coefficient of 0.15, and a transfer coefficient of 0.40. Manager A’s portfolio has a 2.5% expected active return this year.

Chen directs Garcia to determine the maximum position size that Manager A can hold in shares of Pasliant Corporation, which has a market capitalization of $3.0 billion, an index weight of 0.20%, and an average daily trading volume (ADV) of 1% of its market capitalization.

Manager A has the following position size policy constraints:

Allocation: No investment in any security may represent more than 3% of total AUM.

Liquidity: No position size may represent more than 10% of the dollar value of the security’s ADV.

Index weight: The maximum position weight must be less than or equal to 10 times the security’s weight in the index.

Manager B holds a highly diversified portfolio that has balanced exposures to rewarded risk factors, high active share, and a relatively low active risk target.

Selected data on Manager C’s portfolio, which contains three assets, is presented in Exhibit 1.

Chen considers adding a fourth sub-manager and evaluates three managers’ portfolios, Portfolios X, Y, and Z. The managers for Portfolios X, Y, and Z all have similar costs, fees, and alpha skills, and their factor exposures align with both Aycrig’s and investors’ expectations and constraints. The portfolio factor exposures, risk contributions, and risk characteristics are presented in Exhibits 2 and 3.

Chen and Garcia next discuss characteristics of long–short and long-only investing. Garcia makes the following statements about investing with long–short and long-only managers:

Statement 1 A long–short portfolio allows for a gross exposure of 100%.

Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity than other approaches, particularly when using strategies that focus on large-cap stocks.

Chen and Garcia then turn their attention to portfolio management approaches.Chen prefers an approach that emphasizes security-specific factors, engages in factor timing, and typically leads to portfolios that are generally more concentrated than those built using a systematic approach.


Manager B’s portfolio is most likely consistent with the characteristics of a:

选项:

A.

pure indexer.

B.

sector rotator.

C.

multi-factor manager.

解释:

C is correct. Most multi-factor products are diversified across factors and securities and typically have high active share but have reasonably low active risk (tracking error), often in the range of 3%. Most multi-factor products have a low concentration among securities in order to achieve a balanced exposure to risk factors and minimize idiosyncratic risks. Manager B holds a highly diversified portfolio that has balanced exposures to rewarded risk factors, a high active share, and a relatively low target active risk—consistent with the characteristics of a multi-factor manager.

书本上权重策略说了6种,是否可以按照已下归类

  1. Active risk 和Active share 都高:concentrated stock picks & concentrated factor(也叫sector rotator)
  2. Active risk 低,active share 高:diversified factor(也叫multiple factor) & netural factor and diversifed stock picks
  3. Acitve riks 低,active share 低: closet indexing & pure indexing


另外,每一种策略是否有别名啊?

2 个答案
已采纳答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年06月28日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


Hello,亲爱的同学~

权重策略有两套体系。

也是基础讲义191页例题的体系:


二是基础讲义186页正文的体系。


每个策略都没有别名。

解题的时候,建议这两套体系,同学分开记忆,尽量不去混用。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年06月29日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


那么这两套体系的联系


原版书并未涉及两者联系,因此解题时候也是分开处理


一定要说联系的话,老师的理解如下:


diversified multi factor可以理解为factor neutral and diversified stock pick


sector rotator可以理解为是diversified factor bets 和factor neutral and diversifed stock picks 的结合


因为联系这一块并无官方标准答案,所以其实每个人都可以有自己的理解。最终只要有助于解题就可以。





----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 337

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201809170400000603 问题如下 Manager B’s portfolio is most likely consistent with the characteristiof A.pure inxer. B.sector rotator. C.multi-factor manager. C is correct. Most multi-factor procts are versifieacross factors ansecurities antypically have high active share but have reasonably low active risk (tracking error), often in the range of 3%. Most multi-factor procts have a low concentration among securities in orr to achieve a balanceexposure to risk factors anminimize iosyncratic risks. Manager B hol a highly versifieportfolio thhbalanceexposures to rewarrisk factors, a high active share, ana relatively low target active risk—consistent with the characteristiof a multi-factor manager. 请问这题的知识点在基础讲义里哪里出现了呀?我只看到这个图在基础讲义里。

2024-10-13 09:22 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000603 问题如下 Manager B’s portfolio is most likely consistent with the characteristiof A.pure inxer. B.sector rotator. C.multi-factor manager. C is correct. Most multi-factor procts are versifieacross factors ansecurities antypically have high active share but have reasonably low active risk (tracking error), often in the range of 3%. Most multi-factor procts have a low concentration among securities in orr to achieve a balanceexposure to risk factors anminimize iosyncratic risks. Manager B hol a highly versifieportfolio thhbalanceexposures to rewarrisk factors, a high active share, ana relatively low target active risk—consistent with the characteristiof a multi-factor manager. 1)sector rotator是否是对应在top-wn strategy里面的sector aninstry rotation的策略呢?2)multi-factor manager.是否是对应在 active share章节图表中的versifiefactor bets?因为这个三种类型无法在课件【权重策略】里面对应上,我的理解是,sector rotator 和 multi-factor 都是偏主动的策略,但是sector rotator比起multi-factor来说,active risk会更高,因为multi-factor主要还是集中在几个factor上面,所以排除法只能选multi-factor。请问一下老师,这个思路有没有什么问题?

2024-02-02 19:28 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000603 问题如下 Manager B’s portfolio is most likely consistent with the characteristiof A.pure inxer. B.sector rotator. C.multi-factor manager. C is correct. Most multi-factor procts are versifieacross factors ansecurities antypically have high active share but have reasonably low active risk (tracking error), often in the range of 3%. Most multi-factor procts have a low concentration among securities in orr to achieve a balanceexposure to risk factors anminimize iosyncratic risks. Manager B hol a highly versifieportfolio thhbalanceexposures to rewarrisk factors, a high active share, ana relatively low target active risk—consistent with the characteristiof a multi-factor manager. 请问老师sector rotator 代表上图里面的哪一种?

2023-05-06 21:57 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000603 问题如下 Manager B’s portfolio is most likely consistent with the characteristiof A.pure inxer. B.sector rotator. C.multi-factor manager. C is correct. Most multi-factor procts are versifieacross factors ansecurities antypically have high active share but have reasonably low active risk (tracking error), often in the range of 3%. Most multi-factor procts have a low concentration among securities in orr to achieve a balanceexposure to risk factors anminimize iosyncratic risks. Manager B hol a highly versifieportfolio thhbalanceexposures to rewarrisk factors, a high active share, ana relatively low target active risk—consistent with the characteristiof a multi-factor manager. 什么情况下Active Risk高而Active Share是低的?

2023-04-30 14:01 1 · 回答