开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

🍀 · 2024年06月23日

Notes 3怎么理解?

NO.PZ2023010903000008

问题如下:

Hans Smith, an Albright portfolio manager, makes the following notes after examining these funds:

Note 2 The DoGood Fund invests in Fleeker Corporation stock, which is rated high in the ESG space, and Fleeker’s pension fund has a significant investment in the DoGood Fund. This dynamic has the potential for a conflict of interest on the part of Fleeker Corporation but not for the DoGood Fund.

Note 3 The DoGood Fund’s portfolio manager has written policies stating that the fund does not engage in shareholder activism. Therefore, the DoGood Fund may be a free-rider on the activism by these shareholders.

Which of the following notes about the DoGood Fund is correct?

选项:

A.

Only Note 2

B.

Only Note 3

C.

Both Note 2 and Note 3

解释:

because the fund becomes a free-rider if it allows other shareholders to engage in actions that benefit the fund, and therefore Note 3 is correct. In theory, some investors could benefit from the shareholder engagement of others under the so-called “free rider problem.” Specifically, assume that a portfolio manager using an active strategy actively engages with a company to improve its operations and was successful in increasing the company’s stock price. The manager’s actions in this case improved the value of his portfolio and also benefitted other investors that own the same stock in their portfolios. Those investors that did not participate in shareholder engagement benefit from improved performance but without the costs necessary for engagement.

Note 2 is incorrect because a conflict of interest arises on the part of the DoGood Fund if it owns shares of a company that invests in the fund. Conflicts of interest can result for a company. For example, a portfolio manager could engage with a company that also happens to be an investor in the manager’s portfolio. In such a situation, a portfolio manager may be unduly influenced to support the company’s management so as not to jeopardize the company’s investment mandate with the portfolio manager.

Note 3 The DoGood Fund’s portfolio manager has written policies stating that the fund does not engage in shareholder activism. Therefore, the DoGood Fund may be a free-rider on the activism by these shareholders.怎么理解?


1 个答案
已采纳答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年06月24日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


Note 3 The DoGood Fund’s portfolio manager has written policies stating that the fund does not engage in shareholder activism. Therefore, the DoGood Fund may be a free-rider on the activism by these shareholders.怎么理解?


Hello,亲爱的同学~

一个公司有各种持股者,有的持股者出力,会督促管理层提升公司治理。

而有的持股者不出力,买入后不去过问公司经营和公司治理,只是单纯持股。

那么出力者提升公司治理后,公司股价上涨了,所有持股者,无论出力的还是不出力的,都获益。

这就是搭便车(free-rider)现象。


理解搭便车的名词后,我们结合本题。

这个基金已经明确,不会出力(does not engage in shareholder activism)。

因此,如果有其他持股者出力提升了公司治理,基金就会跟着一起获利。

没出力,但因为别人出力而获利,这个基金就属于may be a free-rider on the activism by these shareholders的情形。


----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 175

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023010903000008 问题如下 Hans Smith, Albright portfolio manager, makes the following notes after examining these fun:Note 2 The GooFuninvests in Fleeker Corporation stock, whiis ratehigh in the ESG space, anFleeker’s pension funha significant investment in the GooFun This namic hthe potentifor a confliof interest on the part of Fleeker Corporation but not for the GooFunNote 3 The GooFuns portfolio manager hwritten policies stating ththe funes not engage in shareholr activism. Therefore, the GooFunma free-rir on the activism these shareholrs.Whiof the following notes about the GooFunis correct? Only Note 2 Only Note 3 Both Note 2 anNote 3 because the funbecomes a free-rir if it allows other shareholrs to engage in actions thbenefit the fun antherefore Note 3 is correct. In theory, some investors coulbenefit from the shareholr engagement of others unr the so-calle“free rir problem.” Specifically, assume tha portfolio manager using active strategy actively engages with a company to improve its operations anwsuccessful in increasing the company’s stoprice. The manager’s actions in this case improvethe value of his portfolio analso benefitteother investors thown the same stoin their portfolios. Those investors thnot participate in shareholr engagement benefit from improveperformanbut without the costs necessary for engagement.Note 2 is incorrebecause a confliof interest arises on the part of the GooFunif it owns shares of a company thinvests in the fun Conflicts of interest cresult for a company. For example, a portfolio manager coulengage with a company thalso happens to investor in the manager’s portfolio. In sua situation, a portfolio manager munly influenceto support the company’s management so not to jeoparze the company’s investment mante with the portfolio manager. 老师请问是不是但凡是confliinterests, 一般都会涉及双方,而不会出现一方有但另一方没有被confliof interests影响的情况?

2024-06-22 19:12 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023010903000008问题如下 Hans Smith, Albright portfolio manager, makes the following notes after examining these fun:Note 2 The GooFuninvests in Fleeker Corporation stock, whiis ratehigh in the ESG space, anFleeker’s pension funha significant investment in the GooFun This namic hthe potentifor a confliof interest on the part of Fleeker Corporation but not for the GooFunNote 3 The GooFuns portfolio manager hwritten policies stating ththe funes not engage in shareholr activism. Therefore, the GooFunma free-rir on the activism these shareholrs.Whiof the following notes about the GooFunis correct? Only Note 2 Only Note 3Both Note 2 anNote 3 because the funbecomes a free-rir if it allows other shareholrs to engage in actions thbenefit the fun antherefore Note 3 is correct. In theory, some investors coulbenefit from the shareholr engagement of others unr the so-calle“free rir problem.” Specifically, assume tha portfolio manager using active strategy actively engages with a company to improve its operations anwsuccessful in increasing the company’s stoprice. The manager’s actions in this case improvethe value of his portfolio analso benefitteother investors thown the same stoin their portfolios. Those investors thnot participate in shareholr engagement benefit from improveperformanbut without the costs necessary for engagement.Note 2 is incorrebecause a confliof interest arises on the part of the GooFunif it owns shares of a company thinvests in the fun Conflicts of interest cresult for a company. For example, a portfolio manager coulengage with a company thalso happens to investor in the manager’s portfolio. In sua situation, a portfolio manager munly influenceto support the company’s management so not to jeoparze the company’s investment mante with the portfolio manager. 老师好,请问Note2为啥不对呢?

2024-01-10 08:36 2 · 回答