开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

大兵张嘎 · 2024年06月22日

保护现有小股东的权利，为什么也保护了机构投资者？？？

  1. ESG
  2. Governance factors

NO.PZ2022120701000045

问题如下：

The interests of institutional investors are most likely protected through:

选项：

A.pre-emptive rights.

B.related-party transactions.

C.dual-class share structures.

解释：

Pre-emptive rights ensure that investors, including institutional investors, can avoid dilution of their interest in a company by a dominant shareholder seeking to gain more control Both related-party transactions and dual-class share structures are disadvantageous to minority shareholders such as institutional investors, as they can enable dominant shareholders to siphon resources from the company or maintain disproportionate control of voting rights, respectively

有道题，强调这个措施是保护小股东的，为什么也是保护机构投资者。 准确的说，应该是保护原始股东的，和大小、机构都没有关系吧，总感觉逻辑有点混乱。求解释

添加评论
1 个答案

Tina_品职助教 · 2024年06月22日

嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：


机构投资者（如养老金基金、共同基金等）通常持众多公司的股份，但是相对各公司的持股比例却不一定大。相对于被投资公司来说，它们可能是一个小股东。预防性权利也保障了他们在公司发行新股时能够优先购买新股，保持其原有的持股比例和影响力。


预防性权利（Pre-emptive Rights）是一种给予现有股东的权利，让他们在公司发行新股时有优先购买新股的机会，以维持其原有的持股比例。这样可以防止现有股东的持股比例被稀释。

小股东通常没有足够的资金和影响力来在公司决策中占据主导地位。如果公司发行新股而小股东没有预防性权利，他们的持股比例就会被稀释，进而削弱他们在公司事务中的发言权和影响力。因此，预防性权利确保了小股东能够保持其在公司的持股比例，避免被大股东或新投资者稀释，从而保护他们的权利。


----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来，我们正在朝着它而去，加油！

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 147

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下 The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively​A的pre_emptive不是保护现有小股东的权利？为什么也保护了机构投资者？？？

2024-06-22 14:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively老师能具体讲讲B的情况吗？以及讲义哪里出现过？

2024-03-17 16:28 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively讲义里也提到了“al- class”对机构投资者也是useful的，我的理解是一人有多票的时候也是有利的，但只是早期有利。是这个原因不选C吗？

2024-03-08 07:52 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectivelyA的含义，以及思维导图里有么？

2024-02-28 20:57 1 · 回答