开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

139****0989 · 2024年06月20日

A为什么不对?

NO.PZ2024021802000073

问题如下:

When using standardized frameworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to:

选项:

A.include factors that are not financially material. B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments. C.consider different ESG factors for companies in the same sector.

解释:

A. Incorrect because materiality is typically measured in terms of both the likelihood and magnitude of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on material ESG factors. Determining which ESG issues are most material involves judgment and is not an exact science. Frameworks such as the materiality maps provided by SASB (now part of the ISSB) provide guidance, but investment professionals often develop their own view on what is most material.

B. Incorrect because various stakeholders do not agree on how to define or report materiality, so developing proprietary materiality assessments alongside standardized frameworks continues to be an important competency for investors.

C. Correct because material ESG factors differ by companies in different sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might be judged to have different material ESG factors. For instance, in the health care industry, a medical insurer will have different material factors than a pharmaceutical company. And even in the same industry, individual companies can have different material factors.

A为什么不对?

2 个答案

王岑 · 2024年10月22日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


standardized framework是指现有的ESG标准框架,比如说SASB、TCFD等,在这些标准框架下,A选项的这个说法本身就是错误的,因为在评估重要性的时候,是不需要考虑那些对财务不重要的因素的。

而在在排除性投资策略的情况下,考虑的因素不一定是财务上具有实质性的。排除性投资策略通常基于投资者的伦理信念、风险调整后的财务回报优化、或对系统性风险因素的考量,而不仅仅是基于财务实质性。例如,一些投资者可能会因为宗教或伦理原因排除某些行业,如赌博或酒精生产,而与这些行业的财务表现无关。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

王岑 · 2024年06月21日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


A选项说“ Include factors that are not financially material”,包含对财务不重要的因素,这个说法是不正确的。大多数分析师和投资者主要关注财务上重要的ESG因素,因为这些因素直接影响公司的风险和回报。虽然确定哪些ESG问题最重要需要判断,但这些判断通常基于财务影响的大小和可能性。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

Eden · 2024年10月22日

A是结论错误,还是就这道题而言更应该选C呢?因为在exclusionary investing strategy的情况下考虑的factor 就是not necessarily financially material. 另外所谓的standardized framework是指什么?

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 216

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021802000073问题如下When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to:A.inclu factors thare not financially material.B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments.C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. 请问知识点在哪里🤔呢

2024-10-20 20:46 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000073 问题如下 When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to: A.inclu factors thare not financially material. B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments. C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. 这题不是很理解,请说明下

2024-05-23 20:53 1 · 回答