开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

139****0989 · 2024年05月23日

为什么A会导致评级不同?

NO.PZ2024021802000070

问题如下:

Which of the following is least likely a reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from different providers is low?

选项:

A.The way ESG ratings are produced is evolving B.ESG factor identification is up to the rating providers C.ESG performance is not adequately reflected in stock prices

解释:

A. Incorrect because this is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from different providers is low. All main providers’ processes continue to evolve. This evolving process also makes historic comparisons difficult. The different methodologies might also mean like-for-like comparisons are not being made in the correlations between rating agencies (which means changes to ESG rating methodologies reduce correlations between ratings from different agencies).

B. Incorrect because the fact that ESG factors are identified by rating providers is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from different providers is low. ESG factor identification is up to the rating provider; therefore, dispersal of opinions starts even before consideration of different weighting and scoring methodologies.

C. Correct because the fact that ESG performance is not adequately reflected in stock prices is a potential consequence of low correlations between the ratings of different ESG rating providers; it is not a reason for these low correlations. ESG performance is less likely to be reflected in corporate stock and bond prices, as investors face a challenge when trying to identify outperformers and laggards. Even if a large fraction of investors has a preference for ESG performance, the divergence of the ratings disperses the effect of these preferences on asset prices.

为什么A会导致评级不同?逻辑上请解释说明下

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2024年05月23日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


为什么A选项会导致评级不同?

选项A:ESG评级方法在不断演变

  1. 评级方法不断变化:各评级机构不断改进和更新他们的评级方法,以适应新的市场需求和科学进展。
  2. 使用不同的方法:不同的评级机构可能在不同时间使用不同的方法和标准。
  3. 历史比较困难:因为方法不断变化,即使是同一个机构在不同时间给出的评级也可能不同。

综上,由于评级方法在不断演变,不同评级机构对同一家公司的ESG评级会有差异,因此A选项会导致评级不同。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 188

    浏览
相关问题

题干错误

2024-08-02 09:37 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000070 问题如下 Whiof the following is least likely a reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low? A.The wESG ratings are proceis evolving B.ESG factor intification is up to the rating provirs C.ESG performanis not aquately reflectein stoprices Incorrebecause this is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low. All main provirs’ processes continue to evolve. This evolving process also makes historic comparisons fficult. The fferent methologies might also melike-for-like comparisons are not being ma in the correlations between rating agencies (whimeans changes to ESG rating methologies recorrelations between ratings from fferent agencies).Incorrebecause the fathESG factors are intifierating provirs is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low. ESG factor intification is up to the rating provir; therefore, spersof opinions starts even before consiration of fferent weighting anscoring methologies.Correbecause the fathESG performanis not aquately reflectein stoprices is a potenticonsequenof low correlations between the ratings of fferent ESG rating provirs; it is not a reason for these low correlations. ESG performanis less likely to reflectein corporate stoanbonprices, investors faa challenge when trying to intify outperformers anlaggar. Even if a large fraction of investors ha preferenfor ESG performance, the vergenof the ratings sperses the effeof these preferences on asset prices. 不反应在股价上应该是后果才对,为什么这道题问原因也选C

2024-07-01 22:24 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000070问题如下 Whiof the following is least likely a reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low?A.The wESG ratings are proceis evolvingB.ESG factor intification is up to the rating provirsC.ESG performanis not aquately reflectein stoprices Incorrebecause this is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low. All main provirs’ processes continue to evolve. This evolving process also makes historic comparisons fficult. The fferent methologies might also melike-for-like comparisons are not being ma in the correlations between rating agencies (whimeans changes to ESG rating methologies recorrelations between ratings from fferent agencies).Incorrebecause the fathESG factors are intifierating provirs is one reason why the correlation between ESG ratings from fferent provirs is low. ESG factor intification is up to the rating provir; therefore, spersof opinions starts even before consiration of fferent weighting anscoring methologies.Correbecause the fathESG performanis not aquately reflectein stoprices is a potenticonsequenof low correlations between the ratings of fferent ESG rating provirs; it is not a reason for these low correlations. ESG performanis less likely to reflectein corporate stoanbonprices, investors faa challenge when trying to intify outperformers anlaggar. Even if a large fraction of investors ha preferenfor ESG performance, the vergenof the ratings sperses the effeof these preferences on asset prices. 請問為什麼C是對? 能詳細解釋一下嗎?

2024-04-08 13:24 1 · 回答