开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

139****0989 · 2024年05月23日

C如何更好的理解?

NO.PZ2024021801000080

问题如下:

The relatively low correlation of ESG ratings by the various providers most likely:

选项:

A.facilitates empirical research and decision making. B.motivates companies to improve their ESG performance. C.results in ESG performance not being fully reflected in corporate security prices.

解释:

A. Incorrect because the divergence of ratings poses a challenge for empirical research, as using one rater versus another may alter a study’s results and conclusions. Taken together, the ambiguity around ESG ratings represents a challenge for decision-makers.

B. Incorrect because the divergence hampers the ambition of companies to improve their ESG performance, because they receive mixed signals from rating agencies about which actions are expected and will be valued by the market.

C. Correct because ESG performance is less likely to be reflected in corporate stock and bond prices, as investors face a challenge when trying to identify outperformers and laggards. Investor tastes can influence asset prices, but only when a large enough fraction of the market holds and implements a uniform nonfinancial preference. Therefore, even if a large fraction of investors have a preference for ESG performance, the divergence of the ratings disperses the effect of these preferences on asset prices.

C如何更好的理解?请作进一步解释

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2024年05月23日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


选项 C 表示,由于不同 ESG 评级提供者之间的相关性较低,ESG 绩效不太可能完全反映在企业证券价格中。为了更好地理解这一点,可以从以下几个方面进行解释:

1. 低相关性导致的评级差异

不同的 ESG 评级提供者使用不同的方法和标准来评估企业的 ESG 绩效。这意味着同一家企业可能会从不同的评级机构获得不同的 ESG 评级。例如,一个机构可能认为某家公司在环境保护方面表现优异,而另一个机构则可能对该公司的社会责任表现给予更高的评价。这种差异导致了 ESG 评级的低相关性。

2. 对投资决策的影响

投资者在做出投资决策时,往往依赖于 ESG 评级来评估公司的可持续性表现。然而,当 ESG 评级提供者之间的相关性较低时,投资者可能会面临困难:

  • 难以比较和选择:由于同一公司可能会获得不同的 ESG 评级,投资者难以确定哪一个评级更具参考价值。
  • 不一致的投资策略:不同的投资者可能依赖不同的 ESG 评级提供者,导致他们在选择投资标的时存在不一致。这会使得市场上 ESG 投资策略的实施效果分散,难以形成一致的市场影响。

3. 市场价格反映的不完全性

由于 ESG 评级的低相关性和不一致,市场上的 ESG 投资者很难统一对某一家企业的 ESG 表现形成共识。这种情况下,即使有相当多的投资者偏好 ESG 投资,但由于评级分歧,他们对特定公司的投资行为也会有所不同,从而削弱了这些偏好对证券价格的集中影响力。

4. 证券价格的影响

  • 分散的影响力:当 ESG 评级分歧较大时,不同投资者的投资决策分散,导致 ESG 绩效难以一致地反映在证券价格中。
  • 市场信号不明确:企业从不同的评级机构获得混合信号,不确定应优先改善哪些方面的 ESG 表现。这导致公司难以采取一致且明确的改进措施,进一步影响其在市场上的表现。


----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 155

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021801000080 问题如下 The relatively low correlation of ESG ratings the various provirs most likely: A.facilitates empiricresearancision making. B.motivates companies to improve their ESG performance. C.results in ESG performannot being fully reflectein corporate security prices. Incorrebecause the vergenof ratings poses a challenge for empiricresearch, using one rater versus another malter a stu’s results anconclusions. Taken together, the ambiguity arounESG ratings represents a challenge for cision-makers.Incorrebecause the vergenhampers the ambition of companies to improve their ESG performance, because they receive mixesignals from rating agencies about whiactions are expecteanwill valuethe market.Correbecause ESG performanis less likely to reflectein corporate stoanbonprices, investors faa challenge when trying to intify outperformers anlaggar. Investor tastes cinfluenasset prices, but only when a large enough fraction of the market hol animplements a uniform nonfinancipreference. Therefore, even if a large fraction of investors have a preferenfor ESG performance, the vergenof the ratings sperses the effeof these preferences on asset prices. C是结果不是原因,这题是不是问的有问题

2024-06-28 12:20 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021801000080问题如下The relatively low correlation of ESG ratings the various provirs most likely:A.facilitates empiricresearancision making.B.motivates companies to improve their ESG performance.C.results in ESG performannot being fully reflectein corporate security prices. Incorrebecause the vergenof ratings poses a challenge for empiricresearch, using one rater versus another malter a stu’s results anconclusions. Taken together, the ambiguity arounESG ratings represents a challenge for cision-makers.Incorrebecause the vergenhampers the ambition of companies to improve their ESG performance, because they receive mixesignals from rating agencies about whiactions are expecteanwill valuethe market.Correbecause ESG performanis less likely to reflectein corporate stoanbonprices, investors faa challenge when trying to intify outperformers anlaggar. Investor tastes cinfluenasset prices, but only when a large enough fraction of the market hol animplements a uniform nonfinancipreference. Therefore, even if a large fraction of investors have a preferenfor ESG performance, the vergenof the ratings sperses the effeof these preferences on asset prices. 前边有一道题说c是结果,这里为什么又说是原因呢

2024-06-10 12:27 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021801000080问题如下 The relatively low correlation of ESG ratings the various provirs most likely:A.facilitates empiricresearancision making.B.motivates companies to improve their ESG performance.C.results in ESG performannot being fully reflectein corporate security prices. Incorrebecause the vergenof ratings poses a challenge for empiricresearch, using one rater versus another malter a stu’s results anconclusions. Taken together, the ambiguity arounESG ratings represents a challenge for cision-makers.Incorrebecause the vergenhampers the ambition of companies to improve their ESG performance, because they receive mixesignals from rating agencies about whiactions are expecteanwill valuethe market.Correbecause ESG performanis less likely to reflectein corporate stoanbonprices, investors faa challenge when trying to intify outperformers anlaggar. Investor tastes cinfluenasset prices, but only when a large enough fraction of the market hol animplements a uniform nonfinancipreference. Therefore, even if a large fraction of investors have a preferenfor ESG performance, the vergenof the ratings sperses the effeof these preferences on asset prices. Wecorrelation of ESG , 不是需要提供其esg 動力嗎?

2024-04-12 09:02 1 · 回答