开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

西红柿面 · 2024年05月09日

如果说不disclose可以吗?

NO.PZ2016040301000003

问题如下:

Jamison is a junior research analyst with Howard & Howard, a brokerage and investment banking firm. Howard & Howard’s mergers and acquisitions department has represented the Britland Company in all of its acquisitions for the past 20 years. Two of Howard & Howard’s senior officers are directors of various Britland subsidiaries. Jamison has been asked to write a research report on Britland. What is the best course of action for her to follow?

选项:

A.

Jamison may write the report but must refrain from expressing any opinions because of the special relationships between the two companies.

B.

Jamison should not write the report because the two Howard & Howard officers serve as directors for subsidiaries of Britland.

C.

Jamison may write the report if she discloses the special relationships with the company in the report.

解释:

C is correct.

This question involves Standard VI(A) –Disclosure of Conflicts. The question establishes a conflict of interest in which an analyst, Jamison, is asked to write a research report on a company that is a client of the analyst’s employer. In addition, two directors of the company are senior officers of Jamison’s employer. Both facts establish that there are conflicts of interest that must be disclosed by Jamison in her research report. Answer B is incorrect because an analyst is not prevented from writing a report simply because of the special relationship the analyst’s employer has with the company as long as that relationship is disclosed. Answer A is incorrect because whether or not Jamison expresses any opinions in the report is irrelevant to her duty to disclose a conflict of interest. Not expressing opinions does not relieve the analyst of the responsibility to disclose the special relationships between the two companies.

何老师说过,如果disclosure关系,可以随便表达观点;如果不disclosure,就是能描述Fact等等,或者加入到restrict list。那下面这个解析为啥说一定要disclosure呢?


Not expressing opinions does not relieve the analyst of the responsibility to disclose the special relationships between the two companies.

2 个答案
已采纳答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年05月10日

老师这个英文解释是跟在A选项的后面的哈,我想问的是,A里面假如我就表达实时数据而不做任何推荐的话,可以不Disclose。所以A为啥错了呢

即使Jamison在报告中仅提供实时数据而不做任何推荐,她仍然有责任披露存在的潜在利益冲突。根据职业道德准则,特别是与投资研究和分析报告相关的准则,分析师在发布研究报告时必须披露任何可能影响报告客观性的潜在利益冲突。这是为了保护投资者的利益,确保他们能够根据所有相关信息做出明智的投资决策。

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年05月09日

何老师的指导原则是正确的,并且与题目解析并不矛盾。让我们先解析一下何老师的观点:

  1. 如果披露了关系:在公开表达观点或推荐之前,如果你已经充分披露了可能存在的利益冲突或特殊关系,那么你可以相对自由地表达你的观点,因为投资者已经被告知并理解了这些观点可能存在的偏见。
  2. 如果不披露:在没有充分披露潜在利益冲突的情况下,最好只描述事实(Fact),避免给出可能受特殊关系影响的观点或推荐。或者,如果有明显的利益冲突,应将相关证券加入到限制列表(restrict list)以避免潜在的利益冲突。

现在,我们回到题目的解析。题目中的情况涉及到一个明显的利益冲突:Jamison所在的公司与Britland公司有多年的业务关系,并且Jamison的公司的两位高级官员还是Britland子公司的董事。这明显构成了一个需要披露的利益冲突。

解析中提到的“C is correct”指的是选项C:“Jamison可以写报告,如果她在报告中披露了与公司的特殊关系。”这一选项与何老师的第一个指导原则相符,即在披露了潜在利益冲突后,分析师可以表达观点。

解析中强调了“必须披露”的原因是为了确保投资者了解报告中的观点可能受到的利益关系影响,从而能够做出更明智的投资决策。这与何老师所说的“如果披露了关系,可以相对自由地表达观点”是一致的。

因此,题目解析与何老师的指导原则并不矛盾,都强调了在存在潜在利益冲突时披露的重要性。在披露了这些关系后,Jamison可以在报告中表达她的观点,同时投资者也会了解到这些观点可能受到的利益关系影响。