开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

周梅 · 2024年04月21日

道德

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202403070100000402

问题如下:

Given O’Connor’s first statement about the asset allocation, expected returns, and strategy of the Step Up Social Impact Private Equity Fund, does O’Connor most likely violate the CFA Institute Standards?

选项:

A.No B.Yes, with regard to Standard III(A): Loyalty, Prudence, and Care C.Yes, with regard to Standard V(B): Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients

解释:

Solution
  1. Correct because there is no indication O’Connor violated Standard III(A): Loyalty, Prudence, and Care or Standard V(B): Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients. With regard to Standard III(A), investors in this type of social impact fund are likely looking to achieve high levels of social impact as well as to obtain somewhat competitive investment returns. Consequently, returns may not be the primary focus so the Fund can still meet its fiduciary duty to clients. As long as this strategy is clearly indicated in the prospectus prior to entry into the Fund, O’Connor would not be in violation of Standard III(A). In addition, with regard to Standard V(B), since the investment strategy is clearly stated in detail in the prospectus and notifications of changes are sent to clients prior to changes being made, O’Connor, as part of the senior management team, would not be in violation of Standard V(B).

  2. Incorrect because there is no indication O’Connor violated Standard III(A): Loyalty, Prudence, and Care.

  3. Incorrect because there is no indication the information contained in the prospectus is incorrect or misleading. Therefore, O’Connor, as part of the senior management team, is not in violation of Standard V(B): Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients.

Guidance for Standards I–VII
  • demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the CFA Institute Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct by applying the Code and Standards to specific situations

为什么没有违反,85%

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年04月22日

在O'Connor的案例中,她没有违反CFA协会的标准,原因如下:

  1. 忠诚、谨慎和关心(Standard III(A)):社会影响力基金的投资者往往期望在获得一定竞争力的投资收益的同时,也能实现高度的社会影响。因此,在这种类型的基金中,投资回报可能不是主要关注点,而是实现其社会使命。只要这一策略在投资者加入基金之前就已经在招股说明书中明确说明,那么O'Connor就没有违反这一标准。她所描述的资产分配(85%投向教育和医疗保健)是符合基金的社会影响力目标的,这并没有显示出不忠诚、不谨慎或缺乏关心。
  2. 与客户和潜在客户的沟通(Standard V(B)):O'Connor明确表示,投资策略和选择投资的方法在基金招股说明书中有详细和清晰的描述,而且任何投资过程的改变都会在实施前通知投资者。这符合与客户和潜在客户沟通的标准,因为她确保了信息的透明度和及时性。

综上所述,尽管85%的资产分配给教育和医疗保健可能看起来是一个很高的比例,但这并不构成违反CFA协会标准的行为。关键在于这一策略是否已事先充分披露给投资者,并且是否符合投资者的期望和目标。在这个案例中,O'Connor的行为符合这些要求,因此她没有违反CFA协会的相关标准。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 182

    浏览
相关问题