开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Sieg · 2024年04月17日

分不清这个collective engagement 和 一致行动人的区别在哪里?

NO.PZ2022120703000054

问题如下:

A non-profit organization published a report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impact the valuation of a portfolio company. According to the Investor Forum, which of the following forms of engagement would be the most effective?

选项:

A.Discussing the report with the company during their annual review dialogue B.Writing a tailored letter to the company requesting additional details about their plastic footprint C.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to address the report

解释:

Compare to other two ways, collective engagement is the most effective way.

C is correct because a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement published by the Investor Forum i.e.

"SF1 – Objective(s) should be specific and targeted to enable clarity around delivery",

"SF2 – Objectives should be strategic or governance-led, or linked to material strategic and/or governance issues",

"SF3 – The engagement approach should be bespoke (tailored) to the target company",

"SF4 – The participants should have clear leadership with appropriate relationships, skills and knowledge",

"SF5 – The scale of coalition gathered (both scale of shareholding and overall AUM of group) should be meaningful",

"SF6 – The coalition should have a prior relationship and/or cultural awareness of the target company."

A is incorrect because the manager's engagement is an example of a "housekeeping engagement" which is an "annual dialogue to help maintain and enhance a relationship with a company, but with only limited objectives." Housekeeping engagement is somewhat likely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of "SF6: Depth of relationship" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.

B is incorrect because tailored letter-writing is somewhat likely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of "SF1: Clear Objective" and "SF2: Material and strategic" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.

联合其他投资人,一起做engagement不会被认为是一致行动人吗?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年04月18日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


理解“联合参与”(collective engagement)和“一致行动人”(acting in concert)之间的区别是投资者关系管理中的一个重要方面。这两者在策略和法律含义上有所不同,尤其是在企业治理和股东权利的背景下。

联合参与 (Collective Engagement)

联合参与指的是多个投资者共同参与对公司的影响或沟通活动,旨在通过团体的力量和资源优势来提升沟通的效果。在这种情况下,参与的投资者可能共同讨论并提出对公司政策或实践的建议,例如环保政策、公司治理结构或其他战略事项。

  • 优点:聚集更多资本的力量,可以给公司管理层带来更大的压力和动力来实施变更。
  • 目的:通常是为了共同解决具有广泛关注的问题,如环境影响、社会责任或治理改进。

一致行动人 (Acting in Concert)

一致行动人通常指的是几个投资者在没有公开披露的情况下,协同行动以达成某个共同的投资目标,如影响公司控制权或实现某种特定的交易结构。在很多司法管辖区,特别是在并购活动中,被视为一致行动人可能需要遵守额外的法律和规则,如披露义务和提出公开要约的责任。

  • 风险:一致行动人的行为可能触及到市场操纵、不透明的股权变动等法律风险。
  • 目的:通常与获取控制权、实现重大交易相关,可能涉及对公司治理结构的重大变动。

区别

  • 目的和策略:联合参与主要是为了推动公司在某些政策或实践上做出改进,而一致行动人则可能涉及企图改变公司的控制权或管理结构。
  • 法律含义:一致行动人可能需要遵守更严格的法律规定,如披露规则和公开要约义务,而联合参与则更多侧重于合作和对话,不涉及控制权问题。

这道题说的是多个投资者以联合参与的形式来讨论塑料足迹问题,并不一定意味着他们成为了一致行动人。只要参与过程中保持透明,并且不涉及试图控制公司的行为,这种联合参与通常被视为合理且有效的参与方式,有助于在不违反相关法律的前提下实现积极的公司变革。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 403

    浏览
相关问题

知识点对应错误 B也对,

2024-07-29 09:45 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000054问题如下 A non-profit organization publishea report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impathe valuation of a portfolio company. Accorng to the Investor Forum, whiof the following forms of engagement woulthe most effective? A.scussing the report with the company ring their annureview alogueB.Writing a tailoreletter to the company requesting aitiontails about their plastic footprintC.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to aress the report Compare to other two ways, collective engagement is the most effective way.C is correbecause a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement publishethe Investor Forum i.e. \"SF1 – Objective(s) shoulspecific antargeteto enable clarity arounlivery\", \"SF2 – Objectives shoulstrategic or governance-le or linketo materistrategic anor governanissues\", \"SF3 – The engagement approashoulbespoke (tailore to the target company\", \"SF4 – The participants shoulhave clelearship with appropriate relationships, skills anknowlee\", \"SF5 – The scale of coalition gathere(both scale of shareholng anoverall AUM of group) shoulmeaningful\", \"SF6 – The coalition shoulhave a prior relationship anor culturawareness of the target company.\"A is incorrebecause the manager's engagement is example of a \"housekeeping engagement\" whiis \"annualogue to help maintain anenhana relationship with a company, but with only limiteobjectives.\" Housekeeping engagement is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of \"SF6: pth of relationship\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.B is incorrebecause tailoreletter-writing is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of \"SF1: CleObjective\" an\"SF2: Materianstrategic\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement. 为什么不选b呀。。。。

2024-05-19 19:33 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000054问题如下 A non-profit organization publishea report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impathe valuation of a portfolio company. Accorng to the Investor Forum, whiof the following forms of engagement woulthe most effective? A.scussing the report with the company ring their annureview alogueB.Writing a tailoreletter to the company requesting aitiontails about their plastic footprintC.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to aress the report Compare to other two ways, collective engagement is the most effective way.C is correbecause a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement publishethe Investor Forum i.e. \"SF1 – Objective(s) shoulspecific antargeteto enable clarity arounlivery\", \"SF2 – Objectives shoulstrategic or governance-le or linketo materistrategic anor governanissues\", \"SF3 – The engagement approashoulbespoke (tailore to the target company\", \"SF4 – The participants shoulhave clelearship with appropriate relationships, skills anknowlee\", \"SF5 – The scale of coalition gathere(both scale of shareholng anoverall AUM of group) shoulmeaningful\", \"SF6 – The coalition shoulhave a prior relationship anor culturawareness of the target company.\"A is incorrebecause the manager's engagement is example of a \"housekeeping engagement\" whiis \"annualogue to help maintain anenhana relationship with a company, but with only limiteobjectives.\" Housekeeping engagement is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of \"SF6: pth of relationship\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.B is incorrebecause tailoreletter-writing is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of \"SF1: CleObjective\" an\"SF2: Materianstrategic\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement. 分不太清这两种,直接对话和集体

2024-04-16 15:21 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000054问题如下 A non-profit organization publishea report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impathe valuation of a portfolio company. Accorng to the Investor Forum, whiof the following forms of engagement woulthe most effective? A.scussing the report with the company ring their annureview alogueB.Writing a tailoreletter to the company requesting aitiontails about their plastic footprintC.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to aress the report Compare to other two ways, collective engagement is the most effective way.C is correbecause a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement publishethe Investor Forum i.e. \"SF1 – Objective(s) shoulspecific antargeteto enable clarity arounlivery\", \"SF2 – Objectives shoulstrategic or governance-le or linketo materistrategic anor governanissues\", \"SF3 – The engagement approashoulbespoke (tailore to the target company\", \"SF4 – The participants shoulhave clelearship with appropriate relationships, skills anknowlee\", \"SF5 – The scale of coalition gathere(both scale of shareholng anoverall AUM of group) shoulmeaningful\", \"SF6 – The coalition shoulhave a prior relationship anor culturawareness of the target company.\"A is incorrebecause the manager's engagement is example of a \"housekeeping engagement\" whiis \"annualogue to help maintain anenhana relationship with a company, but with only limiteobjectives.\" Housekeeping engagement is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of \"SF6: pth of relationship\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.B is incorrebecause tailoreletter-writing is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of \"SF1: CleObjective\" an\"SF2: Materianstrategic\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement. 如题。a,b为啥不行

2023-12-13 19:30 5 · 回答