开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Elai ne · 2024年04月16日

c为什么不对

NO.PZ2024010501000014

问题如下:

Double materiality is best described as:

选项:

A.

an extension of financial materiality that considers the impacts of a company on the climate or any other ESG factor.

B.

an accounting framework with three parts: social, environmental (or ecological), and financial (people, planet, and profit).

C.

investments made with the specific intent of generating positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return.

解释:

A is correct. Double materiality is an extension of the accounting concept of financial materiality. Double materiality considers the impacts of a company on the climate—or any other ESG factor. An accounting framework with three parts is known as the triple bottom line. Impact investing refers to investments made with the specific intent of generating positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return.

c为什么不对,看着也,没有太大错误呀

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2024年04月16日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


C选项描述的是影响力投资(Impact Investing),这是指出于希望在社会和环境上产生积极、可衡量影响的同时也获得财务回报的目的进行的投资。而双重实质性(Double Materiality)的概念超出了单纯的财务层面,它不仅包括企业对气候或其他ESG因素影响的考量,还包括这些因素对企业财务表现可能产生的影响。

换言之,双重实质性是财务实质性概念的扩展。它强调了企业活动对环境和社会的影响及环境和社会因素对企业自身经营结果的双向考量。因此,A选项正确,因为它准确描述了双重实质性包含对公司对气候或任何其他ESG因素的影响的考量。而C选项虽然也描述了ESG领域中的一个重要概念,但它专指的是一种投资策略,而不是描述双重实质性的定义。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 309

    浏览
相关问题