开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Helen Tam · 2024年04月08日

可以解釋一下這題目嗎?

NO.PZ2024021802000093

问题如下:

A steel-producing company reports higher carbon intensity compared to its peers. An analyst is most likely to:

选项:

A.increase the value of company's corporate debt.

B.increase the cost of debt for the company's new project financing.

C.assign a higher fair value price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio to the company.

解释:

A. Incorrect because high carbon intensity (proved by scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity being both absolute and relative to sector) leads to lower value of corporate debt.

B. Correct because high carbon intensity (proved by scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity being both absolute and relative to sector) leads to increased cost of debt for new project financing.

C. Incorrect because weak ESG performance leads to lowering the price-to-earnings ratio compared to peers. For example, an investor might assign a “fair value P/E” of 16x to a strong ESG company versus 14x for an average ESG company and 12x for a weak ESG company.

不明白為什麼C是錯誤?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王岑 · 2024年04月08日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


选项C错误的原因在于它提出了给予高碳强度公司更高的公平价值市盈率(P/E)比例,但高碳强度通常会被视为较弱的ESG表现。相对于ESG表现较好的同行,ESG表现较差的公司通常会面临更大的风险和成本,这可能影响其收益潜力和估值。正确的说法是,分析师会给予高碳强度公司较低的市盈率,而不是更高的市盈率。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!