NO.PZ2022062601000018
问题如下:
Finance students John and Jesse discuss Multi-Manager Strategies, discussing the differences between multi-strategy and fund-of-funds approaches. Jesse said that multi-strategy funds are generally better than fund-of-funds. She gave the following reasons:
• lower levels of variance,
• lower levels of leverage,
• improved fee structure,
• increased transparency,
• faster reaction time, and
• a more diverse mix of investment strategies.
Jessie's comment is likely accurate:
选项:
A.
variance and leverage.
B.
fee structure and transparency.
C.
reaction time and diversification.
解释:
B is correct. Multi-strategy funds typically have more favorable fee structures for investors than funds of funds and also offer increased transparency.
A is incorrect. Multi-strategy funds typically use more leverage and have more unstable returns than FOFs.
C is incorrect. Although multi-strategy funds have faster reaction times for tactical allocation changes, funds of funds potentially offer a more diverse mix of strategies.
知识点考察:Multi-Manager Strategies
B 是正确的。Multi-strategy funds通常比FOFs对投资者有更有利的费用结构,并且还提供更高的透明度。
A 不正确。Multi-strategy funds通常比基金中的基金使用更多的杠杆。
C 不正确。尽管Multi-strategy funds对reaction time更快,但FOFs更diversification。
请问C选项中,为什么FOF比multi更diversify?感觉两个应该是同等diversify?