开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

世纪之龙5 · 2024年03月19日

b为什么是对的,不是很明白四个选项

NO.PZ2019042401000053

问题如下:

A consultant is analyzing the disclosures hedge funds are mandated to file with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The consultant emphasizes how investors can utilize these disclosures to identify and manage fraud risk. Which of the following statements is correct?

选项:

A.

Disclosures of past regulatory or legal violations are not reliable indicators of fraud risk due to the evolving nature of circumstances.

B.

There is not enough evidence to conclude that investors of hedge funds are compensated for fraud risk by receiving higher returns.

C.

Regulatory and legal prohibitions effectively prevent fraud, and inadequate disclosure requirements on violations contribute to fraudulent activities.

D.

Disclosures of regulatory and legal violations primarily benefit investors with access to expensive real-time data, excluding a significant portion of investors.

解释:

B is correct. There’s no evidence that supports that investors are compensated for fraud risk through higher returns or lower fees. A is incorrect. Disclosures regarding past regulatory or legal violations are effective in predicting fraud. C is incorrect. Although certain characteristics, such as conflicts of interest, can predict fraud, we cannot infer that conflicts of interest cause fraud, or that their prohibition would deter fraud. D is incorrect. In the past, SEC didn’t provide access to historical data (contemporaneous data has always been available) but this is not the case anymore. Up until 2007, the investing public’s ability to develop and use predictive models based on Form ADV data was potentially limited because the SEC did not provide access to historical data. As a result, the realized benefits of disclosure during that time frame may have been lower. The results of the study given in the reading suggest that improving public access to comprehensive historical disclosures could increase the benefits these disclosures were meant to provide.

如题

1 个答案

pzqa27 · 2024年03月20日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


B是对应讲义这里,投资者不可以因为有欺诈风向获取更高的收益

A说由于情况不断变化,披露过去违反监管或法律的情况并不是欺诈风险的可靠指标。这个是不对的,对过去违法行为的披露可以对未来欺诈进行有效预测的。

C说监管和法律禁令能有效防止欺诈,而对违规行为的披露要求不充分助长了欺诈活动。这个是不对的,主要是错在因果关系了,虽然披露违规行为可以预测未来欺诈,但是披露不披露违规行为不是导致欺诈的原因。

D说的是披露违反监管和法律的行为主要有利于能够获得昂贵的实时数据的投资者,而排除了很大一部分投资者。这个是不对的,披露违规行为恰好是利好那些没什么时间调查研究的投资者。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 184

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019042401000053 问题如下 A consultant is analyzing the sclosures hee fun are manteto file with the US Securities anExchange Commission. The consultant emphasizes how investors cutilize these sclosures to intify anmanage fraurisk. Whiof the following statements is correct? A.sclosures of past regulatory or legviolations are not reliable incators of fraurisk e to the evolving nature of circumstances. B.There is not enough evinto conclu thinvestors of hee fun arecompensatefor fraurisk receiving higher returns. C.Regulatory anlegprohibitions effectively prevent frau aninaquate sclosure requirements on violations contribute to fraulent activities. sclosures of regulatory anlegviolations primarily benefit investors with access to expensive real-time texclung a significant portion of investors. B is correct. There’s no evinthsupports thinvestors are compensateforfraurisk through higher returns or lower fees.A is incorrect. sclosures regarng past regulatory or legviolations are effectivein precting frauC is incorrect. Although certain characteristics, suconflicts of interest, canprefrau we cannot infer thconflicts of interest cause frau or ththeirprohibition woulter frauis incorrect. In the past, SEC ’t provi access to historicta(contemporaneous ta halways been available) but this is not the caseanymore. Up until 2007, the investing public’s ability to velop anuse prectivemols baseon Form A ta wpotentially limitebecause the SEC notprovi access to historicta result, the realizebenefits of sclosurering thtime frame mhave been lower. The results of the stu given in thereang suggest thimproving public access to comprehensive historicalsclosures coulincrease the benefits these sclosures were meant to provi. B这句话翻译过来就是“没有充分的证据可以推测出投资者因为程度欺诈风险而获得高昂的回报”,这句话在说什么?为什么是对的?答非所问啊

2024-10-20 10:56 1 · 回答