Cephas · 2024年02月04日
NO.PZ2022072902000013
问题如下：
What ESG feature is often overlooked in screening approaches for collective investment funds?
选项：
A.Negative screening approaches like 'socially conscious'.
B.Position-weighted ESG portfolio score.
C.Portfolio carbon exposure.
D.Stewardship.
解释：
量化措施没有考虑更软的ESG形式，例如尽责管理和参与活动。
什么是collective investment funds 这里是为什么要独立这个funds出来，以区别其他funds呢？而且这节标题是Listed/unlisted companies and collective investment funds，也没看到跟这章前面的区别在哪？
NO.PZ2022072902000013问题如下 WhESG feature is often overlookein screening approaches for collective investment fun? A.Negative screening approaches like 'socially conscious'.B.Position-weighteESG portfolio score.C.Portfolio carbon exposure.Stewarhip. 量化措施没有考虑更软的ESG形式，例如尽责管理和参与活动。 B什么意思，以及为什么不选B
NO.PZ2022072902000013 问题如下 WhESG feature is often overlookein screening approaches for collective investment fun? A.Negative screening approaches like 'socially conscious'. B.Position-weighteESG portfolio score. C.Portfolio carbon exposure. Stewarhip. 量化措施没有考虑更软的ESG形式，例如尽责管理和参与活动。 collective investment fun就默认是量化的方法吗？
NO.PZ2022072902000013问题如下 WhESG feature is often overlookein screening approaches for collective investment fun? A.Negative screening approaches like 'socially conscious'.B.Position-weighteESG portfolio score.C.Portfolio carbon exposure.Stewarhip. 量化措施没有考虑更软的ESG形式，例如尽责管理和参与活动。 感觉没有理解到题目的意思呢
NO.PZ2022072902000013 问题如下 WhESG feature is often overlookein screening approaches for collective investment fun? A.Negative screening approaches like 'socially conscious'. B.Position-weighteESG portfolio score. C.Portfolio carbon exposure. Stewarhip. 量化措施没有考虑更软的ESG形式，例如尽责管理和参与活动。 老师，能麻烦一下其他三个错误为什么错或者应该用在哪里吗
