开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Arnie · 2024年01月29日

这句话是什么意思呢?

NO.PZ2022062601000013

问题如下:

High net worth client John told his investment advisor Bourne that he wants to shift a portion of his portfolio assets into alternative investments, Bourne said, As we move toward an increased allocation to alternative investments (especially private assets) We may wish to shift from traditional asset allocation approach to a risk-factor-based approach. The advantage of traditional methods is that they are easier to communicate compared to risk-factor-based approaches. However, traditional approaches often commingle assets with very different risk characteristics in the same asset classes, resulting in investment portfolios having the same asset allocation but very different risks. Unlike traditional approach, systematic risk factors do equally well at explaining the risk and return patterns of public and private assets.

Which aspect of Bourne’s statement of the traditional approach to asset allocation versus a risk-factor-based approach is least likely correct?

选项:

A.

Commingling of assets into asset classes

B.

Explaining the risk and returns of various assets

C.

The relative ease of communicating the two approaches

解释:

B is correct. Bourne is incorrect about the ability of risk-factor approaches to explain both public and private asset behavior. The system risk factor approach can usually explain most or all of the risk and return patterns of public assets, but these patterns are much less common for private assets. This is due to the widespread use of appraisal-based valuation for private assets, as well as the idiosyncratic risks inherent in individual funds.

A is incorrect. Bourne is correct, as traditional approaches typically commingle assets with very different risk characteristics into the same broad asset class - for example, when high-yield fixed income securities and government bonds are both included in the fixed income allocation.

C is incorrect. Bourne is correct, explaining traditional approaches to asset allocation is easier than explaining risk-based approaches.

知识点考察:Risk-Based Approaches to Asset Classification

B是正确的。Bourne关于风险因素方法解释公共和私人资产行为的能力是不正确的。系统风险因素方法通常可以解释公共资产的大部分或全部风险和回报模式,但私人资产的这些模式要少得多。这是由于私人资产普遍使用基于评估的估值,以及个别基金存在的特殊风险。

A不正确。Bourne是正确的,传统方法通常将具有非常不同风险特征的资产混合到相同的广泛资产类别中——例如,当高收益固定收益证券和政府债券都包含在投资组合的固定收益分配中时。

C不正确。Bourne是正确的,解释传统的资产配置方法比解释基于风险的方法更容易。

因为广泛、被动的传统公共资产类别的行为能够由系统性风险因素完全或几乎完全解释。而在另类资产类别中,应该有相对较大的部分无法解释的风险。这是源于私募股权基金的appraisal-based valuation和异质风险或主动管理导致的对冲基金的异质风险等问题。 (对冲基金策略产生的回报应该主要由 alpha 而不是系统性风险因素驱动。)所以B选项是错的。

下图截取自原版书。


文中: However, traditional approaches often commingle assets with very different risk characteristics in the same asset classes, resulting in investment portfolios having the same asset allocation but very different risks.  这句话啥意思呢?


traditional approach 不就是overestimate the diversification,因为资产都是受相同的风险因子影响吗? 为啥这里由说到了不同的风险特征among the same asset class?

1 个答案

伯恩_品职助教 · 2024年01月29日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


文中: However, traditional approaches often commingle assets with very different risk characteristics in the same asset classes, resulting in investment portfolios having the same asset allocation but very different risks. 这句话啥意思呢?——然而,传统方法往往将具有非常不同风险特征的资产混合在同一资产类别中,导致投资组合具有相同的资产配置,但风险非常不同。

traditional approach 不就是overestimate the diversification,因为资产都是受相同的风险因子影响吗? ——是的

为啥这里由说到了不同的风险特征among the same asset class?——打个比方垃圾债和股票是两种不同的资产,但是走势是很像的。达不到分散化的效果。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 209

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022062601000013 问题如下 High net worth client John tolhis investment aisor Bourne thhe wants to shift a portion of his portfolio assets into alternative investments, Bourne sai we move towarincreaseallocation to alternative investments (especially private assets) We mwish to shift from trationasset allocation approato a risk-factor-baseapproach. The aantage of trationmetho is ththey are easier to communicate compareto risk-factor-baseapproaches. However, trationapproaches often commingle assets with very fferent risk characteristiin the same asset classes, resulting in investment portfolios having the same asset allocation but very fferent risks. Unlike trationapproach, systematic risk factors equally well explaining the risk anreturn patterns of public anprivate assets.Whiaspeof Bourne’s statement of the trationapproato asset allocation versus a risk-factor-baseapproais least likely correct? A.Commingling of assets into asset classes B.Explaining the risk anreturns of various assets C.The relative ease of communicating the two approaches B is correct. Bourne is incorreabout the ability of risk-factor approaches to explain both public anprivate asset behavior. The system risk factor approacusually explain most or all of the risk anreturn patterns of public assets, but these patterns are muless common for private assets. This is e to the wispreuse of appraisal-basevaluation for private assets, well the iosyncratic risks inherent in invifun.A is incorrect. Bourne is correct, trationapproaches typically commingle assets with very fferent risk characteristiinto the same broasset class - for example, when high-yielfixeincome securities angovernment bon are both incluin the fixeincome allocation.C is incorrect. Bourne is correct, explaining trationapproaches to asset allocation is easier thexplaining risk-baseapproaches.知识点考察Risk-BaseApproaches to Asset ClassificationB是正确的。Bourne关于风险因素方法公共和私人资产行为的能力是不正确的。系统风险因素方法通常可以公共资产的大部分或全部风险和回报模式,但私人资产的这些模式要少得多。这是由于私人资产普遍使用基于评估的估值,以及个别基金存在的特殊风险。A不正确。Bourne是正确的,传统方法通常将具有非常不同风险特征的资产混合到相同的广泛资产类别中——例如,当高收益固定收益证券和政府债券都包含在投资组合的固定收益分配中时。C不正确。Bourne是正确的,传统的资产配置方法比基于风险的方法更容易。 因为广泛、被动的传统公共资产类别的行为能够由系统性风险因素完全或几乎完全。而在另类资产类别中,应该有相对较大的部分无法的风险。这是源于私募股权基金的appraisal-basevaluation和异质风险或主动管理导致的对冲基金的异质风险等问题。(对冲基金策略产生的回报应该主要由alpha 而不是系统性风险因素驱动。)所以B是错的。下图截取自原版书。 为什么B 不正确,没看懂,是针对题目中哪句话不对呢。

2024-06-21 17:14 1 · 回答