开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

pseudonym · 2024年01月18日

accounts for covariance是指什么?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202207040100001001

问题如下:

In Exhibit 1, the replication manager that most likely blends stratified sampling and optimization is:

选项:

A.Manager A. B.Manager B. C.Manager C.

解释:

Solution

C is correct. Manager C demonstrates characteristics consistent with a blended approach of stratified sampling and optimization. The optimization process accounts explicitly for the covariances in the portfolio constituents and results in lowering tracking error when compared with stratified sampling alone. Using 1,200 holdings out of the 3,000 used by the index illustrates stratified sampling. Manager A appears to use a full replication, given the large number of holdings (498 of 500) and the low tracking error. Manager B appears to use stratified sampling alone, given the proportion of holdings (800 out of 928 in the index, or 86%), and does not appear to use optimization, given the large tracking error, which would have been reduced by accounting for covariances.

A is incorrect. It is very likely that Manager A uses a full replication approach as indicated by the number of holdings (498 of 500) and the low tracking error.

B is incorrect. Manager B uses stratified sampling alone. The manager has not reduced tracking error by accounting for covariances as would be done when using optimization. Using 1,200 holdings out of the 3,000 used by the index illustrates stratified sampling.

答案里的解释也提到了,这里的covariance是指什么?

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年01月19日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


答案里的解释也提到了,这里的covariance是指什么?

Hello,亲爱的同学~

这里的covariance是指协方差。

协方差是一个重要的统计量,可以用于描述两个变量之间的线性关系。

它衡量了两个变量在方向和幅度上的一致性。

协方差越大,表示两个变量的变化方向越一致。

正值表示两个变量呈正相关,负值表示两个变量呈负相关,0表示两个变量不相关。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 170

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202207040100001001问题如下In Exhibit 1, the replication manager thmost likely blen stratifiesampling anoptimization is:A.Manager A.B.Manager B.C.Manager C.SolutionC is correct. Manager C monstrates characteristiconsistent with a blenapproaof stratifiesampling anoptimization. The optimization process accounts explicitly for the covariances in the portfolio constituents anresults in lowering tracking error when comparewith stratifiesampling alone. Using 1,200 holngs out of the 3,000 usethe inx illustrates stratifiesampling. Manager A appears to use a full replication, given the large number of holngs (498 of 500) anthe low tracking error. Manager B appears to use stratifiesampling alone, given the proportion of holngs (800 out of 928 in the inx, or 86%), anes not appeto use optimization, given the large tracking error, whiwoulhave been receaccounting for covariances.A is incorrect. It is very likely thManager A uses a full replication approaincatethe number of holngs (498 of 500) anthe low tracking error. B is incorrect. Manager B uses stratifiesampling alone. The manager hnot recetracking error accounting for covariances woulne when using optimization. Using 1,200 holngs out of the 3,000 usethe inx illustrates stratifiesampling.没选c是因为持股1200,而benchmark有3000只,感觉差距太大了。所以正常stratifiesampling持股本身就会和benchmark差这么多么?其次是之前有同学问过covariance是什么意思,知道是协方差,只是在在这个题中代表什么含义,用处是什么?

2024-06-25 14:50 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202207040100001001 问题如下 In Exhibit 1, the replication manager thmost likely blen stratifiesampling anoptimization is: A.Manager B.Manager C.Manager SolutionC is correct. Manager C monstrates characteristiconsistent with a blenapproaof stratifiesampling anoptimization. The optimization process accounts explicitly for the covariances in the portfolio constituents anresults in lowering tracking error when comparewith stratifiesampling alone. Using 1,200 holngs out of the 3,000 usethe inx illustrates stratifiesampling. Manager A appears to use a full replication, given the large number of holngs (498 of 500) anthe low tracking error. Manager B appears to use stratifiesampling alone, given the proportion of holngs (800 out of 928 in the inx, or 86%), anes not appeto use optimization, given the large tracking error, whiwoulhave been receaccounting for covariances.A is incorrect. It is very likely thManager A uses a full replication approaincatethe number of holngs (498 of 500) anthe low tracking error. B is incorrect. Manager B uses stratifiesampling alone. The manager hnot recetracking error accounting for covariances woulne when using optimization. Using 1,200 holngs out of the 3,000 usethe inx illustrates stratifiesampling. 遇到这种题应该怎么判断哪个portfolio用哪种方法呢?

2024-02-09 17:49 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202207040100001001 问题如下 In Exhibit 1, the replication manager thmost likely blen stratifiesampling anoptimization is: A.Manager B.Manager C.Manager SolutionC is correct. Manager C monstrates characteristiconsistent with a blenapproaof stratifiesampling anoptimization. The optimization process accounts explicitly for the covariances in the portfolio constituents anresults in lowering tracking error when comparewith stratifiesampling alone. Using 1,200 holngs out of the 3,000 usethe inx illustrates stratifiesampling. Manager A appears to use a full replication, given the large number of holngs (498 of 500) anthe low tracking error. Manager B appears to use stratifiesampling alone, given the proportion of holngs (800 out of 928 in the inx, or 86%), anes not appeto use optimization, given the large tracking error, whiwoulhave been receaccounting for covariances.A is incorrect. It is very likely thManager A uses a full replication approaincatethe number of holngs (498 of 500) anthe low tracking error. B is incorrect. Manager B uses stratifiesampling alone. The manager hnot recetracking error accounting for covariances woulne when using optimization. Using 1,200 holngs out of the 3,000 usethe inx illustrates stratifiesampling. usage of futures 是noaccounts for covariances 是yes就选c了

2024-01-18 17:00 1 · 回答