问题如下图:
选项:
A.
B.
C.
解释:
我这里有点搞晕了,计算V0的时候为什么不是NPV即143.65-100=43.65呢?
NO.PZ201601200500000705 17.76 in Ye1 an24.89 in Ye2. 24.89 in Ye1 an17.76 in Ye2. A is correct. Economic income is the cash flow plus the change in value, or economic income is the cash flow minus the economic preciation (we will use the seconexpression): lV0=851.12+851.122=143.65V1=851.12=75.89V2=0{l}V_0=\frac{85}{1.12}+\frac{85}{1.12^2}=143.65\\V_1=\frac{85}{1.12}=75.89\\V_2=0lV0=1.1285+1.12285=143.65V1=1.1285=75.89V2=0 Economic income (Ye1) = CF1−(V0−V1)CF_1-(V_0-V_1)CF1−(V0−V1) = 85 – (143.65 – 75.89) = 85 – 67.76 = €17.24 Economic income (Ye2) = CF2−(V1−V2)CF_2-(V_1-V_2)CF2−(V1−V2) = 85 – (75.89 – 0) = 85 – 75.89 = €9.11如题,EI的原本公式变形之后应该是PV0*re,本题可以这么做吗
NO.PZ201601200500000705 请问老师, 当题目给出的re ≠ WACC时,求EI我们应该用WACC吧? 也就是,EI1 = V0*WAC谢谢!
请问解析中85是怎么算的?
EI的公式不应该是V*re吗
请问答案中计算流程中的v2为何等于0