一旦做了hedge,为什么风险敞口就没那么大了?在风险因子这块为什么就没法做diversification ?
补充进alternative investment 就不会降低diversification了?
Diversification offered by
alternative assets may allow for greater hedging of climate risk;怎么理解这句话?
如果把组合中高污染碳密集类型产品剔除去,会减少diversification ,但是加入alternative 产品就可以补充diversification,那么alternative 产品就没有高污染碳密集型产品吗?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/600b4/600b4e03732abd444f93e319ec4344fd69d8063d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bd4f/3bd4fc683a6f8778580df45dda2079e7bfcc5dd4" alt=""
因子暴露,风险敞口,权重配比,资产配置之间怎么联系起来的?
第8章 第一节和第二节,在战略资产配置模型中整合ESG和在投资组合构建管理中引入ESG,这两者不是一样的吗,战略资产配置不就是等于在做投资组合构建吗?
Top-down analytics and underlying ESG analysis 怎么结合来全面了解ESG风险和敞口呢?
怎么理解ESG exposure and risk(ESG风险和敞口)?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10b17/10b17bf31024cae3478b313b21059f0323f00da9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40948/409487493c83ed11a5deaee808af43fe02fc5ce9" alt=""