NO.PZ2023122201000118
问题如下:
An analyst gathers the following information (in $ millions) about a private equity fund:
The manager's incentive fee is 20% of the profits. If no clawback provision applies, the total incentive fee (in $ millions) under an American-style waterfall is:
选项:
A.–4
0
C.6
解释:
C is
correct. It calculated the incentive fee based on the Investment B's
profit of $30 million under an American-style
deal-by-deal waterfall, and correctly excluded Investment A which
incurred a loss. Total incentive fee payable = Incentive fee of Investment
B = $30 million × 20% = $6 million.
A is incorrect
because it calculated the incentive fee based on the total
loss of –$20 million. Note that under a European-style whole-of-fund
waterfall, while the incentive fee is calculated on the total profit/loss of
the fund, the minimum incentive fee would be $0 instead of –$20
million × 20% = –$4 million.
B is incorrect
because it calculated the incentive fee based on the total
loss of –$20 million under a European-style whole-of-fund
waterfall instead of an American-style deal-by-deal waterfall.
Consequently, total incentive fee payable = MAX [$0,
–$4 million] = $0. Note that while the incentive fee is calculated on the
total profit/loss of the fund, the minimum incentive fee is $0 instead
of –$20 million × 20% = –$4 million.
美式 还是欧式 只是说是否最后计算,但这个只投资了一年,计算结果应该一样吧?
为什么美式排除A