开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

mino酱是个小破货 · 2024年01月01日

可是老师表2上方有说明是用Micro,为什么您说是Macro的呢?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201909300100000307

问题如下:

7 Based on Exhibit 2, the underperformance at the overall fund level is predominantly the result of poor security selection decisions in:

选项:

A.

South America.

B.

greater Europe.

C.

developed Asia and Australasia.

解释:

A is correct.

The total –441 bps of underperformance from security selection and interaction at the overall fund level is predominantly the result of poor South American security selection decisions (–311 bps = 3.11%).

Allocation = (wi – Wi)(Bi – B)
North America = (10.84% – 7.67%)(16.47% – 22.67%) = –0.20%
Greater Europe = (38.92% – 42.35%)(25.43% – 22.67%) = –0.09%
Developed Asia and Australasia = (29.86% – 31.16%)(12.85% – 22.67%) = 0.13%
South America = (20.38% – 18.82%)(35.26% – 22.67%) = 0.20%

Selection + Interaction = Wi(Ri – Bi) + (wi – Wi)(Ri – Bi)

North America = 7.67%(16.50% – 16.47%) + (10.84% – 7.67%)(16.50% – 16.47%) = 0.00%

Greater Europe = 42.35%(23.16% – 25.43%) + (38.92% – 42.35%)(23.16% – 25.43%) = –0.88%
Developed Asia and Australasia = 31.16%(11.33% – 12.85%) + (29.86% – 31.16%)(11.33% – 12.85%) = –0.45%
South America = 18.82%(20.00% – 35.26%) + (20.38% – 18.82%)(20.00% – 35.26%) = –3.11%

可是老师表2上方有说明是用Micro的 “constructing a region-based micro attribution analysis to evaluate the active decisions of the portfolio manager. ” 为什么您说是Macro的呢?怎么识别呢?如若是Micro的是不是只求S的公式就可以,不用加上I?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年01月02日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


Hello,亲爱的同学~

这其实是原版书的一个bug。

应对考试,只要记住,题干让我们求S我们就求S,题干让我们S+I,我们再算S+I即可。考试的时候不会confuse我们。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 339

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201909300100000307 问题如下 7 Baseon Exhibit 2, the unrperformanthe overall funlevel is preminantly the result of poor security selection cisions in: A.South Americ B.greater Europe. C.velopeAsia anAustralasi A is correct. The tot–441 bps of unrperformanfrom security selection aninteraction the overall funlevel is preminantly the result of poor South Americsecurity selection cisions (–311 bps = 3.11%).Allocation = (wi – Wi)(– B)North Ameri= (10.84% – 7.67%)(16.47% – 22.67%) = –0.20%Greater Europe = (38.92% – 42.35%)(25.43% – 22.67%) = –0.09%velopeAsia anAustralasia = (29.86% – 31.16%)(12.85% – 22.67%) = 0.13%South Ameri= (20.38% – 18.82%)(35.26% – 22.67%) = 0.20%Selection + Interaction = Wi(Ri – Bi) + (wi – Wi)(Ri – Bi) North Ameri= 7.67%(16.50% – 16.47%) + (10.84% – 7.67%)(16.50% – 16.47%) = 0.00%Greater Europe = 42.35%(23.16% – 25.43%) + (38.92% – 42.35%)(23.16% – 25.43%) = –0.88%velopeAsia anAustralasia = 31.16%(11.33% – 12.85%) + (29.86% – 31.16%)(11.33% – 12.85%) = –0.45%South Ameri= 18.82%(20.00% – 35.26%) + (20.38% – 18.82%)(20.00% – 35.26%) = –3.11% 题意翻译到底哪个板块的equity selection不好导致最终结果表现很差,那不应该是选selection部分负的最大的那一个板块吗?为什么选了唯一一个selection板块是正回报的?

2024-11-08 11:22 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201909300100000307 问题如下 7 Baseon Exhibit 2, the unrperformanthe overall funlevel is preminantly the result of poor security selection cisions in: A.South Americ B.greater Europe. C.velopeAsia anAustralasi A is correct. The tot–441 bps of unrperformanfrom security selection aninteraction the overall funlevel is preminantly the result of poor South Americsecurity selection cisions (–311 bps = 3.11%).Allocation = (wi – Wi)(– B)North Ameri= (10.84% – 7.67%)(16.47% – 22.67%) = –0.20%Greater Europe = (38.92% – 42.35%)(25.43% – 22.67%) = –0.09%velopeAsia anAustralasia = (29.86% – 31.16%)(12.85% – 22.67%) = 0.13%South Ameri= (20.38% – 18.82%)(35.26% – 22.67%) = 0.20%Selection + Interaction = Wi(Ri – Bi) + (wi – Wi)(Ri – Bi) North Ameri= 7.67%(16.50% – 16.47%) + (10.84% – 7.67%)(16.50% – 16.47%) = 0.00%Greater Europe = 42.35%(23.16% – 25.43%) + (38.92% – 42.35%)(23.16% – 25.43%) = –0.88%velopeAsia anAustralasia = 31.16%(11.33% – 12.85%) + (29.86% – 31.16%)(11.33% – 12.85%) = –0.45%South Ameri= 18.82%(20.00% – 35.26%) + (20.38% – 18.82%)(20.00% – 35.26%) = –3.11% 老师好,这道题不是让求security selection吗?但是我看答案算的是interaction的影响啊?是我什么地方理解错了吗?

2024-05-28 20:40 1 · 回答

不好意思请问根据Brinson公式,不是allocation是weight的差别,selection是return的差别吗?这道题问selection是不是要用return的差别乘以benchmark 的weight来算?

2020-10-30 12:07 2 · 回答