开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

秋樣 · 2023年12月26日

Asset allocation-论述题-为何组合不合适

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201805280100000401

问题如下:

Discuss two reasons why the proposed asset allocation is inappropriate for Titan.

选项:

解释:

The proposed asset allocation for Titan is not appropriate because:

1 Given the shift in enrollment trends and declining donations resulting from the sanctions, Titan will likely need greater liquidity in the future because of the increased probability of higher outflows to support university operations. The proposed asset allocation shifts Titan’s allocation into risky assets (increases the relative equity holdings and decreases the relative bond holdings), which would introduce greater uncertainty as to their future value.

2 Titan is relatively small for the proposed addition of private equity. Access to such an asset class as private equity may be constrained for smaller asset owners, such as Titan, who may lack the related internal investment expertise. Additionally, the Sun-Fin Private Equity Fund minimum investment level is $1 million. This level of investment in private equity would be 10% of Titan’s total portfolio value. Given Titan’s declining financial position due to declining enrollments and its resulting potential need for liquidity, private equity at this minimum level of investment is not appropriate for Titan.

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

Mark DuBord, a financial adviser, works with two university foundations, the Titan State Foundation (Titan) and the Fordhart University Foundation (Fordhart). He meets with each university foundation investment committee annually to review fund objectives and constraints.

Titan’s portfolio has a market value of $10 million. After his annual meeting with its investment committee, DuBord notes the following points:

■ Titan must spend 3% of its beginning-of-the-year asset value annually to meet legal obligations.

■ The investment committee seeks exposure to private equity investments and requests DuBord’s review of the Sun-Fin Private Equity Fund as a potential new investment.

■ A recent declining trend in enrollment is expected to continue. This is a concern because it has led to a loss of operating revenue from tuition.

■ Regulatory sanctions and penalties are likely to result in lower donations over the next five years.

DuBord supervises two junior analysts and instructs one to formulate new allocations for Titan. This analyst proposes the allocation presented in Exhibit 1.


Discuss two reasons why the proposed asset allocation is inappropriate for Titan.


解释:

The proposed asset allocation for Titan is not appropriate because:

1 Given the shift in enrollment trends and declining donations resulting from the sanctions, Titan will likely need greater liquidity in the future because of the increased probability of higher outflows to support university operations. The proposed asset allocation shifts Titan’s allocation into risky assets (increases the relative equity holdings and decreases the relative bond holdings), which would introduce greater uncertainty as to their future value.

2 Titan is relatively small for the proposed addition of private equity. Access to such an asset class as private equity may be constrained for smaller asset owners, such as Titan, who may lack the related internal investment expertise. Additionally, the Sun-Fin Private Equity Fund minimum investment level is $1 million. This level of investment in private equity would be 10% of Titan’s total portfolio value. Given Titan’s declining financial position due to declining enrollments and its resulting potential need for liquidity, private equity at this minimum level of investment is not appropriate for Titan.



我的回答,求批改:


  1. The tuition and donations to the foundation will decline in the next few years, therefore the risk tolerance should decline as well. More capital in private equity transferred from Bond fund will make the portfolio less liquid. 
  2. Since donations and tuition fees will decline, university may need more support from the foundation to deal with operating issues, therefore the 3% cash equivalent funds are less than expected. 




2 个答案
已采纳答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2023年12月26日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


我的回答,求批改:


  1. The tuition and donations to the foundation will decline in the next few years, therefore the risk tolerance should decline as well. More capital in private equity transferred from Bond fund will make the portfolio less liquid. 


建议改成这样,Titan will need greater liquidity in the future because The tuition and donations to the foundation will decline in the next few years.More capital in private equity transferred from Bond fund will make the portfolio less liquid. 



  1. Since donations and tuition fees will decline, university may need more support from the foundation to deal with operating issues, therefore the 3% cash equivalent funds are less than expected. 


Titan is relatively small for the proposed addition of private equity. Since donations and tuition fees will decline, university may need more support from the foundation to deal with operating issues, therefore the 3% cash equivalent funds are less than expected. 


----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

秋樣 · 2023年12月26日

好滴谢谢

lynn_品职助教 · 2023年12月26日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


加油!

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 370

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201805280100000401 问题如下 scuss two reasons why the proposeasset allocation is inappropriate for Titan. The proposeasset allocation for Titis not appropriate because:1 Given the shift in enrollment tren anclining nations resulting from the sanctions, Titwill likely neegreater liquity in the future because of the increaseprobability of higher outflows to support university operations. The proposeasset allocation shifts Titan’s allocation into risky assets (increases the relative equity holngs ancreases the relative bonholngs), whiwoulintrogreater uncertainty to their future value.2 Titis relatively small for the proposeaition of private equity. Access to suasset class private equity mconstrainefor smaller asset owners, suTitan, who mlathe relateinterninvestment expertise. Aitionally, the Sun-Fin Private Equity Funminimum investment level is $1 million. This level of investment in private equity woul10% of Titan’s totportfolio value. Given Titan’s clining financiposition e to clining enrollments anits resulting potentineefor liquity, private equity this minimum level of investment is not appropriate for Titan. 1.为什么Titan相对于PE投资的增加而言,规模相对较小?

2024-09-24 13:55 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000401 问题如下 scuss two reasons why the proposeasset allocation is inappropriate for Titan. The proposeasset allocation for Titis not appropriate because:1 Given the shift in enrollment tren anclining nations resulting from the sanctions, Titwill likely neegreater liquity in the future because of the increaseprobability of higher outflows to support university operations. The proposeasset allocation shifts Titan’s allocation into risky assets (increases the relative equity holngs ancreases the relative bonholngs), whiwoulintrogreater uncertainty to their future value.2 Titis relatively small for the proposeaition of private equity. Access to suasset class private equity mconstrainefor smaller asset owners, suTitan, who mlathe relateinterninvestment expertise. Aitionally, the Sun-Fin Private Equity Funminimum investment level is $1 million. This level of investment in private equity woul10% of Titan’s totportfolio value. Given Titan’s clining financiposition e to clining enrollments anits resulting potentineefor liquity, private equity this minimum level of investment is not appropriate for Titan. 这道题可以理解,只是想知道,如果说了两个关于为什么不能投pe的原因,算回答了两点吗?1.committecapital太高(10% of portfolio size) 2.no experience/no exposures to top managers还是说,这两条只能算一点?必须回答liquity的那方面才算答完整了

2024-06-25 19:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000401 问题如下 scuss two reasons why the proposeasset allocation is inappropriate for Titan. The proposeasset allocation for Titis not appropriate because:1 Given the shift in enrollment tren anclining nations resulting from the sanctions, Titwill likely neegreater liquity in the future because of the increaseprobability of higher outflows to support university operations. The proposeasset allocation shifts Titan’s allocation into risky assets (increases the relative equity holngs ancreases the relative bonholngs), whiwoulintrogreater uncertainty to their future value.2 Titis relatively small for the proposeaition of private equity. Access to suasset class private equity mconstrainefor smaller asset owners, suTitan, who mlathe relateinterninvestment expertise. Aitionally, the Sun-Fin Private Equity Funminimum investment level is $1 million. This level of investment in private equity woul10% of Titan’s totportfolio value. Given Titan’s clining financiposition e to clining enrollments anits resulting potentineefor liquity, private equity this minimum level of investment is not appropriate for Titan. 19题来说 实际只有9.7m来配置,那PE要求10%,就是0.97m 不满足 minimum investment 1m的要求,是否可以从这个角度作答?

2023-06-28 00:04 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000401 问题如下 scuss two reasons why the proposeasset allocation is inappropriate for Titan. The proposeasset allocation for Titis not appropriate because:1 Given the shift in enrollment tren anclining nations resulting from the sanctions, Titwill likely neegreater liquity in the future because of the increaseprobability of higher outflows to support university operations. The proposeasset allocation shifts Titan’s allocation into risky assets (increases the relative equity holngs ancreases the relative bonholngs), whiwoulintrogreater uncertainty to their future value.2 Titis relatively small for the proposeaition of private equity. Access to suasset class private equity mconstrainefor smaller asset owners, suTitan, who mlathe relateinterninvestment expertise. Aitionally, the Sun-Fin Private Equity Funminimum investment level is $1 million. This level of investment in private equity woul10% of Titan’s totportfolio value. Given Titan’s clining financiposition e to clining enrollments anits resulting potentineefor liquity, private equity this minimum level of investment is not appropriate for Titan. 答案第二点的知识点是哪里?看懂了,但是不知道为啥要说这些。

2023-03-28 19:13 1 · 回答