开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

尚好的青春 · 2023年12月19日

选项A,这个说法正确的吗?感觉有点牵强。只考虑提出通胀就能判断相同?不考虑汇率吗?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202206070100000301

问题如下:

Of Kumar’s three points regarding interest rate linkages among countries proposed for the new fund, she is least likely correct with respect to bond yields in:

选项:

A.Singapore and Sweden. B.Denmark. C.Chile.

解释:

Solution

B is correct. Kumar’s second point regarding Danish bonds is incorrect. When two currencies are pegged or linked, the bond yields of the country with the weaker currency are likely to rise higher unless the market is confident that the government will maintain the peg.

C is incorrect. Kumar’s first point regarding Chilean bonds is a true statement. If a country’s exchange rate is severely undervalued and is expected to rise substantially against another country’s, then bond yields in the first country will be lower than they would otherwise be in relation to the other country. Since Chile’s exchange rate relative to Great Britain’s is undervalued, we would expect the Chilean bond yields to be lower than they should be as compared to the yields on the British bonds.

A is incorrect. Kumar’s third point with respect to Singapore and Sweden is a true statement. Although real yields can vary, they can and do tend to move together.

题目考察的是利率与汇率的关联。Kumar关于丹麦债券的第二点论述是错误的。当两种货币挂钩或联系时,货币较弱的国家的债券收益率可能会上升,除非市场坚信政府将维持汇率盯住制度。

C是错误的。因为Kumar关于智利债券的第一点是对的。如果一个国家的汇率被严重低估,并且预计其相对于另一个国家的汇率将大幅上升,那么前者的债券收益率目前是比较低的。由于智利相对于英国的汇率被低估,我们预计智利的当前债券收益率低于其相对于英国债券收益率的应有水平(言外之意,应该更高才对)。

A是错误的。因为Kumar关于新加坡和瑞典的第三点论述是正确的。尽管实际收益率可能有所不同,但它们可以倾向于共同波动。

如题

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2023年12月20日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


只考虑提出通胀就能判断相同?不考虑汇率吗?


Hello,亲爱的同学~

基础讲义上有句话:实际汇率的变动率是0。因此这里不需要考虑汇率。


A选项是关于Singapore and Sweden。

原文中关于这两种货币的表述是,

After removing expected inflation, the real bond yield is likely to be similar in Singapore and Sweden.

这句话是符合“天下大同”的原理,如果抛开通胀这些不考虑,那么投资两国会获得相同的实际收益率(real return)。

因为这句话本身是正确的,而题目要选一个不正确的,所以A选项不入选。





----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 232

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202206070100000301 问题如下 Of Kumar’s three points regarng interest rate linkages among countries proposefor the new fun she is least likely correwith respeto bonyiel in: A.Singapore anSwen. B.nmark. C.Chile. SolutionB is correct. Kumar’s seconpoint regarng nish bon is incorrect. When two currencies are peggeor linke the bonyiel of the country with the weaker currenare likely to rise higher unless the market is confint ththe government will maintain the peg.C is incorrect. Kumar’s first point regarng Chilebon is a true statement. If a country’s exchange rate is severely unrvalueanis expecteto rise substantially against another country’s, then bonyiel in the first country will lower ththey woulotherwise in relation to the other country. SinChile’s exchange rate relative to GreBritain’s is unrvalue we woulexpethe Chilebonyiel to lower ththey shoulcompareto the yiel on the British bon.A is incorrect. Kumar’s thirpoint with respeto Singapore anSwen is a true statement. Although reyiel cvary, they can tento move together.题目考察的是利率与汇率的关联。Kumar关于丹麦债券的第二点论述是错误的。当两种货币挂钩或联系时,货币较弱的国家的债券收益率可能会上升,除非市场坚信政府将维持汇率盯住制度。C是错误的。因为Kumar关于智利债券的第一点是对的。如果一个国家的汇率被严重低估,并且预计其相对于另一个国家的汇率将大幅上升,那么前者的债券收益率目前是比较低的。由于智利相对于英国的汇率被低估,我们预计智利的当前债券收益率低于其相对于英国债券收益率的应有水平(言外之意,应该更高才对)。A是错误的。因为Kumar关于新加坡和瑞典的第三点论述是正确的。尽管实际收益率可能有所不同,但它们可以倾向于共同波动。 The peg linking nmark’s currento the euro is consireto risk anlikely to break. Therefore, nish bonyiel are expecteto op if the nish krone weakens relative to the euro.我的理解是因为债券有风险,所以要求的回报率会更高,就是yiel会上升虽然我做对了,但是我这么理解对不对?

2024-09-05 16:18 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206070100000301 问题如下 Of Kumar’s three points regarng interest rate linkages among countries proposefor the new fun she is least likely correwith respeto bonyiel in: A.Singapore anSwen. B.nmark. C.Chile. SolutionB is correct. Kumar’s seconpoint regarng nish bon is incorrect. When two currencies are peggeor linke the bonyiel of the country with the weaker currenare likely to rise higher unless the market is confint ththe government will maintain the peg.C is incorrect. Kumar’s first point regarng Chilebon is a true statement. If a country’s exchange rate is severely unrvalueanis expecteto rise substantially against another country’s, then bonyiel in the first country will lower ththey woulotherwise in relation to the other country. SinChile’s exchange rate relative to GreBritain’s is unrvalue we woulexpethe Chilebonyiel to lower ththey shoulcompareto the yiel on the British bon.A is incorrect. Kumar’s thirpoint with respeto Singapore anSwen is a true statement. Although reyiel cvary, they can tento move together.题目考察的是利率与汇率的关联。Kumar关于丹麦债券的第二点论述是错误的。当两种货币挂钩或联系时,货币较弱的国家的债券收益率可能会上升,除非市场坚信政府将维持汇率盯住制度。C是错误的。因为Kumar关于智利债券的第一点是对的。如果一个国家的汇率被严重低估,并且预计其相对于另一个国家的汇率将大幅上升,那么前者的债券收益率目前是比较低的。由于智利相对于英国的汇率被低估,我们预计智利的当前债券收益率低于其相对于英国债券收益率的应有水平(言外之意,应该更高才对)。A是错误的。因为Kumar关于新加坡和瑞典的第三点论述是正确的。尽管实际收益率可能有所不同,但它们可以倾向于共同波动。 在哪里可以看到chile的前提是固定汇率制?对应基础班讲义的第几页,麻烦老师截下图singapore那句是怎么看出来PPP的看到别的讲解说利率和汇率的关系分成固定汇率制和利率平价两种,可以分别帮忙梳理下吗

2024-08-03 12:26 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206070100000301 问题如下 Of Kumar’s three points regarng interest rate linkages among countries proposefor the new fun she is least likely correwith respeto bonyiel in: A.Singapore anSwen. B.nmark. C.Chile. SolutionB is correct. Kumar’s seconpoint regarng nish bon is incorrect. When two currencies are peggeor linke the bonyiel of the country with the weaker currenare likely to rise higher unless the market is confint ththe government will maintain the peg.C is incorrect. Kumar’s first point regarng Chilebon is a true statement. If a country’s exchange rate is severely unrvalueanis expecteto rise substantially against another country’s, then bonyiel in the first country will lower ththey woulotherwise in relation to the other country. SinChile’s exchange rate relative to GreBritain’s is unrvalue we woulexpethe Chilebonyiel to lower ththey shoulcompareto the yiel on the British bon.A is incorrect. Kumar’s thirpoint with respeto Singapore anSwen is a true statement. Although reyiel cvary, they can tento move together.题目考察的是利率与汇率的关联。Kumar关于丹麦债券的第二点论述是错误的。当两种货币挂钩或联系时,货币较弱的国家的债券收益率可能会上升,除非市场坚信政府将维持汇率盯住制度。C是错误的。因为Kumar关于智利债券的第一点是对的。如果一个国家的汇率被严重低估,并且预计其相对于另一个国家的汇率将大幅上升,那么前者的债券收益率目前是比较低的。由于智利相对于英国的汇率被低估,我们预计智利的当前债券收益率低于其相对于英国债券收益率的应有水平(言外之意,应该更高才对)。A是错误的。因为Kumar关于新加坡和瑞典的第三点论述是正确的。尽管实际收益率可能有所不同,但它们可以倾向于共同波动。 关于Singapore anSwen的那句描述是怎么判断出来是对的?

2024-04-27 10:21 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206070100000301问题如下Of Kumar’s three points regarng interest rate linkages among countries proposefor the new fun she is least likely correwith respeto bonyiel in:A.Singapore anSwen.B.nmark.C.Chile. SolutionB is correct. Kumar’s seconpoint regarng nish bon is incorrect. When two currencies are peggeor linke the bonyiel of the country with the weaker currenare likely to rise higher unless the market is confint ththe government will maintain the peg.C is incorrect. Kumar’s first point regarng Chilebon is a true statement. If a country’s exchange rate is severely unrvalueanis expecteto rise substantially against another country’s, then bonyiel in the first country will lower ththey woulotherwise in relation to the other country. SinChile’s exchange rate relative to GreBritain’s is unrvalue we woulexpethe Chilebonyiel to lower ththey shoulcompareto the yiel on the British bon.A is incorrect. Kumar’s thirpoint with respeto Singapore anSwen is a true statement. Although reyiel cvary, they can tento move together.题目考察的是利率与汇率的关联。Kumar关于丹麦债券的第二点论述是错误的。当两种货币挂钩或联系时,货币较弱的国家的债券收益率可能会上升,除非市场坚信政府将维持汇率盯住制度。C是错误的。因为Kumar关于智利债券的第一点是对的。如果一个国家的汇率被严重低估,并且预计其相对于另一个国家的汇率将大幅上升,那么前者的债券收益率目前是比较低的。由于智利相对于英国的汇率被低估,我们预计智利的当前债券收益率低于其相对于英国债券收益率的应有水平(言外之意,应该更高才对)。A是错误的。因为Kumar关于新加坡和瑞典的第三点论述是正确的。尽管实际收益率可能有所不同,但它们可以倾向于共同波动。 这句话是依据什么推导出来的?

2023-08-18 20:33 1 · 回答