开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

kk大美女 · 2023年11月20日

可以详细解释这3个statement,到底错在哪里啊?解释看不懂

  1. Illiquid assets offer both diversification benefits and an expected return discount relative to similar liquid assets as compensation for illiquidity.
  2. Easily tracked indexes in asset classes similar to that of an illiquid asset often do not represent the non-idiosyncratic risk of the illiquid asset very accurately.
  3. Unfortunately, there are no low-cost passive investment vehicles available to allow one to closely track the aggregate performance of less liquid asset classes.


Which of Gruber’s statements regarding illiquid assets is most accurate?

  1. Statement 1
  2. Statement 3
  3. Statement 2


B is correct. Statement 3 is the most accurate. Low-cost passive vehicles for tracking performance exist for publicly traded liquid assets but do not exist for illiquid assets.

A is incorrect. Statement 1 is incorrect because an illiquid asset usually has a premium associated with its return due to the illiquidity.

C is incorrect. Statement 2 is incorrect because easily tracked indexes for an asset class usually do not capture the idiosyncratic risk component of less liquid assets.

1 个答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2023年11月21日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


1、low-cost passive investment vehicles not being available, which would allow investors to closely track the aggregate performance of private equity and other less liquid asset classes.


流动性差的资产缺少被广泛接受的指数。由于流动性差的资产很难计算准确的市值,如果指数以资产市值为权重,那么这个衡量流动性差的资产的指数就很难计算。即使存在流动性差的资产的指数,基金经理也很难通过被动投资进行追踪,因为流动性差的资产交易成本太高。


这个结论记一下,在记忆时可以以房地产为例进行记忆,很好理解。


2、Statement 1是不正确的,因为非流动资产相较于相似的流动性较好的资产,通常因其流动性较差而产生风险溢价而不是折扣。


Statement 2是不正确的, 和流动性较差的资产近似的但易于跟踪的指数是可以准确地代表流动性较差的资产的系统性风险的,但不能代表流动性较差的资产的非系统性风险。


----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 389

    浏览
相关问题