NO.PZ2023091802000065
问题如下:
Company XYZ operates in the U.S. On April 1, 2009, it has a net
trade receivable of EUR 5,000,000 from an export contract to Germany. The
company expects to receive this amount on Oct. 1, 2009. The CFO of XYZ wants to
protect the value of this receivable. On April 1, 2009, the EUR spot rate is
1.34, and the 6-month EUR forward rate is 1.33. The CFO can lock in an exchange
rate by taking a position in the forward contract. Alternatively, he can sell a
6-month EUR 5,000,000 call option with strike price of 1.34. The CFO thinks
that selling an option is better than taking a forward position because if the
EUR goes up, XYZ can take delivery of the USD at 1.34, which is better than the
outright forward rate of 1.33. If the EUR goes down, the contract will not be
exercised. So, XYZ will pocket the premium obtained from selling the call
option.
What can be concluded about the CFO's analysis?
选项:
A.
CFO's analysis is correct. The company is better off whichever way the EUR rate goes.
B.
CFO's analysis is not correct. The company will suffer if the EUR goes up sharply.
C.
CFO's analysis is not correct. The company will suffer if the EUR moves within a narrow range.
D.
CFO's analysis is not correct. The company will suffer if the EUR goes down sharply.
解释:
The CFO's analysis is
incorrect because there is unlimited downside risk. The option premium received
is a fixed amount, and if the EUR declines sharply, the value of the underlying
receivable goes down as well. If instead the EUR moves in a narrow range, that
would be good, but there is no guarantee of course that this will occur.
Sell call option亏损不应该在价格上涨的时候吗 为什么是go down的情况呢