Marlin asks Betta if reduced form models of corporate credit risk provide advantages over structural models. Betta responds that reduced form models have less restrictive assumptions than structural models because of the one critical assumption that cannot be relaxed. He notes two weaknesses with regard to reduced form models: (1) The use of past observations to predict the future requires that it be formulated and back tested properly, and (2) credit risk measures are biased by implicit estimation procedures.
Finally, Betta would like to examine the term structure of credit spreads for Bay Corp. The company has a number of coupon bonds outstanding across the maturity spectrum that should facilitate his analysis. He notices the market prices of the bonds are lower than would be implied by results of either a structural or reduced form model. Betta is confident he has correctly estimated the price of the zero-coupon bonds implied by the coupon bond prices, which in this case rank equally in the capital structure.
Q. Which comment made by Betta is least likely correct with regard to reduced form models relative to structural models?
- His comment regarding assumptions
- His comment regarding the first weakness
- His comment regarding the second weakness
这里答案和课程讲解都说到第二个weakness是
structural models的弱点,可是我记得reduce model 参数好像有两个估计方式,一个是历史数据,另一个好像也是implicit estimation,不知我记得对不对,如果是这样,那这个模型不是也有这个缺点吗