开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

齐王木木 · 2023年10月29日

经典题有pdf版吗?

NO.PZ2023040501000001

问题如下:

Claire Munroe, the senior publishing analyst at North Star Securities, has begun to review the recent financial performance of Suburban Publishers, Inc. Suburban, which reports under IFRS, has a history of purchasing community news groups from around the country and holding them for several years even if they are not initially profitable. The growth of online publishing has been difficult on many major newspapers, but community newspapers have been particularly resilient.

At the start of 2013, Suburban purchased 24% of the 1 million outstanding shares of West Reach Community News Group for $12 million. West Reach’s income and dividends since the purchase to the end of 2016 are shown in Exhibit 1.

Exhibit 1 West Reach Community News Group Income and Dividends, 2013–2016 ($ thousands)


As Munroe reviewed her working papers, she came across a notation that she had made following the acquisition: “A very strange long-term acquisition for Suburban. West Reach’s majority holder, William French (who is now 81 years old), holds 72% of the shares and controls the board with an iron hand. Dividends are paid out according to his needs and preferences. Suburban was unsuccessful in getting any of its preferred candidates elected to the board or exerting any influence on West Reach’s dividend policy.” An interesting development occurred near the end of 2016, when Mr. French sold 100,000 of his shares to one of Suburban’s competitors for $6.2 million. Just before Monroe closed her file on this firm, she added, “Mr. French is still firmly in control but changes may be on the horizon—he is now a few years older”.

The most appropriate value (in millions) for Suburban’s investment in West Reach at December 31, 2016, is:

选项:

A.

$12.00

B.

$13.68

C.

$14.88

解释:

Although Suburban’s ownership interest (24%) in West Reach exceeds the amount that is normally deemed sufficient to presume significant influence (20%), the inability to elect directors or influence the firm’s policy making indicates a lack of significant influence. It would thus be inappropriate to account for its holdings under the equity method. Instead West Reach should be considered a passive investment of Suburban and carried at full value. Although difficult to value because of its private status, the recent sale by Mr. French provides an observable price that can be used to revalue Suburban’s holdings per the table below.


A is incorrect. This is the cost value of the investment.

B is incorrect. This would be the value if West Reach was considered an equity investment, per

the following table:


有pdf版文件吗 想打印成纸质的做

1 个答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2023年10月29日

同学你好,有的哦,以下是电脑端截图——红色部分点开就可以找到对应的经典题版本下载

手机端也一样,请看以下截图黄色部分

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 225

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023040501000001 问题如下 Claire Munroe, the senior publishing analyst North StSecurities, hbegun to review the recent financiperformanof SuburbPublishers, InSuburban, whireports unr IFRS, ha history of purchasing community news groups from arounthe country anholng them for severyears even if they are not initially profitable. The growth of online publishing hbeen fficult on many major newspapers, but community newspapers have been particularly resilient.the start of 2013, Suburbpurchase24% of the 1 million outstanng shares of West ReaCommunity News Group for $12 million. West Reach’s income anvin sinthe purchase to the enof 2016 are shown in Exhibit 1.Exhibit 1 West ReaCommunity News Group Income anvin, 2013–2016 ($ thousan)Munroe revieweher working papers, she came across a notation thshe hma following the acquisition: “A very strange long-term acquisition for Suburban. West Reach’s majority holr, WilliFren(who is now 81 years ol, hol 72% of the shares ancontrols the boarwith iron han vin are paiout accorng to his nee anpreferences. Suburbwunsuccessful in getting any of its preferrecantes electeto the boaror exerting any influenon West Reach’s vinpolicy.” interesting velopment occurrenethe enof 2016, when Mr. Frensol100,000 of his shares to one of Suburban’s competitors for $6.2 million. Just before Monroe closeher file on this firm, she ae “Mr. Frenis still firmly in control but changes mon the horizon—he is now a few years olr”. The most appropriate value (in millions) for Suburban’s investment in West Reacember 31, 2016, is: A.$12.00 B.$13.68 C.$14.88 Although Suburban’s ownership interest (24%) in West Reaexcee the amount this normally emesufficient to presume significant influen(20%), the inability to elerectors or influenthe firm’s polimaking incates a laof significant influence. It woulthus inappropriate to account for its holngs unr the equity metho InsteWest Reashoulconsirea passive investment of Suburbancarriefull value. Although fficult to value because of its private status, the recent sale Mr. Frenprovis observable prithcuseto revalue Suburban’s holngs per the table below.A is incorrect. This is the cost value of the investment.B is incorrect. This woulthe value if West Reawconsireequity investment, perthe following table: 我错误按照14M股计算,但发现没有

2024-08-03 10:27 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023040501000001 问题如下 Claire Munroe, the senior publishing analyst North StSecurities, hbegun to review the recent financiperformanof SuburbPublishers, InSuburban, whireports unr IFRS, ha history of purchasing community news groups from arounthe country anholng them for severyears even if they are not initially profitable. The growth of online publishing hbeen fficult on many major newspapers, but community newspapers have been particularly resilient.the start of 2013, Suburbpurchase24% of the 1 million outstanng shares of West ReaCommunity News Group for $12 million. West Reach’s income anvin sinthe purchase to the enof 2016 are shown in Exhibit 1.Exhibit 1 West ReaCommunity News Group Income anvin, 2013–2016 ($ thousan)Munroe revieweher working papers, she came across a notation thshe hma following the acquisition: “A very strange long-term acquisition for Suburban. West Reach’s majority holr, WilliFren(who is now 81 years ol, hol 72% of the shares ancontrols the boarwith iron han vin are paiout accorng to his nee anpreferences. Suburbwunsuccessful in getting any of its preferrecantes electeto the boaror exerting any influenon West Reach’s vinpolicy.” interesting velopment occurrenethe enof 2016, when Mr. Frensol100,000 of his shares to one of Suburban’s competitors for $6.2 million. Just before Monroe closeher file on this firm, she ae “Mr. Frenis still firmly in control but changes mon the horizon—he is now a few years olr”. The most appropriate value (in millions) for Suburban’s investment in West Reacember 31, 2016, is: A.$12.00 B.$13.68 C.$14.88 Although Suburban’s ownership interest (24%) in West Reaexcee the amount this normally emesufficient to presume significant influen(20%), the inability to elerectors or influenthe firm’s polimaking incates a laof significant influence. It woulthus inappropriate to account for its holngs unr the equity metho InsteWest Reashoulconsirea passive investment of Suburbancarriefull value. Although fficult to value because of its private status, the recent sale Mr. Frenprovis observable prithcuseto revalue Suburban’s holngs per the table below.A is incorrect. This is the cost value of the investment.B is incorrect. This woulthe value if West Reawconsireequity investment, perthe following table: 这道题不是选13.68吗?

2024-04-12 22:53 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023040501000001 问题如下 Claire Munroe, the senior publishing analyst North StSecurities, hbegun to review the recent financiperformanof SuburbPublishers, InSuburban, whireports unr IFRS, ha history of purchasing community news groups from arounthe country anholng them for severyears even if they are not initially profitable. The growth of online publishing hbeen fficult on many major newspapers, but community newspapers have been particularly resilient.the start of 2013, Suburbpurchase24% of the 1 million outstanng shares of West ReaCommunity News Group for $12 million. West Reach’s income anvin sinthe purchase to the enof 2016 are shown in Exhibit 1.Exhibit 1 West ReaCommunity News Group Income anvin, 2013–2016 ($ thousan)Munroe revieweher working papers, she came across a notation thshe hma following the acquisition: “A very strange long-term acquisition for Suburban. West Reach’s majority holr, WilliFren(who is now 81 years ol, hol 72% of the shares ancontrols the boarwith iron han vin are paiout accorng to his nee anpreferences. Suburbwunsuccessful in getting any of its preferrecantes electeto the boaror exerting any influenon West Reach’s vinpolicy.” interesting velopment occurrenethe enof 2016, when Mr. Frensol100,000 of his shares to one of Suburban’s competitors for $6.2 million. Just before Monroe closeher file on this firm, she ae “Mr. Frenis still firmly in control but changes mon the horizon—he is now a few years olr”. The most appropriate value (in millions) for Suburban’s investment in West Reacember 31, 2016, is: A.$12.00 B.$13.68 C.$14.88 Although Suburban’s ownership interest (24%) in West Reaexcee the amount this normally emesufficient to presume significant influen(20%), the inability to elerectors or influenthe firm’s polimaking incates a laof significant influence. It woulthus inappropriate to account for its holngs unr the equity metho InsteWest Reashoulconsirea passive investment of Suburbancarriefull value. Although fficult to value because of its private status, the recent sale Mr. Frenprovis observable prithcuseto revalue Suburban’s holngs per the table below.A is incorrect. This is the cost value of the investment.B is incorrect. This woulthe value if West Reawconsireequity investment, perthe following table: why share helS is 240,000?

2023-05-01 11:58 1 · 回答