NO.PZ2023040601000052
问题如下:
Rom informs Galic that GWP also uses a technique commonly referred to as scenario analysis to examine how strategies perform in different structural regimes. Exhibit 2 compares the performance of two of GWP’s factor allocation strategies in different regimes:
Comparing the two strategies in Exhibit 2, the best risk-adjusted performance is demonstrated by:
选项:
A.Strategy II in periods of low volatility and recession.
Strategy I in periods of high volatility and non-recession.
Strategy II in periods of high volatility and non-recession.
解释:
A is correct. Using the Sharpe ratio, the best risk-adjusted relative performance can be determined by comparing the sensitivity of the two strategies under differing macroeconomic regimes: recession versus non-recession and high volatility versus low volatility. The best risk-adjusted return will exhibit the highest Sharpe ratio.
Strategy II demonstrates higher risk-adjusted returns compared with Strategy I under all four macroeconomic conditions, particularly in periods of low volatility, when the Sharpe ratio outperformance is 0.96, and recessions, when the Sharpe ratio outperformance is 1.56.
无论策略1、2,为什么波动率高,反而sharpe ratio低?而且经济衰退时应该收益率低与非衰退时?
基于此,我选了B, 因为最符合高波动高收益的逻辑,和经济非衰退期收益率高的逻辑。
题目直接让选sharpe ratio最高的,不太理解题意?