开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Flying马 · 2023年10月16日

违约?

NO.PZ2018062007000091

问题如下:

A swap is:

选项:

A.

more like a forward than a futures contract.

B.

subject to simultaneous default by both parties.

C.

based on an exchange of two series of fixed cash flows

解释:

A is correct. A swap is a bit more like a forward contract than a futures contract in that it is an OTC contract, so it is privately negotiated and subject to default. B is incorrect because in a swap, although either party can default, only one party can do so at a particular time. Money owed is based on the net owed by one party to the other, and only the party owing the greater amount can default to the counterparty owing the lesser amount. C is incorrect because a swap involves an exchange between parties in which at least one party pays a variable series of cash flows determined by an underlying asset or rate.

中文解析:

A对,掉期合约更像远期合约而不是期货合约,因为它是一种场外交易合约,所以它是私下协商的,可能会违约。

B是不正确的,因为在交换中,尽管任何一方都可以违约,但在某一时间点只有一方可以违约。

C是不正确的,因为掉期涉及各方之间的交换,并非所有的swap都市固定现金流之间的互换,虽然现实中有一些swap是固定换固定,但是不能以偏概全

前面做了一道题  解析说只有short方会违约?

1 个答案

pzqa35 · 2023年10月16日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


Swap的本质是一系列的远期合约,因为远期合约都是场外进行交易,因此是存在对手方违约的风险的,而像futures这种有交易所进行交易的,违约风险就非常的小。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 169

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2018062007000091 问题如下 A swis: more like a forwartha futures contract. subjeto simultaneous fault both parties. C.baseon exchange of two series of fixecash flows A is correct. A swis a bit more like a forwarcontratha futures contrain thit is OTC contract, so it is privately negotiateansubjeto fault. B is incorrebecause in a swap, although either party cfault, only one party c so a particultime. Money oweis baseon the net oweone party to the other, anonly the party owing the greater amount cfault to the counterparty owing the lesser amount. C is incorrebecause a swinvolves exchange between parties in whileast one party pays a variable series of cash flows termineunrlying asset or rate. 中文解析A对,掉期合约更像远期合约而不是期货合约,因为它是一种场外交易合约,所以它是私下协商的,可能会违约。B是不正确的,因为在交换中,尽管任何一方都可以违约,但在某一时间点只有一方可以违约。C是不正确的,因为掉期涉及各方之间的交换,并非所有的swap都市固定现金流之间的互换,虽然现实中有一些swap是固定换固定,但是不能以偏概全 C错误的原因,与two series,没关系吗,为啥是两个系列,应该是 set of 吧?

2023-08-02 21:33 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2018062007000091问题如下 A swis:more like a forwartha futures contract. subjeto simultaneous fault both parties. C.baseon exchange of two series of fixecash flows A is correct. A swis a bit more like a forwarcontratha futures contrain thit is OTC contract, so it is privately negotiateansubjeto fault. B is incorrebecause in a swap, although either party cfault, only one party c so a particultime. Money oweis baseon the net oweone party to the other, anonly the party owing the greater amount cfault to the counterparty owing the lesser amount. C is incorrebecause a swinvolves exchange between parties in whileast one party pays a variable series of cash flows termineunrlying asset or rate. 中文解析A对,掉期合约更像远期合约而不是期货合约,因为它是一种场外交易合约,所以它是私下协商的,可能会违约。B是不正确的,因为在交换中,尽管任何一方都可以违约,但在某一时间点只有一方可以违约。C是不正确的,因为掉期涉及各方之间的交换,其中至少一方支付由标的资产或利率决定的可变现金流系列,而不能都是固定的现金流。 请问为什么要在swap中强调尽管两方都有可能违约,但是在某一时点只有一方会违约?forwarfutures在到期时不是也只有一方会违约吗?

2022-07-24 20:01 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018062007000091 subjeto simultaneous fault both parties. baseon exchange of two series of fixecash flows A is correct. A swis a bit more like a forwarcontratha futures contrain thit is OTC contract, so it is privately negotiateansubjeto fault. B is incorrebecause in a swap, although either party cfault, only one party c so a particultime. Money oweis baseon the net oweone party to the other, anonly the party owing the greater amount cfault to the counterparty owing the lesser amount. C is incorrebecause a swinvolves exchange between parties in whileast one party pays a variable series of cash flows termineunrlying asset or rate. 为什么同一时间只有一方可以违约呢

2021-02-19 16:52 1 · 回答

C可以一下为什么?

2020-03-02 17:47 1 · 回答