NO.PZ2021101401000021
问题如下:
Rom informs Galic that GWP also uses a technique commonly referred to as scenario analysis to examine how strategies perform in different structural regimes. Exhibit 2 compares the performance of two of GWP’s factor allocation strategies in different regimes:
Comparing the two strategies in Exhibit 2, the best risk-adjusted performance is demonstrated by:
选项:
A.Strategy II in periods of low volatility and recession.
Strategy I in periods of high volatility and non-recession.
Strategy II in periods of high volatility and non-recession.
解释:
A is correct. Using the Sharpe ratio, the best risk-adjusted relative performance can be determined by comparing the sensitivity of the two strategies under differing macroeconomic regimes: recession versus non-recession and high volatility versus low volatility. The best risk-adjusted return will exhibit the highest Sharpe ratio.
Strategy II demonstrates higher risk-adjusted returns compared with Strategy I under all four macroeconomic conditions, particularly in periods of low volatility, when the Sharpe ratio outperformance is 0.96, and recessions, when the Sharpe ratio outperformance is 1.56.
解析中采用SR(strategy II)-SR(strategyI)来选择最优策略,得出low σ和recession场景下表现最优。我的问题是可以不作差,直接通过strategy II中SR绝对值来判断吗?
这题比较特殊,两种判断法结论相同,如果遇到结论不同时一定要作差来判断吗,原理是什么?