开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

506623496 · 2023年08月23日

能解释一下这两个方法的对比吗

NO.PZ2023010903000053

问题如下:

Clickman then asks Leeter how he should determine the style of the funds he is considering. Leeter responds, “The best way to determine the style of the funds is to perform a returns-based analysis by regressing the past returns on the funds against the past returns on a number of style indexes to determine which styles are most prevalent within each fund. Unfortunately, this method tends to not be as easy to perform as holdings-based analysis. However, returns-analysis allows for a deeper level of analysis relative to holdings-analysis.”

Leeter’s reply to Clickman concerning determining the style of funds is most accurate in regard to the:

选项:

A.

description of a returns-based analysis

B.

applicability of returns-analysis versus holding-analysis

C.

comparison of depth of analysis between returns-analysis versus holdings-analysis

解释:

Leeter’s reply is correct in regard to the description of returns-based analysis. Regressing a fund’s past returns against the past returns from a number of style indexes is a returns-style analysis.

B is incorrect. Leeter’s reply is incorrect in regard to the applicability of returns-analysis versus holdings-analysis. Returns-analysis is easier to implement than holdings-analysis because data are more readily available.

C is incorrect. Leeter’s reply is incorrect in regard to the comparison of depth analysis between the two methods. Holdings-based analysis allows for a deeper level of analysis when compared with returns-analysis because holdings-analysis uses the actual portfolio holdings. The analysis is more accurate and generates more information for making style allocation decisions.

记忆的时候后总容易混淆,本题反复做错

1 个答案
已采纳答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2023年08月24日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


这里都是固定的结论。

holding based 因为需要看portfolio的具体持仓,所以对于风格的分析,要比return -based 更准确,这是优点。

缺点是,holding based 需要更多信息,因此成本更高。同时也有windows dressing效应。


return based,不需要知道持仓,把portfolio收益和各个因子的收益,做回归,通过回归系数分析,portfolio用了什么风格。

好处是,需要的信息少,做起来方便。

缺点是:分析结论,不够准确。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 444

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023010903000053问题如下 Clickmthen asks Leeter how he shoultermine the style of the fun he is consiring. Leeter respon, “The best wto termine the style of the fun is to perform a returns-baseanalysis regressing the past returns on the fun against the past returns on a number of style inxes to termine whistyles are most prevalent within eafun Unfortunately, this methoten to not easy to perform holngs-baseanalysis. However, returns-analysis allows for a eper level of analysis relative to holngs-analysis.”Leeter’s reply to Clickmconcerning termining the style of fun is most accurate in regarto the: A.scription of a returns-baseanalysisB.applicability of returns-analysis versus holng-analysisC.comparison of pth of analysis between returns-analysis versus holngs-analysis Leeter’s reply is correin regarto the scription of returns-baseanalysis. Regressing a funs past returns against the past returns from a number of style inxes is a returns-style analysis.B is incorrect. Leeter’s reply is incorrein regarto the applicability of returns-analysis versus holngs-analysis. Returns-analysis is easier to implement thholngs-analysis because ta are more realy available.C is incorrect. Leeter’s reply is incorrein regarto the comparison of pth analysis between the two metho. Holngs-baseanalysis allows for a eper level of analysis when comparewith returns-analysis because holngs-analysis uses the actuportfolio holngs. The analysis is more accurate angenerates more information for making style allocation cisions. 题干中“The best wto termine the style of the fun is to perform a returns-baseanalysi”中的的best way,是否与课件中的“holng-analysis is more accurate threturn- baseanalysis”矛盾

2024-01-23 15:36 1 · 回答