NO.PZ2022123002000023
问题如下:
Traldi suggests that the
use of put options might be a better way to hedge currency exposure. Campos
responds that there are better options-based strategies that can exploit market
views and reduce hedging costs. She suggests the following strategies:
Strategy 1. For AUD exposure, the
appropriate strategy is to be long put options at a strike price of 2.1046,
short put options with a strike price 2.1006, and short call options with a
strike price of 2.1456.
Strategy
2. For CHF exposure, the appropriate strategy is to be long put options at a
strike price of 2.5309, short put options with a strike price 2.5049, and short
call options with a strike price of 2.5669.
Is Campos most
likely correct that Strategy 1 and Strategy 2 will accomplish the goals of exploiting
market views and reducing hedging costs?
选项:
A.No, she is incorrect about reducing hedging costs
Yes
No, she is incorrect about exploiting market views
解释:
Correct Answer: C
Campos suggests
that both strategies help reduce hedging costs and allow the manager to exploit
a market view. While it is true that both strategies help reduce hedging costs
through premiums collected on short calls and puts, they both do not exploit
the market view on the currencies, specifically, Strategy 1 does not. Exhibit 3
indicates that the expectation is for the AUD to depreciate to BRL/AUD 2.0355
and for the CHF to appreciate to BRL/CHF 2.5642. Strategy 1, the short seagull
on the AUD, only provides downside protection to BRL/AUD 2.1006 (when the short
put kicks in and neutralizes the hedge), not BRL/AUD 2.0355. Under Strategy 2,
the expectation is for an appreciation to BRL/CHF 2.5642; here the option
premium is pocketed and because the option is written with a strike of BRL/CHF
2.5669, it will expire worthless if the rate never gets to BRL/CHF 2.5669
A is incorrect. It
is true that both strategies help reduce hedging costs through premiums
collected on short call and put.
B is incorrect. It
is true that both strategies help reduce hedging costs through premiums
collected on short call and put, but they both do not accommodate the market view
on the currencies.
Strategy 1: For AUD exposure, the appropriate strategy is to be long put options at a strike price of 2.1046, short put options with a strike price 2.1006,
不能表达市场观点是因为同时做long put + short put 吗?如果只是单做long put at strike at 2.1046,应该是表达了市场观点的吧。