开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

🌊Yuri🌊 · 2023年07月18日

NO.PZ2022061601000009

问题如下:

A US company expanding critical spare part inventories for local customers made at its existing Canadian facility after a supply chain disruption is most likely using the coping tactic of:

选项:

A.reshoring the essentials. B.re-globalizing production. C.doubling down on key markets.

解释:

A is correct. Te COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for certain essential supply chains to be rebuilt domestically for emergency situations, with availability of critical spare parts being an analogy. Te close integration of the US and Canadian economies through the revised NAFTA agreement effectively makes expanded production at an existing Canadian factory an example of reducing manufacturing risk by relocating to home countries via reshoring.
B is incorrect because instead of reducing manufacturing risk by duplicating or fortifying its supply chain, the company is simply continuing to use its existing capacity more intensively.

C is incorrect because although the production is intended to better supply its home market, there is no evidence that the company is expanding its presence in the US market or shifting its focus to the exclusion of available opportunities elsewhere.

A是正确的。COVID-19大流行凸显了在国内重建某些关键供应链以应对紧急情况的必要性,关键备件的可用性就是一个例子。修订后的北美自由贸易协定使美国和加拿大经济紧密结合,有效地扩大了加拿大现有工厂的生产,通过回流将工厂转移到母国来降低制造风险。

B是不正确的,因为该公司并没有通过复制或加强其供应链来降低制造风险,而是只是继续更密集地使用其现有的产能。

C是不正确的,因为尽管生产是为了更好地供应其国内市场,但没有证据表明该公司正在扩大其在美国市场的存在,或将其重点转移到排除其他可用的机会。

为什么加拿大和美国是一体的呢。reshorting不是在本国进行的吗

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2023年07月18日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


为什么加拿大和美国是一体的呢。reshorting不是在本国进行的吗

因为美国可以控制加拿大,而且修订了自由贸易协定后,货物流通也没有关税,可以看成是一体的。

重建不一定必须在本国,在自己能控制的国家重建也是可以的。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 1808

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022061601000009 问题如下 A US company expanng criticspare part inventories for loccustomers ma its existing Canafacility after a supply chain sruption is most likely using the coping tactic of: A.reshoring the essentials. B.re-globalizing proction. C.ubling wn on key markets. A is correct. Te COVI19 panmic hhighlightethe neefor certain essentisupply chains to rebuilt mestically for emergensituations, with availability of criticspare parts being analogy. Te close integration of the US anCanaeconomies through the reviseNAFTA agreement effectively makes expanproction existing Canafactory example of recing manufacturing risk relocating to home countries via reshoring. B is incorrebecause insteof recing manufacturing risk plicating or fortifying its supply chain, the company is simply continuing to use its existing capacity more intensively. C is incorrebecause although the proction is intento better supply its home market, there is no evinththe company is expanng its presenin the US market or shifting its focus to the exclusion of available opportunities elsewhere.A是正确的。COVI19大流行凸显了在国内重建某些关键供应链以应对紧急情况的必要性,关键备件的可用性就是一个例子。修订后的北美自由贸易协定使美国和加拿大经济紧密结合,有效地扩大了加拿大现有工厂的生产,通过回流将工厂转移到母国来降低制造风险。B是不正确的,因为该公司并没有通过复制或加强其供应链来降低制造风险,而是只是继续更密集地使用其现有的产能。C是不正确的,因为尽管生产是为了更好地供应其国内市场,但没有证据表明该公司正在扩大其在美国市场的存在,或将其重点转移到排除其他可用的机会。 题目能翻译下吗?不是很明白

2023-02-22 16:49 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2022061601000009 问题如下 A US company expanng criticspare part inventories for loccustomers ma its existing Canafacility after a supply chain sruption is most likely using the coping tactic of: A.reshoring the essentials. B.re-globalizing proction. C.ubling wn on key markets. A is correct. Te COVI19 panmic hhighlightethe neefor certain essentisupply chains to rebuilt mestically for emergensituations, with availability of criticspare parts being analogy. Te close integration of the US anCanaeconomies through the reviseNAFTA agreement effectively makes expanproction existing Canafactory example of recing manufacturing risk relocating to home countries via reshoring. B is incorrebecause insteof recing manufacturing risk plicating or fortifying its supply chain, the company is simply continuing to use its existing capacity more intensively. C is incorrebecause although the proction is intento better supply its home market, there is no evinththe company is expanng its presenin the US market or shifting its focus to the exclusion of available opportunities elsewhere.A是正确的。COVI19大流行凸显了在国内重建某些关键供应链以应对紧急情况的必要性,关键备件的可用性就是一个例子。修订后的北美自由贸易协定使美国和加拿大经济紧密结合,有效地扩大了加拿大现有工厂的生产,通过回流将工厂转移到母国来降低制造风险。B是不正确的,因为该公司并没有通过复制或加强其供应链来降低制造风险,而是只是继续更密集地使用其现有的产能。C是不正确的,因为尽管生产是为了更好地供应其国内市场,但没有证据表明该公司正在扩大其在美国市场的存在,或将其重点转移到排除其他可用的机会。 A是如何体现美国把在加拿大的供应链搬回母国了?

2022-12-07 05:42 1 · 回答