开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

· 2023年07月05日

B选项理解

NO.PZ2018122701000044

问题如下:

Under these assumptions - in particular: a flat yield curve and constant yield volatility of 1.0% - why can we expect cash flow mapping to produce a lower diversified VaR than either duration and principal mapping?

选项:

A.

The risk measures are non-linear.

B.

Due to imperfect correlations between pairwise risk factors.

C.

Fewer total cash flows will be mapped.

D.

We cannot expect a lower diversified VaR.

解释:

B is correct.

考点 Mapping to Fixed Income Portfolios

解析 The diversified VaR is lower due to two factors. First, risk measures are not perfectly linear with maturity. Second, correlations are below unity, which reduces risk even further.

老师好,请问这个b选项说的是后面会提到的component risk吗?然后还想问一下课堂上说的convexity是指三种mapping都会遇到的还是就第二种duration mapping跟麦考利久期有关才是呈现凸性呢?谢谢!

1 个答案

DD仔_品职助教 · 2023年07月06日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学你好,

你说的是第四张会学到的correlation risk吗?不是说的一个东西

这里B选项讲的是,假设收益率曲线是水平的,波动σ稳定,所以各个利率点上的VaR是一样的,所以在计算整体的 diversified VaR 时,利用CF mapping来计算的话,时会考虑到各种风险因子的,那么风险因子之间的correlation<1,就会产生分散化效果。所以可以导致CFmapping更小。

Duration mapping是没有考虑到convexity的,因为利率变动导致的价格变动是包含一阶导和二阶导的关系的,那么一阶导是duration,二阶导就是convexity,duration mapping之所以叫duration mapping就是因为他只考虑到了duration,是没有考虑到convexity的。如果说从考虑的是否全面角度出发,CF mapping是最全面的。因为principle mapping只考虑principle,duration mapping只考虑duration。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 333

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2018122701000044 问题如下 Unr these assumptions - in particular: a flat yielcurve anconstant yielvolatility of 1.0% - why cwe expecash flow mapping to proa lower versifieVtheither ration anprincipal mapping? The risk measures are non-linear. e to imperfecorrelations between pairwise risk factors. Fewer totcash flows will mappe We cannot expea lower versifieVaR. B is correct. 考点 &#xFF1A; Mapping to FixeIncome Portfolios 解析 &#xFF1A; The versifieVis lower e to two factors. First, risk measures are not perfectly linewith maturity. Secon correlations are below unity, whireces risk even further. 如题

2024-03-05 03:24 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000044 问题如下 Unr these assumptions - in particular: a flat yielcurve anconstant yielvolatility of 1.0% - why cwe expecash flow mapping to proa lower versifieVtheither ration anprincipal mapping? The risk measures are non-linear. e to imperfecorrelations between pairwise risk factors. Fewer totcash flows will mappe We cannot expea lower versifieVaR. B is correct. 考点 &#xFF1A; Mapping to FixeIncome Portfolios 解析 &#xFF1A; The versifieVis lower e to two factors. First, risk measures are not perfectly linewith maturity. Secon correlations are below unity, whireces risk even further. versifieV是指什么?是不是只有Mapping 才有versifieVaR, 因为只有Mapping考虑multiple risk factors?

2022-09-07 11:52 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000044 e to imperfecorrelations between pairwise risk factors. Fewer totcash flows will mappe We cannot expea lower versifieVaR. B is correct. 考点 Mapping to FixeIncome Portfolios 解析 The versifieVis lower e to two factors. First, risk measures are not perfectly linewith maturity. Secon correlations are below unity, whireces risk even further. mapping 难道不是一定大于本金mapping的吗 为什么会小 题干对sigma的描述说明了什么

2022-03-15 09:01 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000044

2022-03-03 22:03 3 · 回答