开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

天天 · 2023年07月02日

拒绝域小,异常值就多,则数据更准。咋跟我理解不同?

NO.PZ2018122701000035

问题如下:

You are backtesting a bank’s VaR model. Currently, the bank calculates a 1-day VaR at the 99% confidence level, and you are recommending that is switch to a 95% confidence level. Which of the following statements concerning this switch is correct?

选项:

A.

The 95% VaR model is less likely to be rejected using backtesting than the 99% VaR model.

B.

When validating with backtesting at the 90% confidence level, there is a smaller probability of incorrectly rejecting a 95% VaR model when it is valid than a 99% VaR model.

C.

The decision to accept or reject a VaR model based on backtesting results is more reliable with a 95% confidence level VaR model than with a 99% confidence level model.

D.

When backtesting using a 90% confidence level, there is a smaller probability of committing a type I error when backtesting a 95% VaR model than with a 99% VaR model.

解释:

C is correct.

考点 Backtesting VaR

解析 The concept tested here is the understanding of the difference between the VaR parameter for confidence (here, namely 95% vs 99%) and the validation procedure confidence level, and how they interact with one another. Using a VaR confidence level creates a narrower rejection region by allowing a greater number of exceptions to be generated. This in turn increases the power of the backtesting process and makes for a more reliable test.

Using a VaR confidence level creates a narrower rejection region by allowing a greater number of exceptions to be generated. This in turn increases the power of the backtesting process and makes for a more reliable test.

VAR 99%的拒绝域是1%,属于更窄的拒绝域,应该产生更多的异常值。进而增加回测检验的有效力,增加验证的可信赖力?

但选择C,感觉是95%会更好呢?

1 个答案

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2023年07月02日

同学你好,更窄的拒绝域异常值会更少,99%的confidence level异常值的期望比例只有1%。

这个实际上是个实证研究的结果,原版书里也提及了原因,主要是高分位的VaR太容易被击穿了,所以结果回测起来不靠谱。可以看一下本节经典题1.4的讲解,是本题原题。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 332

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2018122701000035问题如下 You are backtesting a bank’s Vmol. Currently, the bank calculates a 1-y Vthe 99% confinlevel, anyou are recommenng this switto a 95% confinlevel. Whiof the following statements concerning this switis correct? The 95% Vmol is less likely to be rejecteusing backtesting ththe 99% Vmol. When valiting with backtesting the 90% confinlevel, there is a smaller probability of incorrectly rejecting a 95% Vmol when it is valitha 99% Vmol. The cision to accept or rejea Vmol baseon backtesting results is more reliable with a 95% confinlevel VaR mol thwith a 99% confinlevel mol. When backtesting using a 90% confince level, there is a smaller probability of committing a type I error when backtesting a 95% Vmol thwith a 99% Vmol. C is correct. 考点 : Backtesting VaR 解析 : The concept testehere is the unrstanng of the fferenbetween the Vparameter for confin(here, namely 95% vs 99%) anthe valition procere confinlevel, anhow they interawith one another. Using a Vconfinlevel creates a narrower rejection region allowing a greater number of exceptions to generate This in turn increases the power of the backtesting process anmakes for a more reliable test. 低置信度的VAR不是可以容纳异常数据更多吗,更不容易拒绝吧

2024-07-17 12:51 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000035 问题如下 You are backtesting a bank’s Vmol. Currently, the bank calculates a 1-y Vthe 99% confinlevel, anyou are recommenng this switto a 95% confinlevel. Whiof the following statements concerning this switis correct? The 95% Vmol is less likely to be rejecteusing backtesting ththe 99% Vmol. When valiting with backtesting the 90% confinlevel, there is a smaller probability of incorrectly rejecting a 95% Vmol when it is valitha 99% Vmol. The cision to accept or rejea Vmol baseon backtesting results is more reliable with a 95% confinlevel VaR mol thwith a 99% confinlevel mol. When backtesting using a 90% confince level, there is a smaller probability of committing a type I error when backtesting a 95% Vmol thwith a 99% Vmol. C is correct. 考点 : Backtesting VaR 解析 : The concept testehere is the unrstanng of the fferenbetween the Vparameter for confin(here, namely 95% vs 99%) anthe valition procere confinlevel, anhow they interawith one another. Using a Vconfinlevel creates a narrower rejection region allowing a greater number of exceptions to generate This in turn increases the power of the backtesting process anmakes for a more reliable test. 95%的vmol 不是显著性水平更大,type I error的概率就大,所以更不可靠吗。。这么理解是哪里错了呢

2024-04-22 06:38 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000035 问题如下 You are backtesting a bank’s Vmol. Currently, the bank calculates a 1-y Vthe 99% confinlevel, anyou are recommenng this switto a 95% confinlevel. Whiof the following statements concerning this switis correct? The 95% Vmol is less likely to be rejecteusing backtesting ththe 99% Vmol. When valiting with backtesting the 90% confinlevel, there is a smaller probability of incorrectly rejecting a 95% Vmol when it is valitha 99% Vmol. The cision to accept or rejea Vmol baseon backtesting results is more reliable with a 95% confinlevel VaR mol thwith a 99% confinlevel mol. When backtesting using a 90% confince level, there is a smaller probability of committing a type I error when backtesting a 95% Vmol thwith a 99% Vmol. C is correct. 考点 : Backtesting VaR 解析 : The concept testehere is the unrstanng of the fferenbetween the Vparameter for confin(here, namely 95% vs 99%) anthe valition procere confinlevel, anhow they interawith one another. Using a Vconfinlevel creates a narrower rejection region allowing a greater number of exceptions to generate This in turn increases the power of the backtesting process anmakes for a more reliable test. 为什么c是对的,还有那个95%VAR和99%VAR在假设检验的时候有什么用

2024-03-05 02:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000035问题如下 You are backtesting a bank’s Vmol. Currently, the bank calculates a 1-y Vthe 99% confinlevel, anyou are recommenng this switto a 95% confinlevel. Whiof the following statements concerning this switis correct? The 95% Vmol is less likely to be rejecteusing backtesting ththe 99% Vmol. When valiting with backtesting the 90% confinlevel, there is a smaller probability of incorrectly rejecting a 95% Vmol when it is valitha 99% Vmol. The cision to accept or rejea Vmol baseon backtesting results is more reliable with a 95% confinlevel VaR mol thwith a 99% confinlevel mol. When backtesting using a 90% confince level, there is a smaller probability of committing a type I error when backtesting a 95% Vmol thwith a 99% Vmol. C is correct. 考点 : Backtesting VaR 解析 : The concept testehere is the unrstanng of the fferenbetween the Vparameter for confin(here, namely 95% vs 99%) anthe valition procere confinlevel, anhow they interawith one another. Using a Vconfinlevel creates a narrower rejection region allowing a greater number of exceptions to generate This in turn increases the power of the backtesting process anmakes for a more reliable test. ​a本身也是对的吧

2024-02-02 07:45 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000035问题如下 You are backtesting a bank’s Vmol. Currently, the bank calculates a 1-y Vthe 99% confinlevel, anyou are recommenng this switto a 95% confinlevel. Whiof the following statements concerning this switis correct? The 95% Vmol is less likely to be rejecteusing backtesting ththe 99% Vmol. When valiting with backtesting the 90% confinlevel, there is a smaller probability of incorrectly rejecting a 95% Vmol when it is valitha 99% Vmol. The cision to accept or rejea Vmol baseon backtesting results is more reliable with a 95% confinlevel VaR mol thwith a 99% confinlevel mol. When backtesting using a 90% confince level, there is a smaller probability of committing a type I error when backtesting a 95% Vmol thwith a 99% Vmol. C is correct. 考点 : Backtesting VaR 解析 : The concept testehere is the unrstanng of the fferenbetween the Vparameter for confin(here, namely 95% vs 99%) anthe valition procere confinlevel, anhow they interawith one another. Using a Vconfinlevel creates a narrower rejection region allowing a greater number of exceptions to generate This in turn increases the power of the backtesting process anmakes for a more reliable test. 可以下c95%的置信水平下backtesting比99%更可以信赖

2024-01-12 16:19 1 · 回答