开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

S. Wang · 2023年06月22日

被动投资和主动投资的engagement method有什么本质区别吗?我理解主动需要更加活跃的engagement,除此之外还有区别吗?

NO.PZ2022120703000051

问题如下:

A top-down engagement style most likely:

选项:

A.aligns more closely with active rather than passive portfolios. B.involves discussions with the boards of individual companies. C.focuses on environmental and social issues rather than governance issues.

解释:

C is correct because "teams tend to focus on individual environmental and social issues and to pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets as a whole...while firms with governance heritage tend to focus on individual companies...these are generalisations but they illustrate the distinction between top-down and bottom-up activity." Hence, firms with environmental-led heritage typically engage in top-down activity while governance-led firms focus on bottom-up activity.

A is incorrect because "company-focused, bottom-up engagement fits most naturally with active investment approaches...whereas issue-based, top-down engagement tends to align more closely with passive or otherwise broadly diversified investment portfolios."

B is incorrect because "teams tend to focus on individual environmental and social issues and to pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets as a whole...while firms with governance heritage tend to focus on individual companies, starting with the chair...and working through the board...these are generalisations but they illustrate the distinction between top-down and bottom-up activity." Hence, it is the bottom-up activity (associated with firms with governance heritage) which involves contacting individual companies.

被动投资和主动投资的engagement method有什么本质区别吗?我理解主动需要更加活跃的engagement,除此之外还有区别吗?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

净净_品职助教 · 2023年06月23日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


这就需要搞清楚被动投资和主动投资的区别。被动投资一般是跟踪大盘指数,投资范围非常广,是没有办法做到像主动投资那样,针对每一家公司进行参与活动,只能说针对某一个行业性问题,通过一些方式去影响行业内所有公司,比较像一对多的形式。主动投资本身就是针对每一家公司进行分析研究,确定投资标的,在参与时经常时一对一的。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 636

    浏览
相关问题

答案判断及提示不正确 自上而下更关注的是治理问题。

2024-08-05 09:32 1 · 回答

解析错误 c的与答案正好相反

2024-07-17 19:06 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000051 问题如下 A top-wn engagement style most likely: A.aligns more closely with active rather thpassive portfolios. B.involves scussions with the boar of invicompanies. C.focuses on environmentansociissues rather thgovernanissues. C is correbecause \"teams tento focus on invienvironmentansociissues anto pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets a whole...while firms with governanheritage tento focus on invicompanies...these are generalisations but they illustrate the stinction between top-wn anbottom-up activity.\" Hence, firms with environmental-leheritage typically engage in top-wn activity while governance-lefirms focus on bottom-up activity.A is incorrebecause \"company-focuse bottom-up engagement fits most naturally with active investment approaches...whereissue-base top-wn engagement ten to align more closely with passive or otherwise broay versifieinvestment portfolios.\"B is incorrebecause \"teams tento focus on invienvironmentansociissues anto pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets a whole...while firms with governanheritage tento focus on invicompanies, starting with the chair...anworking through the boar..these are generalisations but they illustrate the stinction between top-wn anbottom-up activity.\" Hence, it is the bottom-up activity (associatewith firms with governanheritage) whiinvolves contacting invicompanies. 为什么E和S要至上而下,G要至下而上啊? 不理解 基础课程什么地方有具体讲解吗?

2023-12-22 13:13 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000051问题如下 A top-wn engagement style most likely: A.aligns more closely with active rather thpassive portfolios.B.involves scussions with the boar of invicompanies.C.focuses on environmentansociissues rather thgovernanissues. C is correbecause \"teams tento focus on invienvironmentansociissues anto pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets a whole...while firms with governanheritage tento focus on invicompanies...these are generalisations but they illustrate the stinction between top-wn anbottom-up activity.\" Hence, firms with environmental-leheritage typically engage in top-wn activity while governance-lefirms focus on bottom-up activity.A is incorrebecause \"company-focuse bottom-up engagement fits most naturally with active investment approaches...whereissue-base top-wn engagement ten to align more closely with passive or otherwise broay versifieinvestment portfolios.\"B is incorrebecause \"teams tento focus on invienvironmentansociissues anto pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets a whole...while firms with governanheritage tento focus on invicompanies, starting with the chair...anworking through the boar..these are generalisations but they illustrate the stinction between top-wn anbottom-up activity.\" Hence, it is the bottom-up activity (associatewith firms with governanheritage) whiinvolves contacting invicompanies. 老师请问A是什么,

2023-06-15 15:33 3 · 回答